Analysis of Student Understanding Related to Environmental Literature in Elementary School with Science Technology Community Approach

Muhammad Nur Hudha, Endah Vennita Rahayu Putri, Farida Nur Kumala

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine students' understanding of environmental literacy and the application of the Community Science Technology (STM) approach in elementary schools. The focus of the research is the application of the STM approach to improving the environmental literacy of third-grade students in an elementary school in Malang. The aspects used are based on environmental literacy indicators, including aspects of cognitive abilities and affective abilities. The research method used is a case study with a qualitative approach. The instruments used are observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis used refers to the Miles & Huberman model, which has three steps in analyzing the data: Data Reduction, Data Presentation, and Conclusion Drawing/Verification. The results showed that applying the STM approach could improve student learning outcomes. Student learning outcomes on aspects of cognitive abilities and affective abilities can be said to be good. The results of this completeness can conclude that the STM approach can improve student learning outcomes, especially in the aspect of environmental literacy.

Keywords

Environmental Literacy;Student Understanding; Community Science Technology Approach

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arrobas, Fernando, Jéssica Ferreira, Eduardo Brito-Henriques, and António Fernandes. (2020). “Measuring Tourism and Environmental Sciences Students’ Attitudes towards Sustainable Tourism.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education 27 (September): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100273.

Beyaz, Çağla, and Buket Asilsoy. (2019). “Knowledge of Green Buildings and Environmental Worldview among Interior Design Students.” International Journal of Advanced And Applied Sciences 6 (1): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.01.004.

Bolden, Isaiah W., Sasha K. Seroy, Emily A. Roberts, Lauren Schmeisser, J. Zachary Koehn, Canita H. Rilometo, Emerson Lopez Odango, Corrin Barros, Julian P. Sachs, and Terrie Klinger. (2018). “Climate-Related Community Knowledge Networks as a Tool to Increase Learning in the Context of Environmental Change.” Climate Risk Management 21 (May): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.04.004.

Desrinelti, Desrinelti, Firman Firman, and Desyandri Desyandri. (2021). “Efektivitas Pendekatan Science Technology Community ( STM ) Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Siswa Sekolah Dasar” 6 (1): 29–33.

Hariyani S, Sudarto, & Abdul mun’im. (2019). “Jurnal IPA Terpadu.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53 (9): 1689–99.

Jauhar, Sitti. (2018). “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Ips Berbasis Pendekatan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (Stm) Untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar.” JIKAP PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan 2 (2): 58. https://doi.org/10.26858/jkp.v2i2.6946.

Kidman, Gillian, and Niranjan Casinader. (2019). “Developing Teachers’ Environmental Literacy through Inquiry-Based Practices.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 15 (6). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103065.

Komariah, Neneng, Pawit M. Yusup, Encang Saepudin, and Saleha Rodiah. (2017). “Pendidikan Literasi Lingkungan Sebagai Penunjang Desa Wisata Agro Kecamatan Padaherang Kabupaten Pangandaran.” Jurnal Aplikasi Ipteks Untuk Masyarakat 6 (2): 111–15. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/dharmakarya/article/download/14781/7897.

Krishnan, Sruthi V, and Mohammed C Firoz. (2020). “Regional Urban Environmental Quality Assessment and Spatial Analysis.” Journal of Urban Management 9 (2): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2020.03.001.

Martins, Florinda, Carlos Felgueiras, Miroslava Smitkova, and Nídia Caetano. (2019). “Analysis of Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption and Environmental Impacts in European Countries.” Energies 12 (6): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12060964.

Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. (1984). “Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft.” Educational Researcher 13 (5): 20–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020.

Nurwidodo, N., Mohamad Amin, I. Ibrohim, and S. Sueb. (2020). “The Role of Eco-School Program (Adiwiyata) towards Environmental Literacy of High School Students.” European Journal of Educational Research 9 (3): 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.1089.

Oliver, Mary C., and Michael J. Adkins. (2020). “‘Hot-Headed’ Students? Scientific Literacy, Perceptions and Awareness of Climate Change in 15-Year Olds across 54 Countries.” Energy Research and Social Science 70 (June): 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101641.

Panwar, Manoj, Deepak Kumar Singh, and Veruval Devadas. (2018). “Analysis of Environmental Co-Benefits of Transportation Sub-System of Delhi.” Alexandria Engineering Journal 57 (4): 2649–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.10.001.

Pratiwi, Riska Dian, Rusdi Rusdi, and Ratna Komala. (2019). “The Effects of Personality and Intention to Act toward Responsible Environmental Behavior.” Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia 5 (1): 169–76. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7120.

Putri, Dwi Rahmi, Leny Yuanita, and Bambang Sugiarto. (2020). “Enhacing Mastery Of Students’ Concept Through Science Technology Society (STS) Approach On Chemical Equilibrium” 1 (Snk): 120–24. https://doi.org/10.2991/snk-19.2019.29.

Saidi, Siti Shahirah, and Nyet Moi Siew. (2018). “Assessing Students’ Understanding of the Measures of Central Tendency and Attitude towards Statistics in Rural Secondary Schools.” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 14 (1): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3968.

Schulz, Christopher, Bronwen S Whitney, Onélia Carmem, Danilo M Neves, Lauren Crabb, Emiliano Castro, De Oliveira, et al. (2019). “Science of the Total Environment Physical , Ecological and Human Dimensions of Environmental Change in Brazil ’ s Pantanal Wetland : Synthesis and Research Agenda.” Science of the Total Environment 687: 1011–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.023.

Smyth, Robyn L., Uroosa Fatima, Monique Segarra, Lisa Borre, Mariana I. Zilio, Brian Reid, Stephanie Pincetl, et al. (2020). “Engaging Stakeholders across a Socio-Environmentally Diverse Network of Water Research Sites in North and South America.” Environmental Development, no. November 2019: 100582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100582.

Sofiah, Rodatus, Suhartono Suhartono, and Ratna Hidayah. (2020). “Analisis Karakteristik Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (Stm) Sebagai Model Pembelajaran: Sebuah Studi Literatur.” Pedagogi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan 7 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25134/pedagogi.v7i1.2611.

Su, Mengmeng, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Jingjing Zhao, Shuang Song, Wei Zhou, Gaolang Gong, Catherine McBride, Twila Tardif, Franck Ramus, and Hua Shu. (2020). “Influences of the Early Family Environment and Long-Term Vocabulary Development on the Structure of White Matter Pathways: A Longitudinal Investigation.” Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 42: 100767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100767.

Turrini, Tabea, Daniel Dörler, Anett Richter, Florian Heigl, and Aletta Bonn. (2018). “The Threefold Potential of Environmental Citizen Science - Generating Knowledge, Creating Learning Opportunities and Enabling Civic Participation.” Biological Conservation 225 (March): 176–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024.

Zainuddin, Z., E. Irawati, A. M. Salam, M. Misbah, and D. Dewantara. (2020). “Developing of Natural Science Teaching Materials Character-Based in Science Technology and Society (STS) Approach.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1422 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012013.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v24i2.54232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.