An RP-HPLC-UV Method for the Determination of Inorganic Mercury (II) via Sulfur-Donor Ligand Complexation and Ion-Pair Retention

Tahir Bakhsh, Nazhifa Jacinda Maheswari Abidin, Hermin Sulistyarti, Ani Mulyasuryani

Abstract

Mercury contamination in artisanal and small-scale gold mining regions requires accessible analytical methods, yet established techniques demand dedicated atomic spectrometry instrumentation. This study developed a reversed-phase HPLC-UV method for inorganic mercury(II) based on sulfur-donor ligand complexation and ion-pair retention on a conventional C18 column. Thiocyanate and L-cysteine were evaluated using tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAH) as the ion-pairing reagent. Ultraviolet spectra recorded within the linear response range of the instrument placed the Hg-SCN absorption maximum at 240 nm, and detection was performed at 245 nm. A 1:16 Hg(II): SCN⁻ molar ratio and a final mobile-phase TBAH concentration of 8 mM (acetonitrile 70%, methanol 20%, aqueous TBAH 10% v/v) produced a dominant chromatographic peak. Against an experimentally measured void time of 2.70 min, retention changed regime rather than increasing progressively: the peak eluted before the void volume at 0.5 and 2 mM TBAH (k′ = -0.36) and was retained at 8 mM (k′ = +0.42). Calibration over 0.125-0.500 mM (25.1-100.3 mg/L), using seven independently prepared levels in triplicate, gave R² = 0.9929, an LOD of 0.033 mM (6.5 mg/L) and an LOQ of 0.109 mM (21.8 mg/L), the LOQ lying below the lowest calibration level. Retention-time and peak-area repeatability were 0.80% and 1.96% RSD, and mean recovery from spiked reagent water was 93.8%.  Specificity and matrix effects were not assessed. The validated range lies four orders of magnitude above drinking-water guideline values, so the method is intended as a preliminary procedure for concentrated process and waste streams rather than for environmental monitoring or mercury speciation

Keywords

Mercury (II), ion-pair RP-HPLC-UV, Thiocyanate, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, Complexation

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] G. Bjørklund, M. Dadar, J. Mutter, and J. Aaseth, “The toxicology of mercury: Current research and emerging trends,” Environ. Res., vol. 159, pp. 545–554, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.051.

[2] A. E. Charkiewicz, W. J. Omeljaniuk, M. Garley, and J. Nikliński, “Mercury Exposure and Health Effects: What Do We Really Know?,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 26, no. 5, Art. no. 2326, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ijms26052326.

[3] B. M. Saalidong and S. A. Aram, “Mercury Exposure in Artisanal Mining: Assessing the Effect of Occupational Activities on Blood Mercury Levels Among Artisanal and Small-Scale Goldminers in Ghana,” Biol. Trace Elem. Res., vol. 200, no. 10, pp. 4256–4266, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12011-021-03025-1.

[4] L. J. Esdaile and J. M. Chalker, “The Mercury Problem in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining,” Chem. Eur. J., vol. 24, no. 27, pp. 6905–6916, May 2018, doi: 10.1002/chem.201704840.

[5] A. Abdelaal, M. Sultan, A. Z. Abotalib, M. Bedair, R. V. Krishnamurthy, and M. Elhebiry, “Emerging mercury and methylmercury contamination from new artisanal and small-scale gold mining along the Nile Valley, Egypt,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 52514–52534, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25895-9.

[6] S. Ali, M. Mansha, N. Baig, and S. A. Khan, “Recent Trends and Future Perspectives of Emergent Analytical Techniques for Mercury Sensing in Aquatic Environments,” Chem. Rec., vol. 22, no. 7, Art. no. e202100327, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1002/tcr.202100327.

[7] L. N. Suvarapu and S.-O. Baek, “Recent Studies on the Speciation and Determination of Mercury in Different Environmental Matrices Using Various Analytical Techniques,” Int. J. Anal. Chem., vol. 2017, Art. no. 3624015, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/3624015.

