汉语动词“吞”的宾语搭配分析

Winnie Cherina, Kornelius Setya Kwa

Abstract

Existing studies of Chinese ingestion verbs have focused mainly on high-frequency verbs such as chi (“eat”) and he (“drink”), leaving the verb tun (“swallow”) and its object collocations understudied. This study addresses this gap using the literary sub-corpus of BCC. From 278 retrieved entries, 255 valid entries were retained and analyzed qualitatively with manual annotation and auxiliary frequency counts. The study identifies three senses of tun: “swallow without chewing,” “engulf,” and “embezzle/appropriate.” Nominal objects are distributed across these senses at 75.47%, 18.87% and 5.66%, respectively. Sense (1) collocates mainly with food items and biological parts; sense (2) with natural objects; sense (3) is dispersed and mainly economic. As the sense extends from physiological action to resultative and social-behavioral meanings, object range contracts and semantic selectivity weakens. The study contributes to research on ingestion verbs by showing how object semantic classes constrain sense selection, with implications for dictionary compilation and Chinese vocabulary teaching. The literary sub-corpus may inflate metaphorical usage, a limitation to be addressed in future multi-register research.

Keywords

Swallow; Semantic Group; Semantic Features; Verb-Object Collocation; Verb tūn (Swallow)

References

[1] Drude, S., Broeder, D., & Trilsbeek, P. (2014). The Language Archive and its solutions for sustainable endangered languages corpora. Book 2.0, 4(1–2), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1386/btwo.4.1-2.5_1

[2] Resnik, P. Selection and Information: A Class-Based Approach to Lexical Relationships(D).Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1993.

[3] UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages. (2003). Language vitality and endangerment. UNESCO.

[4] 段玉裁(2013).说文解字注.北京:中华书局.

[5] 黄洁(2015).“吃 + NP − p”语义网络建构及主观性阐释.外语与外语教学, (2), 26–31.

[6] 李姣姣(2019).动词“办”“干”“做”的宾语搭配研究(硕士学位论文).上海大学.

[7] 李娟(2022). 汉语近义词辨析知识库构建研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),58(1):106–112. https://doi.org/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2021.098

[8] 李勇忠, 郭佳(2025).非常规动宾结构形成路径探究:认知—社会融合视角.外国语言文学, (5), 52–63.

[9] 梁浩蕾(2013).基于语料库的名词“东西”指称功能的深度分析(硕士学位论文).华中师范大学.

[10] 楼捷,俞晓强(2024). 二语词汇广度、词频与接受性搭配知识的相关研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报,46(5):131–143. https://doi.org/10.12002/j.bisu.547

[11] 齐静(2010).摄入类动词的认知隐喻分析.说文解字, (1).

[12] 苏新春.现代汉语分类词典[Z].商务印书馆.2017.04.

[13] 陶红印(2000).从“吃”看动词论元结构的动态特征.语言研究, (3).

[14] 邢福义(1991).汉语里宾语代人现象之观察.世界汉语教学, (2), 76–84.

[15] 阳捷,孙建荣(2020). 基于语料库的学习型汉语词典例证搭配研究[J]. 澳门科技大学学报(人文社会科学版),14(2):28–39. https://doi.org/10.58664/mustjournal.2020.02.028

[16] 杨火枚,赵海霞(2024). 汉语学习型词典中动词「进行」的搭配和类联接信息展示[J]. 澳门科技大学学报(人文社会科学版),18(2):119–140. https://doi.org/10.58664/mustjournal.2024.06.006

[17] 叶瑞娟、叶美利、郑萦、黄汉君(2025). 中文近义动词“擦、涂、抹”之词汇语意和构式搭配分析. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 23(1), 41–89. https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.202501_23(1).0002

[18] 张绒(2025).“个”插入动宾式离合词的句法研究.语言文字学术研究, (21), 51–54.

[19] 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室(2016). 现代汉语词典(第7版). 北京:商务印书馆.

[20] 商务印书馆辞书研究中心(编)(2013). 新华词典(第4版). 北京:商务印书馆.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.