Effectiveness of Virtual STEM Laboratories for Enhancing High School Students' Creativity and STEM Literacy
Abstract
The Virtual STEM Laboratory is a contextual experimental simulation learning tool that integrates science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) concepts. This study aims to investigate the Virtual STEM Laboratory's effectiveness in enhancing high school students' STEM literacy and creativity. STEM literacy is defined as the ability of a student to apply, identify, and integrate STEM concepts to solve complex problems and innovate in various areas. Meanwhile, creativity refers to the capability to generate novel and valuable ideas or solutions. The study used an experimental design with a control group to compare the effectiveness of the Virtual STEM Laboratory. In addition, students' STEM literacy and creativity were measured using posttest scores. The results showed that the experimental group had higher STEM literacy and creativity scores compared to the control group, which indicates the effectiveness of the Virtual STEM Laboratory. The study found that the Virtual STEM Laboratory improved STEM literacy as measured by the independent t-test and Kruskal Wallis test with a significance value of 0.000. This suggests that the experimental group had better STEM literacy skills than the control group. The Virtual STEM Laboratory was also found to be effective in enhancing student creativity as measured by the independent t-test with a significance value of 0.000, which implies that the experimental group generated more novel and valuable ideas than the control group. The study confirms the Virtual STEM Laboratory's effectiveness in enhancing high school students' STEM literacy and creativity. The Virtual STEM Laboratory is a valuable tool that can improve students' STEM literacy and creativity, thus contributing to their academic and professional development. Further studies can be conducted to explore the potential of the Virtual STEM Laboratory in enhancing other aspects of STEM education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] D. F. Treagust and G. Chittleborough, “Chemistry: A matter of understanding representations,” Subj. instr. methods Act., vol. 13, pp. 239–267, 2015,
doi: 10.1016/S1479-3687(01)80029-8
[2] U. P. Mafor and Ramnarain, “A comparative analysis of virtual and traditional laboratory chemistry learning,” Pakistan J. Educ., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 80–97, 2009,
doi: 10.30971/pje.v27i1.144.
[3] D. Nuha, H. Haryono, and B. Mulyani, "Kontribusi Laboratorium Terhadap Pembelajaran Kimia SMA," Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, " vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 2015.
[4] S. E. Austin, R. Biesbroek, L. Berrang-Ford, J. D. Ford, S. Parker, and M. D. Fleury, "Public health adaptation to climate change in OECD countries," Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol.13, no. 9, pp. 889, 2016,
[5] M. Olufsen, M. Stojanovska, and V. Petrusevski, “Practical Work in Chemistry, its goals and effects," A Guidebook of Good Practice for the Pre-service Training of Chemistry Teachers, pp. 87–106, 2015.
[6] A. Hofstein, “The Laboratory in Chemistry Education: Thirty Years of Experience With Developments, Implementation, and Research,” Chem. Educ. res. Pr., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 247–264, 2004,
doi: 10.1039/b4rp90027h.
[7] S. Rahmiyati, "Effectiveness of Laboratory Utilization in Madrasah Aliyah Yogyakarta," J. Researcher. and Eval. Educator., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 88–100, 2013,
[8] N. F. Rahmadani, S. R. D. Ariani, S. Mulyani, and N. Y. Indriyanti, “Chemistry Teachers' Perspectives on Virtual STEM Laboratories as Learning Media," Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020) , vol. 541, pp. 627–633, 2021
doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210326.091.
[9] M. Nuswowati, W. Sumarni, and M. Taufiq, “Analysis of quantity and quality of the implementation of high school chemical practicum in Semarang city," J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1567, no. 4, 2020,
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042011.
[10] D. Rahman, Adlim, and Mustanir, "Analisis Kendala dan Alternatif Solusi Terhadap Pelaksanaan Praktikum Kimia pada SLTA Negeri Kabupaten Aceh Besar," JPSI, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2015.
[11] D. Basavaiah and G. Veeraraghavaiah, "The Baylis–Hillman reaction: a novel concept for creativity in chemistry," Chem. Soc. Rev., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 68-78, 2020,
doi: 10.1039/C1CS15174F.
[12] F. S. Arista and H. Kuswanto, “Virtual physics laboratory application based on the android smartphone to improve learning independence and conceptual understanding,” Int. J. Instr. , vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2018,
[13] Z. Tatli and A. Ayas, “Effect of a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory on Students' Achievement,” JSTOR, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 159–170, 2013.
[14] M. Muhamad, H. B. Zaman, and A. Ahmad, “Virtual Laboratory for Learning Biology – A Preliminary Investigation,” World Acad. science. eng. Technol. , vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 572–575, 2010.
[15] I. Hawkins and A. J. Phelps, “Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: Which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry?,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 516–523, 2013,
doi: 10.1039/c3rp00070b.
