ASSESSMENT OF TEST INSTRUMENTS FOR CHEMISTRY SUBJECTS REACTION RATE MATERIALS USING ANATES AND RASCH MODELS

Ria Ninda Prabaningrum, Budi Utami, Suryadi Budi Utomo

Abstract

This study aims to Determine the quality of questions using Anates Version 4.0.9. and the Rasch model. This study used qualitative and quantitative analysis research methods using the Anates program version 4.0.9 and the Rasch model. Based on the study's results, it can be concluded that: Analysis of the quality of instruments with the Anates program showed high reliability (alpha coefficient 0.72) with 13 valid items. The discriminating power varies with 16 good questions, two good enough, and two bad. Based on the Rasch model, as many as 17 valid items have good reliability and an alpha coefficient of 0.71, as well as good discriminatory power. The results of the Anates and Rasch Model are that neither proportion of difficulty levels has been in accordance with the rules of making questions, and neither deceiver has worked.

Keywords

Question Point Analysis, Anates, Rasch Model

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1]. Mardapi, D. 2012, Pengukuran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

[2]. Marjiastuti, K., & Wahyuni, S. 2014, Analisis Kemampuan Peserta Didik Dengan Model Racsh. Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pendidikan Tahun 2014, (2004), 94–102.

[3]. Widyoko, E. P. 2014, Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran : Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

[4]. Purwanto, N. 2011, Prinsip-prinsip Dan Tekhnik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

[5]. Daryanto. 2008, Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Pt. Rineka Cipta.

[6]. Balitbang Depdiknas. 2007, Model Pengembangan Silabus Mata Pelajaran Dan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu. Jakarta.

[7]. Sudijono, A. 2015, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

[8]. Hayati, S., & Lailatussaadah. 2016, Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Pengetahuan Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif Dan Menyenangkan (Pakem) Menggunakan Model Rasch. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 16(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v16i2.5 93

[9]. Wahyuningsih, T. E. 2015, Analisis Butir Soal tes Objektif Buatan Guru Ulangan Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Mlati Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014 (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta). Diambil dari https://eprints.uny.ac.id/26627/

[10] Arikunto, S. 2009, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

[11] Sudjana, N. 2012, Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

[12]. Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. 2015, Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunika.

[13]. Arif, M. 2015, Penerapan Aplikasi Anates Bentuk Soal Pilihan Ganda. Edutic - Scientific Journal of Informatics Education, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21107/edutic.v1i 1.3 98

[14]. Ratnaningsih, D. J. 2013, Analisis Butir Tes Objektif Ujian Akhir Semester Mahasiswa Universitas Terbuka Berdasarkan Teori Tes Modern. (1).

[15]. Anggreini, D., & Darmawan, C. A. 2016, Analisis Kualitas Soal Try Out Ujian Nasional Dengan Menggunakan Aplikasi Program Anates. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 2(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v2i1. 21 3

[16]. Umronah. 2018, Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi Kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 1 Imogiri Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 7(1), 1–17.

[17]. Arifin, Z. 2010, Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik dan dan Prosedur. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

[18]. Farida, I. 2017, Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum Nasional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jpkim.v12i2.66586

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.