Analysis of Success Factor of The E-Learning System Using Delone and Mclean Models

Hidayat Ramadhani Winarno, Nilo Legowo

Abstract


The effectiveness of e-learning systems has become a focal point in modern education, particularly with the global shift towards digital learning environments. This study employs the DeLone and McLean  Model, integrating the Technology Self-Efficacy (TSE) variable, to analyze the critical factors influencing e-learning success. Key dimensions, including information quality, system quality, service quality, system use, and user satisfaction, were evaluated through a comprehensive methodology involving Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). Data collected from 283 high school students in a suburban area reveal significant relationships, highlighting the pivotal roles of technology self-efficacy and system use in driving user satisfaction and overall e-learning success. The findings underscore that system use directly influences educational outcomes, with students’ confidence in navigating e-learning platforms emerging as a critical determinant of user satisfaction. Despite these successes, service quality and information accuracy areas present opportunities for refinement to further enhance user engagement and satisfaction. The study also emphasizes the adaptability and scalability of the proposed model for broader applications in diverse educational settings. This research contributes valuable insights into optimizing e-learning systems by addressing user-centric and technical aspects, ultimately supporting more effective digital learning platforms. The integration of TSE with the DeLone and McLean Model provides a robust framework for understanding and improving e-learning systems, offering actionable strategies for educational institutions aiming to align with the evolving demands of 21st-century learning.


Keywords


E-Learning; Leaning Management System; Delone and McLean Model; SEM-PLS; E-Learning Success

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


REFERENCES Analysis INN. (2020, May 6). Cohen's f2: Definition, Criterion and Example. From ttps://www.analysisinn.com: https://www.analysisinn.com/post/cohen-s-f2-definition-criterion-and-example/ Analysis INN. (2020, April 26). Discriminant Validity through Fronell-Larcker Criterion, From ttps://www.analysisinn.com: s (Analysis INN) From https://www.analysisinn.com/post/discriminant-validity-through-fronell-larcker-criterion/ Arkorful, V. (2014). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348335311_The_role_of_e-learning_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_its_adoption_in_higher_education Cherry, K. (2024, April 4). What is the Likert Scale? Definition, Exles, and uses - Explore Psychology. Explore Psychology. https://www.explorepsychology.com/likert-scale-definition-examples-and-uses/ Dr. Muhammad Rusli, M. D. (2020). Apa itu E-Learning ? In M. D. Dr. Muhammad Rusli, Memahami E

Aghimien, D., Ikuabe, M., Aghimien, L., Aigbavboa, C., Ntebo, N., & Yankah, J. (2022). Please assess the impediments of robotics and automation deployment for effective construction health and safety. Journal of Facilities Management, 22(3), 458-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-04-2022-0037

Agourram, H., Alvarez, J., Sénécal, S., Lachize, S., Gagné, J., & Léger, P. M. (2019). The relationship between technology self-efficacy beliefs and user satisfaction–user experience perspective. In Human-Computer Interaction. Design Practice in Contemporary Societies: Thematic Area, HCI 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, July 26–31, 2019, Proceedings, Part III 21 (pp. 389-397). Springer International Publishing.

Al-Adwan, A., Albelbisi, N., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Developing a holistic success model for sustainable e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 13(16), 9453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169453

Aldholay, A., Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Abdulsalam, R., & Al-Shibami, A. (2018). An extension of DeLone and McLean IS the success model with self-efficacy. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-11-2017-0116

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education, 127, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.007

Alotaibi, R., & Alshahrani, S. (2022). An extended DeLone and McLean’s model to determine the success factors of e-learning platforms. PeerJ Computer Science, 8, e876. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.876

Anaam, E., Alyam, A., Ali, Y., Dauwed, M., Al-Shahrani, A., & Al-Nidawi, W. (2023). Application of the updated DeLone and McLean IS success method to investigate e-CRM effectiveness. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.02.016

Analysis INN. (2020, April 26). Discriminant validity through the Fornell-Larcker criterion. Retrieved from https://www.analysisinn.com/post/discriminant-validity-through-fronell-larcker-criterion

Analysis INN. (2020, May 6). Cohen's f2: Definition, criterion, and example. Retrieved from https://www.analysisinn.com/post/cohen-s-f2-definition-criterion-and-example