[8] K. A. Anderson, “Mercury Analysis in Environmental Samples by Cold Vapor Techniques,” in Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, 2006, doi: 10.1002/9780470027318.a0841.

[9] C. S. Provete, B. M. Dalfior, R. Mantovaneli, M. T. W. D. Carneiro, and G. P. Brandão, “Comparison of the Performance of ICP-MS, CV-ICP-OES, and TDA AAS in Determining Mercury in Marine Sediment Samples,” ACS Omega, vol. 9, no. 50, pp. 49229–49238, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06144.

[10] S. Río-Segade and C. Bendicho, “On-line high-performance liquid-chromatographic separation and cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometric determination of methylmercury and inorganic mercury,” Talanta, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 477–484, Feb. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0039-9140(98)00269-0.

[11] H. Hashemi-Moghaddam and M. Saber-Tehrani, “Sensitive Mercury Speciation by Reversed-Phase Column High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with UV-Visible Detection After Solid-Phase Extraction Using 6-Mercaptopurine and Dithizone,” J. AOAC Int., vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 1453–1458, 2008, doi: 10.1093/jaoac/91.6.1453.

[12] M. Thirumalai, S. N. Kumar, D. Prabhakaran, N. Sivaraman, and M. A. Maheswari, “Dynamically modified C18 silica monolithic column for the rapid determinations of lead, cadmium and mercury ions by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography,” J. Chromatogr. A, vol. 1569, pp. 62–69, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.07.044.

[13] M. V. K. Le, N. Pourzadi, and J. Gailer, “Retention behavior of Hg2+, MeHg+, thimerosal and phenylmercuric acetate on a C18 RP-HPLC column,” J. Chromatogr. A, vol. 1739, Art. no. 465546, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465546.

[14] P. Delre et al., “Shedding light on the HSAB-guided sulfur–selenium antagonism in mercury coordination and reactivity toward biologically relevant systems: a DFT and MD study,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 27, no. 31, pp. 16644–16663, 2025, doi: 10.1039/D5CP01736J.

[15] S. Maharjan, Y. J. Yun, V. A. Okello, G. P. Wiederrecht, D. J. Gosztola, and A. J.-L. Ayitou, “Photometric sensing of heavy metal ions using a naphthoquinodimethyl-bis-thioamide dye: Selectivity & photophysics of the metal organic complexes,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., vol. 424, Art. no. 113648, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113648.

[16] M. T. W. Hearn, “Ion-Pair Chromatography on Normal- and Reversed-Phase Systems,” in Advances in Chromatography, vol. 18, pp. 59–100, 1980, doi: 10.1201/9781003209942-2.

[17] H. Cheng, X. Chen, L. Shen, Y. Wang, Z. Xu, and J. Liu, “Ion-pairing reversed-phase chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry as a tool to determine mercurial species in freshwater fish,” J. Chromatogr. A, vol. 1531, pp. 104–111, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.11.029.

[18] M. Riaz and S. B. Butt, “Influence of the Lipophilicity of an Ion-Pairing Reagent on Metal Ion Separation using Ion-Pair HPLC,” J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., vol. 29, no. 20, pp. 2975–2987, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1080/10826070600981090.

[19] J. Dai and P. W. Carr, “Role of ion pairing in anionic additive effects on the separation of cationic drugs in reversed-phase liquid chromatography,” J. Chromatogr. A, vol. 1072, no. 2, pp. 169–184, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.03.005.

[20] T. Cecchi, “Theoretical Models of Ion Pair Chromatography: A Close Up of Recent Literature Production,” J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 404–414, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1080/10826076.2014.941267.

[21] D. Riccardi et al., “Why Mercury Prefers Soft Ligands,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 2317–2322, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1021/jz401075b.

