Muhammad Rustamaji, Dewi Gunawati


The study aims to obtain a method forlearningpseudo trialpress law forlaw enforcers. The design ofthis study is action research (participatory research actions) that combines legal research and studies in the education sector. Normativeresearch methods and sociologicalstudies used appropriate phasing In each year. The types ofdata used inthis study includeprimaryand secondary data. Data collection methods are interviews, questionnaires, and literature. Data processing is carried out through the stages of editing, coding, tabulating. Analysis technique using inductive and deductive thinking .. Observation of actual handling of the case became the foundation for further analysis based on legislation and groove trial. Observations thus further utilizedto formulate the appropriate method of fictitious courtpress law. In the first year of thisstudy produced findings: a) identification of two dominant factors typically by law enforce mentofficials inthe press dispute, namely the use of Criminal Code offenses and negationcase particularities press, b). finding of distinctiveness criteria law enforcementpress located on the rightofreply and the
role of the Press Council in the settlement release applied to the fictitious trial methods, c) learned of discrepanciesinthe prototype method fictitious courtpress law enforcementagainstactualpracticein the field ofpress due to the design oflearning in one direction and instructionalissues that are not collaborative. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate that a) the dominant factor affecting the typical law enforcement officials in the press dispute actually consists of the application of the dominantoffense in the Criminal Codeas anaffront legalsnares for members ofthepress, and did not understand theuniqueness ofdisputesettlementinthe groove press releases as Act mandatedby the press, b) uniquenesslies in the settlement conference where the submission of the right of reply, complaintsto the Press Council, until the publication of the Press Council rekomendasai that preceded the litigatifc) discrepancies prototype art if icialmethods of learning trials with the reality of law enforcement is due to the instructional design of the course and instructional problems that actuallycan be parsed by the collaborative.

Full Text:



  • There are currently no refbacks.