Avkiran, N. (2018). Measuring the systemic risk of regional banks in Japan with pls-sem. Theoretical Economics Letters, 08(11), 2024-2037. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2018.811132

Azeem, N. (2023). The mediating role of self-directed learning and e-learning readiness in the relationship between ICT self-efficacy and student engagement. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(II). https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-ii)26

Bakhri, S. (2021). Assessing information system success in e-learning. Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-10-2020.2303856

Chen, L., Tang, X., Liu, Q., & Zhang, X. (2023). Self-directed learning: Alternative for traditional classroom learning in undergraduate ophthalmic education during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Heliyon, 9(5), e15632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15632

Cherry, K. (2024, April 4). What is the Likert scale? Definition, examples, and uses. Explore Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.explorepsychology.com/likert-scale-definition-examples-and-uses

Chukwunemerem, O. (2023). Lessons from self-directed learning activities and helping university students think critically. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n2p79

Delone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220079763

Delone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220591866

Fauziah, D. (2023). Measuring quality of e-learning websites using webqual 4.0 method in higher education (case study: institute technology and science mandala). Inside, 1(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.31967/inside.v1i2.882

Fogg, E. (2021). eLearning development and the importance of testing. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/elearning-development-and-importance-of-testing

Fuzi, S. (2023). Examining demographic differences in online learning self-efficacy and online self-regulated learning. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3(I)), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i3(i).3554

Gupta, M. (2023). Technologies behind e-learning: A new paradigm of higher education. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4(1), 661–666. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.2023.4120

Harini, E. (2023). Effectiveness of e-worksheets on problem-solving skills: A study of students' self-directed learning in ratios. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v1i02.333

Hermita, M., Farida, E., Margianti, S., & Fanreza, R. (2019). The determinants and impact of system usage and satisfaction on e-learning success and faculty-student interaction in indonesian private universities. Malaysian J. Consum. Fam. Econ, 23, 85-99.

Humaidi, N., Seman, S. A. A., Imam, A. N. L., Fahrudi, S. F. A. K. J., & Jamil, N. A. (2021). User's Satisfaction Towards Course File Information System (CFIS): The Role of Green IT Attitude, Self-Efficacy and CFIS Training. Global Business and Management Research, 13(4), 207-224.

Ibrahim, S., Hassan, S., & Rasheed, M. (2022). The effect of noise exposure in residential buildings on student e-learning during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 26(6), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.26.6.7

Idkhan, A. (2023). The impact of user satisfaction in the use of e-learning systems in higher education: A CB-SEM approach. International Journal of Environment Engineering and Education, 5(3), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v5i3.91

Jelpan, M. (2023). Academic achievement of undergraduate nursing students in the nursing faculty before and during the coronavirus pandemic. Libyan Journal of Medical Research, 17(1), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.54361/ljmr.17-17

Joe Hair, M. S. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool for business research. European Business Review, 121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Jörg Henseler, C. M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 135.

Joseph Hair, A. A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2772766122000246

Kalankesh, L. R., Zakeri, F., & Pour, Z. (2020). Factors influencing user satisfaction with information systems: A systematic review. Galen Medical Journal/ResearchGate, 9. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/gmj.v9

Kim, K., Lee, Y., Lee, M., & Kim, Y. (2020). E-learning for enhancement of medical student performance at the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in the COVID-19 era. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-126355/v1

Kim, K., Trimi, S., Park, H., & Rhee, S. (2012). The impact of CMS quality on the outcomes of e-learning systems in higher education: An empirical study. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 10(4), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2012.00360.x

Liwanag, M. (2023). Technological self-efficacy, learning motivation, and self-directed learning of selected senior high school students in a blended learning environment. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 44, 534–559. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v44i1.8980

Mafazi, B. (2021). The analysis of e-learning success by using delone and mclean success model (case study: pertamina university). Journal of Information Technology and Its Utilization, 4(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.30818/jitu.4.1.3694

Masa’deh, R., et al. (2023). Evaluation of factors affecting university students' satisfaction with e-learning systems used during COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.11.003

Mihardi, S., Siregar, A., & S, A. (2022). Optimization of learning with Schoology for best practices in quality of learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v11i1.34767

Millidonis, T., Lois, P., & Georgiou, I. (2023). How teachers are affected by institutional actions aiming to enhance e-learning effectiveness in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(6/7), 1142–1161. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-09-2022-0371

