Ethical Leadership in the Digital Era: Human Mediation of Digital Performance Metrics in Educational Personnel Evaluation
Abstract
The increasing use of digital metric-based performance evaluation systems in educational management has raised concerns about the ethical and human dimensions of personnel assessment. This study examines the role of ethical leadership in mediating the use of digital performance metrics in the evaluation of educational personnel. Employing a qualitative case study design, the study involved four participants, including school leadership and educators, in a pesantren-based Satuan Pendidikan Muadalah (SPM) in Indonesia, with the institution anonymized to ensure confidentiality. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observations, and reflective document analysis, and were validated through data triangulation and analyzed using an interactive thematic analysis approach. The findings indicate that rigid application of digital metrics may produce context-insensitive evaluations by reducing complex professional responsibilities and forms of spiritual service to quantifiable indicators. Participants also associated such practices with perceptions of procedural injustice, reduced motivation, and diminished emotional well-being. Ethical leadership emerged as a critical mediating mechanism through which transparency, fairness, accountability, and human-centered empathy were incorporated into data-informed evaluation processes. Rather than treating digital metrics as definitive representations of professional performance, leaders engaged in qualitative verification, contextual interpretation, and dialogic clarification before making evaluative decisions. The study contributes to the literature by identifying human mediation of digital performance metrics as a context-sensitive leadership mechanism within a values-based Islamic educational ecosystem. Drawing on the case findings, the study proposes an Integrated Ethical Leadership Framework grounded in a human-in-the-loop evaluation of digital metrics approach. The framework positions digital metrics as decision-support information rather than autonomous determinants of evaluation and offers an operational basis for educational leaders and policymakers seeking to strengthen digital evaluation practices while preserving professional dignity and educators’ psychosocial well-being.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Halbusi, H., Ruiz-Palomino, P., Jimenez-Estevez, P., & Gutiérrez-Broncano, S. (2021). How upper/middle managers’ ethical leadership activates employee ethical behavior? The role of organizational justice perceptions among employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 652471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652471
Alkabbany, I., Ali, A., Foreman, C., Tretter, T., Hindy, N., & Farag, A. (2023). An Experimental Platform for Real-Time Students Engagement Measurements from Video in STEM Classrooms. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031614
Ansyari, M. F., Groot, W., & De Witte, K. (2020). Tracking the process of data use professional development interventions for instructional improvement: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 31, 100362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100362
Archer, E., Young, K., Grover, R., & Khalil, M. (2025). Editorial: Educational evaluation in the age of artificial intelligence: challenges and innovations. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1612274
Bahri, R., Hilmy, M., Mukhlishah, Kurniawan, R., Niam, K., Warits, A., & Paisun. (2026). Moral leadership development in Indonesian Islamic boarding schools: a comparative study of two pesantren. British Journal of Religious Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2026.2627921
Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119
Benlian, A., Wiener, M., Cram, W. A., Krasnova, H., Maedche, A., Möhlmann, M., Recker, J., & Remus, U. (2022). Algorithmic Management: A. Benlian et al. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 64(6), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-022-00764-w
Berges-Puyó, J. G. (2022). Ethical leadership in education: A uniting view through ethics of care, justice, critique, and heartful education. Journal of Culture and Values in Education.
