The Chemistry Triangle-Based Multimedia to Build A Good Impression: A Design-Based Research
Abstract
Science teachers need to pay attention when introducing chemistry to junior high school students hence they don't have low perceptions of chemistry. Multimedia which based on the chemistry triangle can be a solution in helping teachers explains the relationships among macroscopic, sub-microscopic, and symbolic level of chemistry so students can understand the scientific contents better and have a good perceptions. This research aimed to develop a chemistry triangle-based multimedia to build a good impression on junior high school students about chemistry. The design of chemistry triangle-based multimedia was developed through a design-based research (DBR). The participants in the research were three schools of seventh-grade students in Pekalongan Regency, Indonesia. The data were collected through interviews, observations, questionnaires, and tests. The results of this research were in the form of the complete cycles of DBR carried out to produce a chemistry triangle-based multimedia that meets the criteria in helping teachers introduce chemistry in a way that is more easily accepted by students and gives a positive impression about chemistry. This article describes the four phases of the DBR process in the development of chemistry triangle-based multimedia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, T. (2012). A case study of the common difficulties experienced by high school students in chemistry classroom in gilgit-baltistan (Pakistan). SAGE Open, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012447299
Alkharusi, H. (2008). Effects of classroom assessment practices on students’ achievement goals. Educational Assessment, 13(4), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190802602509
Alkharusi, H. (2015). An evaluation of the measurement of perceived classroom assessment environment. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.824a
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Barke, H.-D., Harsch, G., & Schmid, S. (2012). Essentials of Chemical Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21756-2
Cheung, D. (2009). Students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons: The interaction effect between grade level and gender. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9075-4
Crooks, T. J. (1988). The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students. Riview of Edcuational Research, 58(4), 438–481.
Dzulkifli, M. A., & Mustafar, M. F. (2013). the Influence on Memory Performance. Malayasian Journal of Medical Science, 20(2), 3–9.
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Models and Modeling in Science Education: Multiple Representations in Chemical Education (Volume 4). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8 Library
Gusmida, R., & Islami, N. (2017). The Development of Learning Media for the Kinetic Theory of Gases Using the ADDIE Model with Augmented Reality. Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.1.1.p.1-10
Haber, J., & Tesoriero, R. (2018). Student Impression Management in the Classroom. Global Research in Higher Education, 1(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v1n1p69
Herrington, J., McKenney, S., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education-a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
Hung, H. T. (2011). Design-based research: Designing a multimedia environment to support language learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2011.564011
Jalil, N. A., Yunus, R. M., & Said, N. S. (2012). Environmental Colour Impact upon Human Behaviour: A Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35(December 2011), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.062
Johnson, C., Hill, L., Lock, J., Altowairiki, N., Ostrowski, C., dos Santos, L. da R., & Liu, Y. (2017). Using Design-Based Research to Develop Meaningful Online Discussions in Undergraduate Field Experience Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(6), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2901
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
Judd, T., & Keith, B. (2015). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program and Institutional Levels. In Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education (pp. 31–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203142189.ch3
Kaya, E., & Yildirim, A. (2014). Science Anxiety among Failing Students. Elementary Education Online, 13(2), 518–525. http://ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=97484878&site=ehost-live
Kotryakhov, N. V., Masalimova, A. R., Sizova, Z. M., & Kurbanov, R. A. (2019). Development of university students’ motivation with the help of e-learning. Elementary Education Online, 18(3), 1030–1042. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.609701
Kristanto, A., Mustaji, M., & Mariono, A. (2017). The Development of Instructional Materials E-Learning Based On Blended Learning. International Education Studies, 10(7), 10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n7p10
Kurt, S., & Osueke, K. K. (2014). The Effects of Color on the Moods of College Students. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014525423
Ljubojevic, M., Vaskovic, V., Stankovic, S., & Vaskovic, J. (2014). Using supplementary video in multimedia instruction as a teaching tool to increase efficiency of learning and quality of experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 275–291.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. In Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (p. 5).
Papo, W. (2001). Integration Of Educational Media in Higher Education Large Classes. Educational Media International, 38(2–3), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980110041908
Pope, D. J., Butler, H., & Qualter, P. (2012). Emotional Understanding and Color-Emotion Associations in Children Aged 7-8 Years. Child Development Research, 2012, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/975670
Quick, D. L., & Nelson, J. C. (1997). Organisational Behavior: Foundations, Realities, and Challenges. West Publishing Company.
Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design reserach from a technology perspective. In Educational Design Research (pp. 51–66). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00855_1.x
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A History of Instructional Design onci Technology: Port I: A History of Instructional Media. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64.
Rodriguez, M. C. (2004). The Role of Classroom Assessment in Student Performance on TIMSS. Applied Measurement in Education, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1701_1
Samudra, P. G., Min, I., Cortina, K. S., & Miller, K. F. (2016). No Second Chance to Make a First Impression: The “Thin-Slice” Effect on Instructor Ratings and Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12116
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–20.
Taber, K. (2002). Chemical Misconcepstion: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Cure (Volume 1). Royal Society of Chemistry.
Treagust, D. F., & Chittleborough, G. (2007). The Modelling Ability of Non-major Chemistry Students and Their Understanding of the Sub-microscopic Level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 274–361.
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306
Wegner, C., Homann, W., & Strehlke, F. (2014). Electronic learning in the German science project ‘ Nawi-Interaktiv .’ European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(4), 220–222. www.Nawi-Interaktiv.com
Woldeamanuel, M. M., Atagana, H., & Engida, T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult? African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(2), 31–43.
Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126
Yakmaci-Guzel, B., & Adadan, E. (2013). Use of multiple representations in developing preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding of the structure of matter. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 109–130.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