Murniati, C., Hartono, H., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Self-directed learning, self-efficacy, and technology readiness in e-learning among university students. KNE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i14.11970

Nalintippayawong, S., Kladyoo, N., & Phengkhlai, J. (2023). Examining the critical success factors of e-learning using structural equation model. Current Applied Science and Technology, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.55003/cast.2023.06.23.001

NAM, S. (2023). The role of educational factors in the success of corporate e-learning: A case study. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1127801

Oktarin, I., Estisari, K., Wengrum, T., & Nurhantanto, A. (2023). Economic students’ perceptions towards learning management system (LMS). JAE, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33365/jae.v3i1.198

Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: Learning motivation as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294

Pham, L., Limbu, Y., Bui, T., Nguyen, H., & Pham, H. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3

Rahayu, D., & Setiyani, L. (2022). Systematic literature review: DeLone and McLean model using VOSviewer on Google Scholar database case year 2010–2020. International Journal of Science Technology & Management, 3(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v3i1.402

Rahman, A. (2024). Self-regulated learning, online learning self-efficacy, and satisfaction among accounting matriculation students in flipped learning environment. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (Mjssh), 9(4), e002725. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i4.2725

Raouna, K., & Raouna, K. (2024, January). What is an LMS (Learning Management System)? LearnWorlds. Retrieved from https://www.learnworlds.com/lms-learning-management-system/

Ronald D. Freeze, K. A. (2010). IS success model in e-learning context based on students' perceptions. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228365490

Rust, M. (2023). Incorporating an lms learning analytic into proactive advising: validity and use in a randomized experiment.. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/sjw2b

Sari, D. (2024). Does e-service for research and community service boost the performance of university lecturers? Journal of Education and Learning (Edulearn), 18(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20831

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J., Becker, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.03

Seta, H., Wati, T., Muliawati, A., & Hidayanto, A. (2018). E-learning success model: An extension of DeLone & McLean's IS Success Model. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 6(3), 505. https://doi.org/10.52549/ijeei.v6i3.505

Şumuer, E. (2018). Factors related to college students’ self-directed learning with technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3142

Suwarsono, L., Aisha, A., & Nugraha, F. (2024). Role of e-learning readiness on workload: Perspective engineering and non-engineering students. International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System, 6(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.25124/ijies.v6i01.165

Tariq, S., Ishak, K., & Nafi, S. (2018). Effect of human factors in the success of e-learning with the moderating effect of web self-efficacy in the context of Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Research, 6(11), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/8015

Tumurchudur, S., & Buyantur, O. (2022). Analysis of success factors of e-learning. Embedded Selforganising Systems, 9(4), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.14464/ess.v9i4.556

Tute, K., Londa, M., & Mude, A. (2022). DeLone and McLean models for measuring the success of Flores university e-learning information system. Matrix Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi Dan Informatika, 12(2), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.31940/matrix.v12i2.68-78

Uppal, M., Ali, S., & Gulliver, S. (2017). Factors determining e‐learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12552

Wolverton, C., Hollier, B., & Lanier, P. (2020). The impact of computer self-efficacy on student engagement and group satisfaction in online business courses. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.18.2.006

Yakubu, M., & Dasuki, S. (2018). Assessing e-learning systems success in Nigeria: An application of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 17, 183–203. https://doi.org/10.28945/4077

Zardari, B., Hussain, Z., Arain, A., Rizvi, W., & Vighio, M. (2021). Development and validation of user experience-based e-learning acceptance model for sustainable higher education. Sustainability, 13(11), 6201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116201

Zarei, S., & Mohammadi, S. (2021). Challenges of higher education related to e-learning in developing countries during COVID-19 spread: A review of the perspectives of students, instructors, policymakers, and ICT experts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(57), 85562–85568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14647-2

Zhou, J., & Yu, H. (2021). Contribution of social support to home-quarantined Chinese college students’ well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of online learning self-efficacy and moderating role of anxiety. Social Psychology of Education, 24(6), 1643–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09665-4

