基于《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》IBDP中文B普通课程汉字表编制研究

Ni Hui Chun

Abstract

This study arises from the absence of a standardized Chinese character list for the IBDP Chinese B Standard Level course (hereafter “Standard Level”). Using examination papers between 2007 to 2013 as the source, a total of 2,129 Chinese characters were extracted and compared with the character list in the Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education (hereafter “the Standards”). Based on this comparison, the study explores the compilation of a Standard Level character list applicable to teaching practice. The findings reveal that 94% of the characters in the Standard Level examination materials overlap with those in the Standards, demonstrating a high coverage of the Standards’ character list for teaching and assessment in international curricula. The study also identifies distinct characteristics in the characters unique to the Standard Level and those unique to the Standards. As such, this paper proposes principles and procedures for constructing a categorized and graded character list consisting of three tiers: core characters, secondary core characters, and reference characters. The core character list is based on the shared characters; the secondary core list includes characters unique to the Standard Level as well as those unique to Levels 1–4 of the Standards; and the reference character list comprises characters unique to Levels 5–6 of the Standards. The resulting Standard Level character list aligns the course objectives with the Standards, addressing the gap in adapting the Standards to international curricula.

Keywords

Chinese Proficiency; Character List; Chinese Language; Grading Standards; IBDP Chinese

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] Horwitz, E. K., & Oxford, R. (1991). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. The Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.2307/329849

[2] Shen, H. H. (2005). An investigation of Chinese-character learning strategies among non-native speakers of Chinese. System, 33(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.11.001

[3] Sung, K.-Y. (2012). A study on Chinese-character learning strategies and character learning performance among American learners of Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 1(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2012-0012

[4] Sung, K.-Y., & Wu, H.-P. (2011). Factors influencing the learning of Chinese characters. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,14(6),683–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.571658

[5] Xu, X., & Padilla, A. M. (2013). Using meaningful interpretation and chunking to enhance memory: The case of chinese character learning. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12039

[6] Xu, Z., Wang, L.-C., Liu, D., Chen, Y., & Tao, L. (2020). The moderation effect of processing efficiency on the relationship between visual working memory and Chinese character recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01899

[7] 丁安琪,张杨,兰韵诗(2023) .基于《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》的中文文本难度自动分级研究——以HSK中高级阅读文本为例,《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版) 》,(06):81-92.

[8] 国际文凭组织IB.大学预科项目语言B指南2020年首次评估. (2018) .日内瓦:国际文凭组织.

[9] 江新. (2006).汉字频率和构词数对非汉字圈学生汉字学习的影响, 《心理学报》, (04):489-496.

[10] 李亚男. (2021). 《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》解读. 《国际汉语教学研究》, (01): 24-26

[11] 刘弘,金明珠. (2018).IBDP中文B考试阅读文本的多角度考察.《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版) 》, 16(02):82-92.

[12] 刘弘,苏越. (2021).IBDP中文B课程阅读理解试题命题特点考察. 《国际汉语教学研究》,(02):20-30.

[13] 刘英林,马箭飞,赵国成.国际中文教育中文水平等级标准(国家标准·应用解读本·第一分册:等级描述、音节、汉字).北京:北京语言大学出版社,2021:III.

[14] 刘英林,李佩泽,李亚男. (2020).汉语国际教育汉语水平等级标准全球化之路.世界汉语教学, 34(02):147-157.

[15] 王默涵. (2023).IBDP新大纲指导下的中文B教学研究.华东师范大学.

[16] 吴勇毅,王喜. (2024).从《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》看全球中文教育字词等级分布——以中国、马来西亚、新加坡和欧洲为例. 《华文教学与研究》, (02):30-39.

[17] 余佳蔓,叶军,沈佳晨.(2024).比较视域下《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》的教学应用研究.《新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》, 45(03):117-124.

[18] 中华人民共和国教育部,国家语言文字工作委员会.国际中文教育中文水平等级标准(GF 0025—2021).(2021).北京:北京语言大学出版社.

[19] 周祖谟. (1989). 汉字的特性和作用.语文学习,(03):16-17.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.