Binns, R. (2022). Human Judgment in algorithmic loops: Individual justice and automated decision‐making. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12358
Birnhack, M., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2021). Differential rights consciousness: Teachers’ perceptions of privacy in the surveillance school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103302
Bowdler, M., Lahti, H., Jelenko, M., Buresti, G., & Valtonen, T. (2025). Algorithmic management and psychosocial risks at work: An emerging occupational safety and health challenge. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 52, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4270
Calderwood, S. J. (2026). Surveillance digitisation, performativity, and teacher-student relationships in a blended learning setting. Postdigital Science and Education, 8(2), 500–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00537-6
Cefaliello, A., Moore, P. V, & Donoghue, R. (2023). Making algorithmic management safe and healthy for workers: Addressing psychosocial risks in new legal provisions. European Labour Law Journal, 14(2), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231167476
Cheng, J., Bai, H., & Hu, C. (2022). The relationship between ethical leadership and employee voice: The roles of error management climate and organizational commitment. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.49
Cheng, J., Sun, X., Lu, J., & He, Y. (2022). How ethical leadership prompts employees’ voice behavior? The roles of employees’ affective commitment and moral disengagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 732463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732463
Creagh, S., Thompson, G., Mockler, N., Stacey, M., & Hogan, A. (2025). Workload, work intensification and time poverty for teachers and school leaders: A systematic research synthesis. Educational Review, 77(2), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2196607
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=nFr2EAAAQBAJ
Daliri-Ngametua, R., Hardy, I., & Creagh, S. (2022). Data, performativity and the erosion of trust in teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(3), 391–407.
de-Torres, E., Canaleta, X., Fonseca, D., & Alsina, M. (2024). Automated monitoring of human–computer interaction for assessing teachers’ digital competence based on LMS data extraction. Sensors, 24(11), 3326. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113326
Dua, A. K., Farooq, A., & Rai, S. (2023). Ethical leadership and its influence on employee voice behavior: role of demographic variables. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(2), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2021-0200
Fawns, T., Aitken, G., & Jones, D. (2021). Ecological teaching evaluation vs the datafication of quality: Understanding education with, and around, data. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00109-4
Fernández-Batanero, J.-M., Román-Graván, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M.-M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548
Francis, D., Priyadarshini, R. G., & Jena, L. K. (2026). Rethinking ethical leadership: A philosophical anthropology of moral complexity and organizational power. Leadership, 22(3), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150261435530
Giamos, D., Doucet, O., & Lapalme, M.-È. (2025). What is known about development-oriented performance management practices? A scoping review. Human Resource Development Review, 24(1), 37–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843241278405
Glavin, P., Bierman, A., & Schieman, S. (2024). Private eyes, they see your every move: Workplace surveillance and worker well-being. Social Currents, 11(4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965241228874
Gore, J., Rickards, B., & Fray, L. (2023). From performative to professional accountability: Re-imagining ‘the field of judgment’through teacher professional development. Journal of Education Policy, 38(3), 452–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2080274
Grant, L. (2024). Data infrastructuring in schools: New forms of professional edu-data expertise and agency. Research in Education, 120(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237241257177
Green, B. (2022). The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms. Computer Law & Security Review, 45, 105681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105681
Grønsund, T., & Aanestad, M. (2020). Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(2), 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101614
Haar, J., Roche, M., & Brougham, D. (2019). Indigenous insights into ethical leadership: A study of Māori leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3869-3
Hakimi, L., Eynon, R., & Murphy, V. A. (2021). The ethics of using digital trace data in education: A thematic review of the research landscape. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 671–717. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211020116
Hardy, I. (2021). The quandary of quantification: Data, numbers and teachers’ learning. Journal of Education Policy, 36(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1672211
Hardy, I. (2022). Affective learning for effective learning? Data, numbers and teachers’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 116, 103754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103754
Häußermann, J. J., & Lütge, C. (2022). Community-in-the-loop: towards pluralistic value creation in AI, or—why AI needs business ethics. AI and Ethics, 2(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00047-2
Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., & Hlosta, M. (2019). A large-scale implementation of predictive learning analytics in higher education: the teachers’ role and perspective: C. Herodotou et al. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1273–1306.