[16] A. Hidayat and V. G. Utomo, “Virtual Laboratory Implementation To Support High School Learning,” Int. J. Comput. App., vol. 120, no. 16, pp. 14–18, 2015,
doi: 10.5120/21310-4283.
[17] K. Winkelmann, M. Scott, and D. Wong, “A Study of High School Students' Performance of a Chemistry Experiment within the Virtual World of Second Life,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 91, pp. 1432–1438, 2014,
doi: 10.1021/ed500009e.
[18] N. Hikmah, N. Saridewi, and S. Agung, “Penerapan Laboratorium Virtual untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa,” EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan) , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 186–195, 2017,
doi: 10.30870/educhemia.v2i2.1608.
[19] Nurazizah, IR Suwarma, A. Jauhari, and I. Kaniawati, "Implementation of STEM learning: a study of student achievement," Pros. Semin. Nas. Fis. 2018 , pp. 126–130, 2018.
[20] G. Falloon, M. Hatzigianni, M. Bower, A. Forbes, and M. Stevenson, “Understanding K-12 STEM Education: a Framework for Developing STEM Literacy,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 369–385, 2020,
doi: 10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x.
[21] C. McDonald, “STEM Education: A Review of the Contribution of the Disciplines of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 530–569, 2016.
[22] S. Hanif, A. F. C. Wijaya, and N. Winarno, “Enhancing Students' Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning,” Journal of Science Learning, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 50, 2019,
[23] S. W. Utomo, M. Ubaidillah, S. Joyoatmojo, S. Yutmini, and N. Suryani, “Improving Students' Creativity in Video Making by Problem Based Learning Model,” International Journal of Educational Research Review, pp. 481–488, 2019,
[24] S. E. August, “Engaging Students in STEM Education through a Virtual Learning Lab,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, pp. 1-11, 2011,
doi: 10.18260/1-2--17854.
[25] F. Fahmi and Y. Irhasyuarna, “Misconceptions of Reaction Rates on High School Level in Banjarmasin,” IOSRJRME, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2017,
[26] S. Chen, W. H. Chang, C. H. Lai, and C. Y. Tsai, “A Comparison of Students' Approaches to Inquiry, Conceptual Learning, and Attitudes in Simulation-Based and Microcomputer-Based Laboratories,” Sci. Educ., vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 905–935, 2014,
doi: 10.1002/sce.21126.
[27] J. C. Domínguez, R. Miranda, E. J. González, M. Oliet, and M. V. Alonso, “A virtual lab as a complement to traditional hands-on labs: Characterization of an alkaline electrolyzer for hydrogen production,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 23, pp. 7–17, 2018,
doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2018.03.002.
[28] I. Ismail, A. Permanasari, and W. Setiawan, “Stem virtual lab: An alternative practical media to enhance student's scientific literacy,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 239–246, 2016,
[29] D. Inshasiska, S. Zubaidah, and H. Susilo, "Pengaruh Project Based Learning terhadap Motivasi Belajar, Kreativitas, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, dan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Pembelajaran Biologi," Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2015,
[30] A. Craft, "An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education". Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 1-37, 2001.
[31] D. Ebbing and S. D. Gammon, General Chemistry. Singapore: Cengage Learning, 2016,
ISBN: 9781305672864.
[32] S. Akaygun and F. Aslan-Tutak, "STEM images revealing stem conceptions of pre-service chemistry and mathematics teachers," International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56-71, 2016,
[33] H. D. Barke, G. Harsch, and S. Schmid, Essentials of chemical education. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012,
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21756-2.
[34] H. D. Barke, A. Hazari, and S. Yitbarek, Misconceptions in chemistry. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009,
doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70989-3.
[35] K. Osman and A. N. Lay, "MyKimDG module: An interactive platform towards development of twenty-first century skills and improvement of students’ knowledge in chemistry," Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1461-1474, 2020,
doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1729208
[36] K. Hubbard, "Disciplinary literacies in STEM: what do undergraduates read, how do they read it, and can we teach scientific reading more effectively?". Higher Education Pedagogies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41-65, 2021,
doi:10.1080/23752696.2021.1882326
[37] S. Arikan, E. Erktin, and M. Pesen," Development and validation of a STEM competencies assessment framework," Int. J. of Sci. and Math. Educ., vol. 4, pp. 1-24, 2022,
doi: 10.1007/s10763-020-10132-3.
[38] L. Ah-Nam and K. Osman, "Developing 21st century skills through a constructivist-constructionist learning environment," K-12 Stem Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 205-216, 2021.
[39] M. A. Ditzler and R. W. Ricci, "Discovery chemistry: Balancing creativity and structure," J. Chem. Educ., vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 685, 1994,
doi: 10.1021/ed071p685.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.