-learning: Konsep, Teknologi, dan Arah Perkembangan (p. 112). Penerbit Andi, 2020. Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and Explicit Learning, Knowledge and Instruction. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.21832/9781847691767-003/html: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.21832/9781847691767-003/html Fogg, E. (2021). eLearning Development And The Importance of Testing. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com: https://elearningindustry.com/elearning-development-and-importance-of-testing Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 Ghozali, I. (2008). Structural equation modeling: metode alternatif dengan partial least square (PLS). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Structural_equation_modeling.html?id=x1ZAngAACAAJ&redir_esc=y Harve, A. (2024, Januaryp). Key Metrics and Evaluation Strategies for Effective eLearning Programs. Digital Engineering & Technology | Elearning Solutions | Digital Content Solutions. https://www.hurix.com/key-metrics-and-evaluation-strategies-for-effective-elearning-programs/ Imam Ghozali, H. L. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com: https://www.scribd.com/document/607370154/Ghozali-dan-Latan-2015 Harve, A. (2024, Januaryp). Key Metrics and Evaluation Strategies for Effective eLearning Programs. Digital Engineering & Technology | Elearning Solutions | Digital Content Solutions. https://www.hurix.com/key-metrics-and-evaluation-strategies-for-effective-elearning-programs/ Jerry FitzGerald, A. F. (1981). Fundamentals of Systems Analysis. Wiley. Joe Hair, M. S. (2014). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool for Business Research. European Business Review, 121. Jörg Henseler, C. M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 135. Joseph Hair, A. A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2772766122000246 Juan Carlos Mavo Navarro, B. M. (2021, September). Strategies for Effective Online Teaching and Learning: Practices and Techniques With a Proven Track of Success in Online Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356007394_Strategies_for_Effective_Online_Teaching_and_Learning_Practices_and_Techniques_With_a_Proven_Track_of_Success_in_Online_Education Leila R Kalankesh, ,. Z. (2020). Factors Influencing User Satisfaction with Information Systems: A Systematic Review, Galen Medical Journal/ReserachGate, 9 Marko Sarsted, C. M. (2017, September). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319669432_Partial_Least_Squares_Structural_Equation_Modeling Matrissya Hermita, F. ,. (2019). The Determinants and Impact of System use and Satisfaction on E-LEarning Success and Faculty Student Interaction in Indonesian Private Universities. Malaysian Journal Of Consumer And Family Economics , 99 Nguyen, T. (2015, June). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308171318_The_Effectiveness_of_Online_Learning_Beyond_No_Significant_Difference_and_Future_Horizons Novita, R., & N. Sari. 2015. Sistem Informasi Penjualan Pupuk Berbasis E-Commers. ISSN: 2338-2724. Volume 3. No. 2. Oktober 2015. Jurnal Teknoif. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim. Riau Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L.; Parasuraman, A. 1996. The behavioral consequences of service quality. J. Mark. 60, 31–46. Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15. Rana Saeed Khadija Alhumaid, S. A. (2020). The Continuous Intention to Use E-Learning, from Two Different Perspectives. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347966330_The_Continuous_Intention_to_Use_E-Learning_from_Two_Different_Perspectives Raouna, K., & Raouna, K. (2024, J3). What is an LMS (Learning Management System)? LearnWorlds. Retrieved from https://www.learnworlds.com/lms-learning-management-system/ Riyadi. (2010). Learning Management System. Retrieved from https://repository.umy.ac.id: https://repository.umy.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/29984/BAB%20II.pdf?sequence=6 Ronald D. Freeze, K. A. (2010). IS Success Model in E-Learning Context Based on Students' Perceptions. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228365490_IS_Success_Model_in_E-Learning_Context_Based_on_Students%27_Perceptions Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J., Becker, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.03 Sumi, R. S. (2021). Satisfaction of E-Learners with Electronic Learning Service Quality Using the SERVQUAL Model. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853122001676 Widyapraba, E. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Niat Pengguna Untuk Menggunakan Aplikasi Daftar Online Rumah Sakit (Studi Kasus: Rsud Gambiran Kediri. Retrieved from https://repository.its.ac.id/: https://repository.its.ac.id/71951/ William Delone, E. M. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220079763_Information_Systems_Success_The_Quest_for_the_Dependent_Variable William Delone, E. M. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220591866_The_DeLone_and_McLean_Model_of_Information_Systems_Success_A_Ten-Year_Update




