Efektivitas Implementasi Model Problem Based Learning (PBL), Blended Learning (BL), Serta Integrasinya Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Mengevaluasi Dan Kreativitas Siswa

EDI PRANOTO, SUCIATI SUDARISMAN, WIDHA SUNARNO

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL), Blended Learning (BL) models, and the Integration of BL-PBL, capability of evaluating and creativity toward student’s achievement. This experimental research was carried out in September to December 2013. The populations of research were all students in grade XI of SMA Negeri l Pati Academic Year 2013/2014 that consists of 262 students divided into eight study groups. The sample of research was consisted of three study groups; they were XI-IPA2, XI-IPA4 and XI-IPA6 determined by random cluster sampling technique. XI-IPA2 study group used BL model, XI-IPA4 study group used PBL model, and XI-IPA6 study group used the Integration of BL-PBL models. The data was collected by using the instrument of cognitive test, and questionnaires of affective, psychomotor, capability of evaluating and creativity. The data then was analyzed by using three-ways ANAVA with 3x2x2 factorial design with signification 5%, and it then was continued by using Scheffe test if there was interaction. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that: 1) There was no difference of effect of BL, PBL, and the Integration of BL-PBL models toward student’s cognitive, affective and psychomotor achievements; 2) There was difference of effect of capability of evaluating toward student’s cognitive, affective and psychomotor achievements; 3) There was effect of creativity toward student’s cognitive, affective and psychomotor achievements; 4) There was no interaction between BL, PBL, and the Integration of BL-PBL models with the capability of evaluating toward student’s cognitive, affective and psychomotor achievements; 5) There was interaction between BL, PBL models, and the Integration of BL-PBL with the creativity toward student’s cognitive, affective and psychomotor achievements; 6) There was interaction between capability of evaluating and creativity toward student’s cognitive, affective and psychomotor achievements; 7) There was no interaction between BL, PBL models, and the Integration of BL-PBL, capability of evaluating and creativity toward student’s cognitive, affective and psychomotor achievements.

 

Keywords

blended learning; problem based learning models; capability of evaluating; and creativity

Full Text:

PDF

References

Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The Delphi Report. The California Academic Press.

Gallagher, S.A., & Gallagher, J.J. (2013). Using Problem-based Learning to Explore Unseen Academic Potential [Electronic Version]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. Vol. 7(1)

Juliantine, T. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Siswa Melalui Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Prosiding jurnal [Electronic Version]. The International Conference of Physical Education and Sport. UPI. Vol. 1: 1-13

Melton, B., Graf, H., & Foss, J. (2009). Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended Learning versus Traditional General Health Course Designs [Electronic Version]. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Vol. 3 (1): 1-13. ISSN 1931-4744

Munandar, U. (2004). Pengembangan Kreati-vitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Padmono, Y. (2011). Hasil Belajar dan Mengukurnya [Electronic Version], Editorial Jurnal Edukasi-Berpikir Kritis.

Pardjono & Wardaya. (2009). Peningkatkan Kemampuan Analisis, Sintesis, Dan Evaluasi Melalui Pembelajaran Problem Solving. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. 3: 257-269.

Pratama, P. (2012). Hubungan Antara Kecen-derungan Berpikir Kritis Dengan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif (IPK) Mahasiswa Prodi Dokter FK UNDIP [Electronic Version]. (Laporan Hasil Penelitian Karya Tulis Ilmiah Tidak Dipublikasikan. FK UNDIP 2012)

Sahin, M. (2011). Opinions Of Trainers On Blended Learning Model In Higher Vocational Education And Training. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications. 2 (3) Article: 4 ISSN 1309-62496249

Slavin, R.E. (1997). Educational Psychology Theory and Practice. Fourth Edition. Boston: Allyn-Bacon Press

Suciati. (2013). Implementasi Pendekatan Kontekstual Dengan Variasi Metode Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Biologi. JPII 2 (1): 23-30

Sulaiman, F. (2013). Physics students’ acceptance of PBL online in terms Of learning outcomes. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. 2(3): 50-55

Suparno, P. (1997). Filsafat Konstruktivisme Dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Suparno, P. (1997). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Uzun, A. & Senturk, A. (2010). Blending Makes the Difference: Comparison of Blended and Traditional Instruction on Students’ Performance and Attitudes in Computer Literacy. Contemporary Educational Technology. Vol. 1(3): 196.

Vesisenaho, M. (2010). Blended learning with everyday technologies to activate students’collaborative learning. University of Eastern Finland. Finland: Science Education International.

Yapici, I.U. & Akbayin, H. (2012). The Effect Of Blended Learning Model On High School Students’ Biology Achievement And On Their Attitudes Towards The Internet. Turkey. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 11(2): 228-237.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.