TEACHER’S ABILITIES OF TRANSLATION OF SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATION TO VISUAL REPRESENTATION AND VICE VERSA: ADDITION OF INTEGERS

Hapizah Hapizah, Ely Susanti, Puji Astuti

Abstract


Translation of representations is a process of changing representations from one into another one. In generally, mathematics representations consists of symbolical, visual (graphical), verbal, and tabular representations. This article discusses results of research about teacher’s understanding of mathematics representations and its implementation, which is teacher’s ability of translating from symbolical representation to graphical representation and vice versa. The sample of research were 91 mathematics teacher from some districts of South Sumatera and Bangka Belitung provinces. The data of research were collected by test related to addition of integers. The results show that teacher’s ability of translating from symbolical representation into graphical representation is very low which is only 48,4% of the sample could translate the representations correctly, meanwhile teacher’s ability of translating from graphical representation into symbolical representation is quite good which is 75,8% of the sample could translate the representations correctly. The mistakes identified when the mathematics teachers translated symbolic representation to visual representation are the result of addition not presented in numbers line, no the result of addition presented at all,  the order of numbers line not presented clearly, misdirection or no direction of numbers line, and no answers at all. Meanwhile the mistakes identified when the mathematics teachers translated visual representation to symbolic representation are no the result of addition presented, incorrectly order of numbers added, and no answers at all.


Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Bosse, M., Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Cheetham, M. (2011). Translations Among Mathematical Representation: Teacher Beliefs and Practices. East Carolina University

Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A Constructivist Alternative to the Representational View of Mind in Mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2.

Debrenti, E. (2015). Visual Representations in Mathematics Teaching: An Experiment with Students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Volume 8 Number 1

Durkaya, M., Özge, E., Fatih, Ö., Kaplan, A., Aksu, Z., Cihan, K. (2011). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ multiple representation competencies about determinant concept. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 2554–2558.

Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem Solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp.197-218). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Gulkilik, H. & Arikan, A. (2012). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ views about using multiple representations in mathematics instruction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 ( 2012 ) 1751 – 1756.

Hapizah. (2016). Modul Perkuliahan Belajar dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Tidak dipublikasikan

Janvier, C. (1987). Translation process in mathematics education. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in mathematics learning and problem solving (pp. 27-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kar, T., & Isik, A. (2011). Prospective mathematics teachers abilities’ to construct relations between the different representation of series with complex terms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol 15, pp 356 - 360.

Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein M. K. (1990). Functions, Graphs and Graphing: Tasks, Learning and Teaching. Review of Educational Research , 60(1), 37-42.

Liu., Z. (2012). Survey of Primary Students’ Mathematical Representation Statis and Study on the Teaching Model of Mathematical Representation. Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 5. No. 1 pp 63-76.

Monoyiou, A., Papageorgiou, P., & Gagatsis, A. (2007). Students’ and teachers’ representations in problem solving. Working Group 1: The role of images and metaphors in the learning and understanding mathematics. CERME 5, 2007, 141-150.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Pinar, A. (2014). The Examination of Representation used by Classroom Teacher Candidates in Solving Mathematical Problems. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (16) pp 2349 - 2365.

Smith, S. P. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: Children’s representations of problems. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 263-274). Reston, NJ: NCTM.

Zhonghe, W. (2004). The Study of Middle Scholl Teachers’ Understanding and Use of Mathematical Representation in Relation to Teachers’ Zone of Proximal Development in Teaching Fractions and Algebraic Functions.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v3i1.19268

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Hapizah Hapizah, Ely Susanti, Puji Astuti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


  

International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education

Print ISSN: 2597-7792
Online ISSN: 2549-8525
Website: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijpte/index
Email: ijpte@mail.uns.ac.id
Published by: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Ir. Sutami Street, No. 36A, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah Indonesia