[22] N. Tanaka, K. Ebata, and T. Murayama, “Potentiometric Determination of the Formation Constants of Thiocyanato Complexes of Mercury(II),” Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 124–129, Jan. 1962, doi: 10.1246/bcsj.35.124.

[23] K. Popov, H. Rönkkömäki, and L. Lajunen, “Critical evaluation of stability constants of phosphonic acids (IUPAC Technical Report),” Pure Appl. Chem., vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 2227–2227, 2002, doi: 10.1351/pac200274112227.

[24] E. Elijošiutė, O. Eicher-Lorka, E. Griškonis, I. Matulaitienė, D. Jankūnaitė, and G. Denafas, “Molecular structure of mercury(II) thiocyanate complexes based on DFT calculations and experimental UV-electron spectroscopy and Raman studies,” Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., vol. 115, pp. 574–582, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.06.072.

[25] J. Watts, E. Howell, and J. K. Merle, “Theoretical studies of complexes between Hg(II) ions and L-cysteinate amino acids,” Int. J. Quantum Chem., vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 333–339, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1002/qua.24565.

[26] P. Cardiano, G. Falcone, C. Foti, and S. Sammartano, “Sequestration of Hg2+ by Some Biologically Important Thiols,” J. Chem. Eng. Data, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 4741–4750, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1021/je200735r.

[27] Y. Song, T. Jiang, V. Liem-Nguyen, T. Sparrman, E. Björn, and U. Skyllberg, “Thermodynamics of Hg(II) Bonding to Thiol Groups in Suwannee River Natural Organic Matter Resolved by Competitive Ligand Exchange, Hg LIII-Edge EXAFS and 1H NMR Spectroscopy,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 52, no. 15, pp. 8292–8301, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00919.

[28] F. Jalilehvand, B. O. Leung, M. Izadifard, and E. Damian, “Mercury(II) cysteine complexes in alkaline aqueous solution,” Inorg. Chem., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2006, doi: 10.1021/ic0508932.

[29] J. Zhang et al., “Quantification of Trace Mercury in Water: Solving the Problem of Adsorption, Sample Preservation, and Cross-Contamination,” Glob. Chall., vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1900061, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1002/gch2.201900061.

[30] International Council for Harmonisation, “ICH Harmonised Guideline Q2(R2): Validation of Analytical Procedures,” International Council for Harmonisation (ICH), Nov. 2023.

[31] International Council for Harmonisation, “ICH Harmonised Guideline Q14: Analytical Procedure Development,” International Council for Harmonisation (ICH), Nov. 2023.

[32] J. Uhrovčík, “Strategy for determination of LOD and LOQ values—Some basic aspects,” Talanta, vol. 119, pp. 178–180, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.10.061.

[33] T. Yamaguchi, K. Yamamoto, and H. Ohtaki, “X-Ray Diffraction, Raman, and NMR Studies on Tetrathiocyanato Complexes of Zinc(II), Cadmium(II), and Mercury(II) Ions in Aqueous Solution,” Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 3235–3243, 1985, doi: 10.1246/bcsj.58.3235.

[34] M. Radulescu and V. David, “PARTITION VERSUS ELECTROSTATIC MODEL APPLIED TO THE ION-PAIRING RETENTION PROCESS OF SOME GUANIDINE BASED COMPOUNDS,” J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 2042–2053, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1080/10826076.2011.627619.

[35] S. E. Birnie, “Automated continuous monitoring of inorganic and total mercury in wastewater and other waters by flow-injection analysis and cold-vapour atomic absorption spectrometry,” J. Autom. Chem., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 140–143, 1988, doi: 10.1155/S1463924688000264.

[36] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.

B. Passariello, M. Barbaro, S. Quaresima, A. Casciello, and A. Marabini, “Determination of Mercury by Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass Spectrometry,” Microchem. J., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 348–354, Nov. 1996, doi: 10.1006/mchj.1996.0110

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v11i2.122567

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share