Publication Ethic

Plagiarism Checker

The article that can be reviewed by editor board after completing the attachment of plagiarism checker and stated that article at least 80% is the origin. The following are the tools of checker:

1. Plagiarisma
2. Duplicity-Checker 
3. Turnitin
4. Plagiarism Checker
5. Other tools of plagiarism

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Sebelas Maret University as publisher of DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Publication decisions

The editor of the DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Screening for Plagiarism Policy

All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software for similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal using Turnitin software at the beginning of submission. The maximum similarity is 20%.

Copyright & Licensing

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain the copyright of their article without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work, with the condition that it is not intended for commercial purposes, and cite an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). However, authors are not allowed to share their work with other journals or publishers as it may lead to conflicting publication processes.

Revenue Sources

This journal is financially supported through institutional support and author fees. We ensure that the availability of institutional funding or the payment of author fees, or even waiver status, does not influence editorial decision-making in any way. All submissions undergo a rigorous and impartial peer-review process to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity.

Advertising policy

1. All advertisements and commercially sponsored publications are independent from editorial decisions. The Editorial board does not endorse any product or service marked as an advertisement or promoted by a sponsor in DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik publications. Editorial content is not compromised by commercial or financial interests, or by any specific arrangements with advertising clients or sponsors.
2. The DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik management reserves the right to decline any type of advertising that is damaging to the brand of DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik or is inappropriate to the content held on the journal.
3. The will not accept advertising for products or services known to be harmful to health (e.g. tobacco and alcohol products).
4. Advertisements may not be deceptive or misleading, and must be verifiable. Advertisements should clearly identify the advertiser and the product or service being offered. Exaggerated or extravagantly worded copy will not be allowed. Advertisements will not be accepted if they appear to be indecent or offensive in either text or artwork, or if they relate to content of a personal, racial, ethnic, sexual orientation, or religious nature.
5. Once an advertisement has been deployed online, it will be withdrawn from the site at any time if the Editor(s)-in-Chief or Publisher request its removal.
6. The DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik will not allow any treatment-specific or drug-specific campaign to be targeted to a specific article(s) or on any page where content relates to the product(s) being advertised. (Advertisers may not link to articles using keywords; they may not target advertising for a specific product on the condition that it appear in the same location and at the same time as a specific article mentioning that product and they may not refer to an article published at the same time as the advertisement appears).
7. Advertisements and editorial content must be clearly distinguishable. The will not publish “advertorial” content, and sponsored supplements must be clearly indicated as such. If a supplement did not undergo peer review or underwent a peer review-process different from the rest of the that should be explicitly stated.
8. Editorial decisions will not be influenced by current or potential sponsors and advertisers, and will not be influenced by marketing decisions. Advertisers and sponsors have no control or influence over the results of searches a user may conduct on the website by keyword or search topic.
9. If any advert is requested outside of standard advertising positions then a request should be made to editorial who will respond with a full and final decision within three business days.
10. Information about complaints concerning advertisements will be included in the Advertisements page.
11. We partner with third-party advertising companies to serve ads and/or collect certain information when you visit our website. These companies may use cookies or web beacons to collect non-personally identifiable information [not including your name, address, email address or telephone number] during your visit to this website to help show advertisements on other websites also likely to be of interest to you. 

Advertising complaints policy

Please send any complaints about advertising to: jurnaldwijacendekia@mail.uns.ac.id

Direct Marketing Policy

DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik  does not carry out any direct marketing like Direct Mail, Telemarketing, Direct Response Advertising to authors, or calls for papers. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik does not use any direct marketing consists of promotion, communications activity sent directly to authors or companies to submit any articles to journal issues. 

It’s important to note that not all marketing is good marketing especially for research journals direct marketing techniques contain negative elements that impact the global authentic research field. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik believes in authentic research and publication with a double-blind peer-reviewed process. 

Generative AI (GenAI) Policy

Generative AI (GenAI) presents opportunities and challenges in scientific research and academic publishing. At DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, we recognize the transformative potential of GenAI in enhancing research efficiency and creativity while also addressing the ethical and transparency concerns it raises. This policy outlines our principles, expectations, and technical guidance for using GenAI in the preparation, review, and publication of manuscripts, ensuring accountability, integrity, and trust in scientific publishing.

DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik encourages authors, reviewers, and editors to adhere to this policy to uphold the highest ethical and professional standards in academic research and publishing.

1. Transparency in Use of GenAI
DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik requires authors to disclose the use of GenAI tools, such as Grook-AI, ChatGPT, GPT-4, Bard, or similar technologies, in any aspect of their manuscript preparation. This includes, but is not limited to, drafting text, enhancing grammar, performing data analysis, or generating visualizations.

Authors must include a clear statement in the acknowledgments section or as a footnote in the manuscript, specifying the tool used and the purpose. For example:
"This manuscript utilized ChatGPT (OpenAI) for drafting text and refining grammar. All content was reviewed and validated by the authors."

Failure to disclose the use of GenAI tools may be considered a breach of publishing ethics.

2. Accountability and Authorship
The use of GenAI does not absolve authors of their responsibility for the content of the manuscript. Authors remain fully accountable for the originality, accuracy, and integrity of their submissions, including any content generated with GenAI assistance.

GenAI tools cannot be listed as authors, as they do not meet the criteria for authorship, including the ability to take responsibility for the work. Authors must ensure that all GenAI outputs are accurate, free of bias, and comply with ethical standards.

3. Ethical Compliance
The use of GenAI in the preparation of manuscripts must adhere to DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik's ethical guidelines, including:

• Prohibiting the generation of fabricated or manipulated data.
• Avoiding reliance on GenAI for generating references or citations, as these tools may produce inaccurate or fictitious sources.
• Ensuring all content produced with GenAI is verified for accuracy and originality.

Undisclosed or unethical use of GenAI tools will be treated as a violation of publishing ethics.

4. Peer Review Process
DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik does not utilize GenAI tools in the peer review process. Manuscripts are evaluated by qualified human reviewers who apply their expertise and judgment to assess the quality and merit of submissions.

Reviewers are also discouraged from using GenAI tools to evaluate manuscripts to ensure that all assessments reflect their professional expertise.

5. Editorial and Publishing Practices
While DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik reserves the right to use GenAI tools for auxiliary tasks such as grammar checking, similarity detection, or editorial efficiency, all editorial decisions are made by human editors. Outputs generated by GenAI are carefully reviewed to ensure they meet the journal's high standards.

Authors are encouraged to use GenAI-based tools for tasks such as language polishing but must disclose their usage during submission.

6. Technical Guidance for Authors
To ensure compliance with this policy, authors should follow these steps:

1. Clearly disclose the use of GenAI tools, specifying their purpose, in the manuscript.
2. Verify all GenAI-generated content for accuracy, originality, and compliance with ethical guidelines.
3. Use plagiarism-detection tools to ensure that GenAI outputs do not inadvertently replicate existing content.
4. Avoid relying on GenAI for tasks requiring critical intellectual contributions, such as hypothesis formulation or complex data interpretation.
5. Manually verify all references and citations included in the manuscript.

7. Continuous Review
As GenAI technologies evolve, DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik will periodically review and update this policy to reflect advancements and align with emerging best practices in academic publishing.