Holloway, J., & Lewis, S. (2022). Governing teachers through datafication: Physical–virtual hybridity and language interoperability in teacher accountability. Big Data & Society, 9(2), 20539517221137550. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221137553
Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 20539517211020332. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332
Kalimullina, O., Tarman, B., & Stepanova, I. (2021). Education in the context of digitalization and culture. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(1), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/629
Kalischko, T., & Riedl, R. (2021). Electronic performance monitoring in the digital workplace: conceptualization, review of effects and moderators, and future research opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 633031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633031
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Kinowska, H., & Sienkiewicz, Ł. J. (2023). Influence of algorithmic management practices on workplace well-being–evidence from European organisations. Information Technology & People, 36(8), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2022-0079
Krein, U. (2025). Exploring the transformative impact of technology on school leadership. Affordances, practices, implications. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 24(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2440902
Lam, L. W., Loi, R., Chan, K. W., & Liu, Y. (2016). Voice more and stay longer: How ethical leaders influence employee voice and exit intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.30
Lamers, L., Meijerink, J., Jansen, G., & Boon, M. (2022). A capability approach to worker dignity under algorithmic management. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09637-y
Langer, M., & König, C. J. (2023). Introducing a multi-stakeholder perspective on opacity, transparency and strategies to reduce opacity in algorithm-based human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100881
Lewis, S., & Holloway, J. (2019). Datafying the teaching ‘profession’: Remaking the professional teacher in the image of data. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441373
Liu, R., & Li, X. (2026). Digital technology anxiety and teacher digital literacy development: a longitudinal examination of cognitive appraisal mechanisms. BMC Psychology, 14(1), 527. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04317-8
Liu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Research on University Teachers’ Perceptions of Gen‐AI From the Perspective of Actor‐Network Theory. Complexity, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1155/cplx/8885265
Lu, A., Dillahunt, T., Marcu, G., & Ackerman, M. (2021). Data Work in Education: Enacting and Negotiating Care and Control in Teachers’ Use of Data-Driven Classroom Surveillance Technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479596
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Masaeed, M., Shehada, S. A. J., & Mersal, M. A. S. (2025). The effect of digital transformation on teacher performance evaluation in Palestinian schools. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1440731
Mbabazi, A., Bagiwa, Z. L., Muhammad, T., & Aja, L. (2025). The Role of Output Monitoring and Review on Teacher Job Performance in Secondary Schools: Evidence from Kasese District, Uganda. F1000Research, 14. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.166552.1
McDermott, A. M., Conway, E., Cafferkey, K., Bosak, J., & Flood, P. C. (2019). Performance management in context: formative cross-functional performance monitoring for improvement and the mediating role of relational coordination in hospitals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(3), 436–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1278714
Meijerink, J., & Bondarouk, T. (2023). The duality of algorithmic management: Toward a research agenda on HRM algorithms, autonomy and value creation. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100876
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Bt0uuQEACAAJ
Nagtegaal, R. (2021). The impact of using algorithms for managerial decisions on public employees’ procedural justice. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101536
Ndukwe, I. G., & Daniel, B. K. (2020). Teaching analytics, value and tools for teacher data literacy: A systematic and tripartite approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00201-6
Nemorin, S. (2017). Post-panoptic pedagogies: the changing nature of school surveillance in the digital age. Surveillance and Society, 15, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i2.6033
Newman, D. T., Fast, N. J., & Harmon, D. J. (2020). When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.008
Noponen, N., Feshchenko, P., Auvinen, T., Luoma-Aho, V., & Abrahamsson, P. (2024). Taylorism on steroids or enabling autonomy? A systematic review of algorithmic management. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1695–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00345-5
Okoye, A., Njeje, D., & Kiflemariam, A. (2025). The Role of E-Performance Appraisal Information System on Teacher Performance. African Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.3318
Page, D. (2017). The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching. Journal of Education Policy, 32, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1209566
Pangrazio, L., Auld, G., Lynch, J., Sawatzki, C., Duffy, G., Hannigan, S., & O’Mara, J. (2024). Data justice in education: Toward a research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2320196
Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Parker, S. K. (2022). Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838
Rahm, L. (2021). Educational imaginaries: governance at the intersection of technology and education. Journal of Education Policy, 38, 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2021.1970233