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v8i2.95795

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Hidayat Ramadhani Winarno

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

toto togel

andri dapat freespin saat lagi ngabuburit di mahjong ways 2

rp 6.500.000 dari spin terakhir samsul di mahjong ways

cerita damar ngopi di teras terus meledak di mahjong ways 2

scatter hitam bikin gilang kesenangan di kosan malam itu

rp 19.200.000 cuma dari satu freespin bikin haris kaget

pasca putus cinta firman nemu hoki di mahjong ways

rp 14.000.000 lewat scatter hitam faisal nggak nyangka

pengalaman unik hamid main mahjong ways pakai wifi warung

jefri penasaran coba mahjong ways 2 dan untung besar

cerita tomi dapat scatter pas sedang ngantuk berat

paul dapat rp 1.000.000 dari spin iseng di mahjong ways

rahasia kemenangan anton saat sedang santai di teras rumah

galang beli scatter sekali dan tembus rp 12.400.000

rendi ngabuburit di teras dan dapat keuntungan besar

detik detik kemenangan raka di mahjong ways 2

rp 9.800.000 dari mahjong ways saat main di terminal

dimas nonton bola sambil spin malah dapat freespin 4x di mahjong ways

roni berhasil tebak pola mahjong dan menang banyak

taufik lagi ngopi di warung malah dapat rp 10.600.000 di mahjong ways 2

zaky main mahjong ways di lapak pasar malam dan tembus jutaan

cerita nyata edi dapat freespin 3x di mahjong ways 2 malam hari

raka gak nyangka scatter mahjong muncul saat lagi beresin kamar

scatter hitam di mahjong ways bikin ramzi jadi senang seharian

pas lagi nyantai di angkringan andre malah dapat freespin

spin pertama mahjong ways 2 bikin yusuf bingung dan kaya

dapat rp 8.300.000 di mahjong ways saat rangga bosan di kantor

jam 2 subuh alwi cuma niat ngecek mahjong ways tapi malah cuan

spin mingguan anton di mahjong ways 2 bikin heboh satu warung

cerita yusuf menang mahjong ways 2 saat hujan deras

galih ternyata hoki di mahjong ways saat lagi di kos teman

anggoro ngebet main scatter hitam dan dapat rp 9.900.000

kenangan pertama irwan spin mahjong dapat rp 8.200.000

mahesa main mahjong ways pas ngantuk dan bikin heboh tetangga

cerita rasyid spin di pinggir danau kena freespin mahjong

berkah fajar di freespin pertama mahjong ways 2

rp 11.400.000 saat putra coba polanya sendiri di mahjong

langkah nekat jefri beli scatter mahjong ways 2 sekali dan menang

zidan nggak ngerti cara main mahjong tapi menang juga

pengalaman cuan besar aldi dari spin acak mahjong

momen hoki bima dari spin tak terduga mahjong ways

penjual mie sop di kampung cilacap mendadak beli motor baru berkat strategi mahjong ways koi800

buk rusmi borong barang elektronik dan buka warung baru setelah raih jackpot mahjong ways koi800

terungkap bocoran room mahjong koi800 yang bikin buk rusmi dapat jp puluhan juta dalam semalam

modal 20 ribu berbuah jackpot 72 juta buk rusmi beberkan trik dan pola mahjong koi800

ibu ibu kampung bongkar tips menang mahjong ways di koi800 usai beli motor dan kulkas baru

viral di grup facebook penjual mie sop raih jackpot mahjong koi800 dan buka usaha sambal rumahan

trik main mahjong ways versi buk rusmi jadi bahan perbincangan di tiktok setelah menang jutaan

kisah ibu rusmi dari kampung ke kios sendiri dengan rekomendasi room gacor mahjong koi800

rumus gacor mahjong ways koi800 berhasil bikin buk rusmi cairkan wd 68 juta dalam 2 hari

bocoran mahjong koi800 dari grup whatsapp bikin buk rusmi sukses buka warung baru di garasi

anak surabaya bongkar bocoran pola mahjong ways di gojek800 yang bikin orang tua bangga

trik rahasia anak lajang surabaya raih jackpot mahjong ways hingga ratusan juta di koi800

sukses di usia muda anak surabaya bagikan strategi mahjong ways paling ampuh di gojek800

rekomendasi pola dan rumus mahjong ways dari anak surabaya yang cairkan wd di koi800

