Efektivitas Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman
Abstract
Abstract
The research aims to examine the effectiveness of understanding reading ability of elementary school. It is between experimental classes implementing the PBL learning model and control classes applying direct instruction learning. This research uses quantitative approaches with experimental quasi methods. The research design uses Nonequivalent Control Groups Design (NCGD). The research subjects are primary schools in Depok District Cirebon Regency. The instruments are understanding reading worksheets. The data collection techniques are pre test and post test. It concludes that the PBL models are more effective in enhancing the reading comprehension skills than the control class using conventional learning.
Keyword: problem based learning model, understanding reading ability
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas kemampuan membaca pemahaman siswa sekolah dasar antara kelas eksperimen yang menerapkan model pembelajaran PBL dengan kelas kontrol yang menerapkan pembelajaran direct instruction. Dalam penelitian ini digunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode kuasi eksperimen. Desain penelitian menggunakan Nonequivalent Control Groups Design (NCGD). Sekolah yang akan dijadikan lokasi penelitian adalah Sekolah Dasar yang berada di lingkungan UPT Kecamatan Depok Kabupaten Cirebon. Instrumen berupa lembar soal membaca pemahaman. Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu prates dan post tes. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa model PBL lebih efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan membaca pemahaman dibandingkan kelas kontrol yang menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional.
Kata kunci: model problem based learning, kemampuan membaca pemahaman.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abidin, Y. (2013). Pengembangan Model Penilaian Otentik dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman di Sekolah Dasar. Disertasi. (Tidak diterbitkan), Bandung: UPI.
Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Arends Richard I. (2008). Learning to Teach: Belajar untuk Mengajar. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.
Concannon-Gibney, T. dan McCarthy, M.J. (2012). The Explicit Teaching of Reading Comprehension in Science Class: a Pilot Professional Development Program. Improving Schools. 15 (1). 73–88.
Croninger, R.G. danValli, L. .(2009). Where Is the Action?' Challenges to Studying the Teaching of Reading in Elementary Classrooms. Educational Researcher. 38 (2). 100–108.
Febriyanto (2016). Penerapan Model Cooperative Integrated Reading And Composition Dalam Pembelajaran Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas. 2 (2). 42-57.
Gunantara G, Suarjana M, Riastini, N. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas V. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Vol: 2 No: 1. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD.
Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik Dan Kontekstual Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21 Kunci Suskes Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Jhonson, P. Andrew. (2008). Teaching And Writing: Guidebook For Tutoring And Remediating Students. New York: United Kingdom.
OECD. (2013). Literacy Skills for Tomorrow: Futher Results From PISA 2000. Canada: OECD.
O'Reilly, T. dan McNamara, D.S. (2007). The Impact of Science Knowledge, Reading Skill, and Reading Strategy Knowledge on More Traditional ''High-Stakes'' Measures of High School Students' Science Achievement. American Educational Research Journal. 44 (1). 161–196.
Rayner, K. et al. (2001). How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading. Psychological Science in The Public Interest. 2 (2).31 – 74.
Sugiyono. (2013). Model Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Swanson, E., et al. (2011). Applying a Cohesive Set of Comprehension Strategies to Content-Area Instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic. 46 (5). 266–272
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