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Rakhmetov, M., Sadvakassova, A., Saltanova, G., Kuanbayeva, B., & Zhusupkalieva, G. (2025). Evaluation of an AI-Based Feedback System for Enhancing Self-Regulated Learning in Digital Education Platforms. Electronic Journal of E-Learning. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.4.4150
Ravid, D. M., Tomczak, D. L., White, J. C., & Behrend, T. S. (2020). EPM 20/20: A review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring. Journal of Management, 46(1), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319869435
Ravid, D. M., White, J. C., Tomczak, D. L., Miles, A. F., & Behrend, T. S. (2023). A meta‐analysis of the effects of electronic performance monitoring on work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 76(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12514
Sahlin, J., & Angelis, J. (2019). Performance management systems: reviewing the rise of dynamics and digitalization. Cogent Business & Management, 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1642293
Sele, D., & Chugunova, M. (2024). Putting a human in the loop: Increasing uptake, but decreasing accuracy of automated decision-making. Plos One, 19(2), e0298037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298037
Selwyn, N. (2023). “There is a danger we get too robotic”: An investigation of institutional data logics within secondary schools. Educational Review, 75(3), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931039
Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2020). The datafication of higher education: Discussing the promises and problems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1689388
Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., & Johnson, N. (2017). High-tech, hard work: An investigation of teachers’ work in the digital age. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1252770
Setiawan, A. I., Abidin, Y. Z., Rustandi, R., Sarbini, A., & Aziz, R. (2026). Transforming Religious Education Through Inclusivity: How Indonesian Pesantren Cultivate Moderate Islamic Values and Da’wah Practices. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v9i1.406
Shah, B., Iqbal, F., Ilyas, M., Maqbool, F., & Rocha, Á. (2022). DeepClassRooms: a deep learning based digital twin framework for on-campus class rooms. Neural Computing & Applications, 35, 8017–8026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06754-5
Smeplass, E., & Haugseth, J. F. (2025). Digital teaching and engagement in Nordic contemporary settings: tensions in educational practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2025.2554879
Sobuwa, S., Bingwa, N., Managa, M., Hintsho-Mbita, N., Tyasi, T. L., & Maseko, B. (2026). From metrics to meaning in research evaluation. South African Journal of Science. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2026/22825
Stevenson, H. (2017). The “datafication” of teaching: Can teachers speak back to the numbers? Peabody Journal of Education, 92(4), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1349492
Thoutenhoofd, E. D. (2018). The datafication of learning: Data technologies as reflection issue in the system of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37(5), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9584-1
Tinguely, P. N., Lee, J., & He, V. F. (2023). Designing human resource management systems in the age of AI. Journal of Organization Design, 12(4), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00153-x
Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. (2023). Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9
Uzir, N. A., Gašević, D., Matcha, W., Jovanović, J., & Pardo, A. (2019). Analytics of time management strategies in a flipped classroom. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 36, 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12392
Van Leeuwen, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of the usability of learning analytics reports in a flipped university course: when and how does information become actionable knowledge? A. Leeuwen. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09639-y
Viberg, O., Mutimukwe, C., Hrastinski, S., Cerratto‐Pargman, T., & Lilliesköld, J. (2024). Exploring teachers’(future) digital assessment practices in higher education: Instrument and model development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2597–2616. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13462
Williamson, B., Bayne, S., & Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in Higher Education: critical issues and perspectives. In Teaching in higher education (Vol. 25, Number 4, pp. 351–365). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811
Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2019). Objectivity as standardization in data-scientific education policy, technology and governance. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556215
Wise, A. F., & Jung, Y. (2019). Teaching with analytics: Towards a situated model of instructional decision-making. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.4
Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Ngo, H. (2016). Ethical leadership behavior and employee justice perceptions: The mediating role of trust in organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2457-4
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=p_2gzwEACAAJ
Ying, J., & Jackson, L. (2025). Beyond dichotomy: teachers’ moral educational roles in changing China. Journal of Education for Teaching, 51(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2025.2480075
Zheng, W., Rahmat, M. M., Juhdi, N. H., Ghazali, M. F., & Na, M. (2026). Relative devaluation in AI transitions: an organizational behavior perspective on career sustainability beyond well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1822711
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