pengakuan anak surabaya terkait trik dan bocoran jackpot mahjong ways di gojek800

strategi main mahjong ways yang dipakai anak surabaya di gojek800 bikin netizen terkejut

anak surabaya viral setelah temukan pola menang mahjong ways di koi800 ini buktinya

bocoran langka mahjong ways di gojek800 ditemukan anak surabaya ini penjelasannya

tips main mahjong ways ala anak surabaya berhasil bawa pulang cairan rp86 juta dari koi800

rumus rahasia mahjong ways dari anak surabaya bikin netizen pada ikutan main di gojek800

anak surabaya menjadi sorotan karena raih jackpot mahjong ways dengan trik koi800

strategi cuan anak surabaya main mahjong ways di gojek800 ini kata orang tua nya

pola jitu dari anak surabaya bikin mahjong ways di koi800 auto gacor dan cair

bocoran paling ditunggu anak surabaya raih jackpot di gojek800 pakai pola mahjong ways

tips dan strategi mahjong ways bikin anak surabaya dipuji warganet setelah cair di koi800

anak surabaya ungkap rekomendasi rumus mahjong ways yang bikin kemenangan di gojek800

trik rahasia diungkap anak surabaya setelah mahjong ways meledak di koi800

mahjong ways di gojek800 bikin anak surabaya cairkan wd dan bawa bangga ke orang tua

kisah anak surabaya raih jutaan dari mahjong ways pakai bocoran gojek800

rahasia kemenangan mahjong ways di koi800 versi anak surabaya ini tipsnya untuk pemula

buk rusmi ngaku menang puluhan juta dari mahjong koi800 berkat strategi pagi dan jeda spins

penjual mie sop pensiun dini setelah raih jackpot mahjong ways koi800 berkat pola ini

pola mahjong ways koi800 jadi viral usai buk rusmi menang jutaan dan borong alat masak

rekomendasi slot mahjong ways dari buk rusmi bikin warga kampung ikut berburu jackpot koi800

strategi main mahjong ways saat subuh bikin buk rusmi cairkan wd ratusan juta di koi800

kisah buk rusmi beli motor honda vario setelah raih jp di koi800 berkat tips mahjong gacor

warga miskin jadi punya tabungan usai rajin main mahjong ways dengan trik khusus di koi800

ibu rusmi dari kampung sentolo jadi trending karena menang mahjong ways koi800 lewat bocoran teman

setelah pakai rumus tembak ganda di mahjong ways buk rusmi raih jackpot dan beli lahan kosong

pengakuan buk rusmi soal pola auto spin dan jeda 10 detik di mahjong koi800 berbuah cairan jutaan

SLOT DANA

SLOT DANA

KASTATOTO

toto slot

situs toto

arista88

slot toto

situs slot gacor

mahjong

magnum188

Dewaslot88

laetoto

spaceman

agen toto play

slot

slot777

bonus new member 100

mahjong slot

Manjur55

spaceman

mdg188

pstoto99

visi4d

slot gacor

slot777

DPRBET

dollar4d

dewaslot88.eu.com

roda4d

mcmbola

hoki99

situs slot

roda4d

toto slot

situs slot gacor

dewahoki

tiga37

PSTOTO99

levis4d

batmantoto

erek erek

slot gacor

qqpulsa

mastogel

batmantoto

Situs Toto

slot gacor

slot88

https://nanostix.co.id/sp2/

lagi4d

https://malcolmhurst.com/

https://xinuosco.com/

https://reportertatu.com/

situs toto

kosmik 4d

bandar togel

situs togel

DUNIATOTO

indo911

situs toto

dewagaruda

coktogel

coktogel

miya4d

Toto Togel

erek erek

levis4d

javtogel

slot

https://micromaterialsresearch.com/

https://tvwesal.com/

toto slot

AMARTOTO

slot

paitogel

ceri123

slot

spaceman slot

Slot777

Situs Slot Gacor

miya4d

slot longhoki

MOM4D

omtogel

toto slot

paitogel

  

International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education

Print ISSN: 2597-7792
Online ISSN: 2549-8525
Website: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijpte/index
Email: ijpte@mail.uns.ac.id
Published by: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Ir. Sutami Street, No. 36A, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah Indonesia

toto togel

slot gacor

tokowin99

titan777

988slot

988bet