ANALYSIS OF FINAL SEMESTER ASSESSMENT (PAS) QUESTIONS FOR CLASS XI CHEMISTRY SUBJECTS AT SMA NEGERI 1 WONOGIRI FOR THE 2022/2023 ACADEMIC YEAR

Clara Ria Dentawati, Endang Susilowati, Sulistyo Saputro

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the quality of the Final Semester Assessment questions for the chemistry subject of SMA Negeri 1 Wonogiri using Iteman 4.5 regarding the validity, reliability, discriminatory power, difficulty level, and deceivers' effectiveness. This study used a quantitative descriptive research method. Samples are in the form of student answers. Data was obtained using documentation techniques in 1 set of questions, answer keys, and student answer responses of as many as 108. Data analysis techniques using the Iteman program version 4.5. The analysis results showed that in the aspect of validity, 76.67% of the questions were valid, and 33.34% were invalid. In the reliability aspect, an alpha reliability value of 0.82 was obtained and was in the high category. Regarding difficulty, 33.34% of the questions were obtained in the difficult category, and 66.66% of the questions were in the medium category. Regarding discriminatory power, 7% of the questions were terrible, 20% were deficient, 40% were in the medium category, and 33% were in the excellent category. In the aspect of deceptive effectiveness, 7% of the questions were categorized as sufficient, 30% of the questions were classified as good, and 63% of the questions were classified as very good

Keywords

Question Item Analysis, End-Of-Semester Assessment, Iteman

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] Perwira Negara, H. R., & Kurniawati, K. R. A. (2018). Karakteristik Butir Soal Try Out Ujian Nasional SMA Mata Pelajaran Matematika Se-Kota Mataram dengan Menggunakan Program Iteman. Jurnal VARIAN, 1(2), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.30812/varian.v1i2. 67

[2] Pristiwanti, D., Badariah, B., Hidayat, S., & Dewi, R. S. (2022). Pengertian Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 1707–1715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.310 04/jpdk.v4i6.9498

[3] Arifin, Z. (2015). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Penulis. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama RI.

[4] Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Soal Kemampuan Membedakan Rangkaian Seri dan Paralel Melalui Teori Tes Klasik dan Model Rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJERR/article/view/24080/pdf

[5] Santosa, S., & Badawi, J. A. (2022). Analisis Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Tema Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Makhluk Hidup Kelas III Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 1678–1686. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v 6i2.2206

[6] Prabowo, A., Sunaryo, S., & Rahmawati, U. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Analisis Butir Soal dengan Menggunakan Item and Test Analysis. AdMathEdu : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Ilmu Matematika dan Matematika Terapan, 7(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedu .v7i2.9146

[7] Nayla Amalia, A., & Widayati, A. (2012). Analisis Butir Soal Tes Kendali Mutu Kelas XII SMA Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, X(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2 1831/jpai.v10i1.919

[8] Hadiana, D. (2015). Penilaian Hasil Belajar untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v21i1. 173

[9] Subali, B. (2014). Analisis Soal Baik Kualitatif Maupun Kuantitatif. Workshop Item Development Dosen Poltekes Kebidanan Politeknik Kesehatan Surakarta, 5, 1–36.

[10] Fatimah, L. U., & Alfath, K. (2019). Analisis Kesukaran Soal, Daya Pembeda dan Fungsi Distraktor. AlManar, 8(2), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.36668/jal.v8i2.115

[11] Nazar, M. S. S. W. R. F. et al. (2010). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Konsep Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Biologi Edukasi, 2(3), 49–53.

[12] Jihad, Asep dan Haris, Abdul. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo

[13] Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. In Cimahi Penerbit Trim Komunikata.

[14] Daryanto. (2012). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

[15] Perdana, S. A. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Pengukuran Pemahaman Konsep Persamaan Kuadrat Melalui Teori Tes Klasik dan Rasch Model. Jurnal Kiprah, 6(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v6i1. 574

[16] Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.

[17] Cohen−Swerdlik. (2009). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement 7th Edition. McGraw-Hill.

[18] Sudijono, A. (2015). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, cet. Ke-14. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

[19] Guilford, J.P. (1956). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and Education 3rd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company

[20] Triono, D., Sarno, R., & Sungkono, K. R. (2020). Item Analysis for Examination Test in The Postgraduate Student’s Selection with Classical Test Theory and Rasch Measurement Model. Proceedings - 2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: IT Challenges for Sustainability, Scalability, and Security in the Age of Digital Disruption, ISemantic 2020, 523– 529. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50 169.2020.9234204

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jpkim.v12i1.80120

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.