Application of Culturally Responsive Teaching Through the Piil Pesenggiri Philosophy to Enhance Learning Outcomes and Cultural Interest in PKn for Fourth Grade of Elementary Students

Muadz Assidiqi, Sutarmi Sutarmi

Abstract

By implementing culturally responsive teaching practices, the research aims to improve learning outcomes and foster cultural interest among fourth-grade elementary students in PKn. The problem in this study is the students' lack of cultural understanding, which leads to their ignorance of the cultural values present in their surroundings, particularly Piil Pesenggiri. This study employed the class action research method in one of the elementary schools in Lampung. The phases of this research consist of five stages, as follows: action planning, action implementation, observation, reflection, and evaluation. Research instruments consist of interview questions, issues, and cultural interest-raising. This research employed an interactive analysis approach. The pre-cycle results revealed a low level of student cultural interest, with a 70% achievement percentage, a 75% teacher learning activity, and an average percentage of 72.5%. Furthermore, Cycle I results were 78.84% for teacher activity and 75% for student activity, with a total Cycle I percentage of 76.92%. The teacher activity results were 94.23%, the student activity was 91.66%, and the total percentage in Cycle II was 92.95%. Furthermore, the breakdown of student learning outcomes by cycle is as follows: 12.50% had an average of 52.38 for pre-cycles, 59.09% had an average of 62.27 for cycles I, and 90.90% had an average of 81.13 in cycles II. Based on these findings, we can conclude that incorporating Piil Pesenggiri's philosophical values into culturally responsive teaching can help students learn more about their own and other cultures and become more interested in PKn. It is hoped that the findings of this research can contribute to knowledge related to culturally responsive learning about the spirit of nationalism and fostering inter-ethnic tolerance as a basis for further research, such as R&D

Keywords

lack of cultural understanding, culturally responsive teaching, piil pesenggiri, learning outcomes, cultural interest, PKn

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adams, R., & Farnsworth, M. (2020). Culturally Responsive Teacher Education for Rural and Native Communities. Multicultural Perspectives, 22(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2020.1741367

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Assidiqi, M., Sariyatun, Purwanta, H. S., & Ramadhani, H. N. F. (2023). Reconstruction the philosophy of Pill Pesenggiri on lampung people in multicultural society with life skills education to improve literacy skills. In In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2621, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142674

Blazar, D. (2021). Teachers of Color, Culturally Responsive Teaching, and Student Outcomes: Experimental Evidence from the Random Assignment of Teachers to Classes. EdWorkingPaper, (21), 1–58. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.26300/jym0-wz02

Budiyono. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Bujuri, D. A., Baiti, M., Handayani, T., Saputra, A. D., Shawmi, A. N., Abron, F., … Fidian Abron. (2023). Environmental-based character education: Implementation of Lampung society life philosophy values (Piil Pesenggiri) in elementary school. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 243–254. Diambil dari https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJEE/article/view/59250

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4nd ed). Boston: Pearson Education.

Cruz, R. A., Manchanda, S., & Rodl, J. E. (2020). An examination of teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419875194

Jacobsen, D. A., Eggen, Paul, Kauchak, & Donald. (2009). Methods For Teaching. Yogyakarta: Pustaka.

Kemmis, S., & Taggart, R. M. (1988). The Action Researcher Planner. Victoria: Deakin University.

Maulani, Umasih, & Rochalina, C. I. (2022). Internalization of the Character of Nationalism through Learning in Schools: Implementation and Challenges. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i1.38300

Muñiz, J. (2019). Culturally Responsive Teaching: A 50-State Survey of Teaching Standards. New America, (March), 2–51. Diambil dari https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED594599

Noor, A. F., & Sugito. (2019). Multicultural Education Based in the Local Wisdom of Indonesia for Elementary Schools in the 21st Century. Journal of International Social Studies, (9), 94–106. Diambil dari http://www.iajiss.org

Portes, P. R., González Canché, M., Boada, D., & Whatley, M. E. (2018). Early Evaluation Findings From the Instructional Conversation Study: Culturally Responsive Teaching Outcomes for Diverse Learners in Elementary School. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 488–531. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217741089

Rachman, M. (2015). Pendekatan Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Mixed, PTK, R&D. Yogyakarta: Magnum Pustaka Utama.

Sanjaya, W. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses. Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Stavenhagen, R. (1986). Problems and Prospects of Multiethnic States. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

Subini, N. (2012). Psikologi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Mentari Pustaka.

Tilaar, H. A. . (2004). Multikulturalisme Tantangan Global Masa Depan Transformasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Yamin, M. (2013). Strategi dan Metode dalam Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Refrensi (GP Press Group).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v27i2.84489

Refbacks