Multiple Representation-Based Blended Learning Model for Chemistry Learning in High School

Sri Mulyani, Elvi Susanti VH, Sri Retno Dwi Ariani, Suryadi Budi Utomo, Rachma Kharolinasari, Maria Yuliana Panie


Online distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak presents new challenges and opportunities for teachers and students. The Blended Learning method is reported to be one of the promising alternatives. However, no specific study revealed the proper blended learning model for chemistry learning that require chemistry representation and can improve critical thinking and problem solving skills at high school level. Qualitative research using phenomenological methods was used in this study. The data collection technique used is using questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. A total of 22 respondents from master students of chemistry education, lecturers and teachers of chemistry education participated in this study. The blended learning model analyzed in this study are Rotational blended learning models (station class, Lab/Whole Group class, flipped class, and Individual), Flex, Self-Blend, and Enriched-Virtual classes. The study results indicate that the blended learning model that the respondents chose the most suitable for multiple representation-based chemistry learning was the Flipped Class model (50%), while the one that was not selected was the Individual Rotation model.


blended learning; multiple representatif; chemistry learning

Full Text:



Ainsworth, S. (2008). The Educational Value of Multiple-representations when Learning Complex Scientific Concepts. In J. K. Gilbert, & e. al, Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education (pp. 191-208).

Alase, Abayomi. 2017. The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Reseach Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, Vol. 5 No. 2, April 2017. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9

Andrini, V. S., Pratama, H., & Maduretno, T. W. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom and project based learning model on student’s critical thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171(1).

Arham, U. U., & Dwiningsih, K. (2016). Kelayakan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Blended Learning pada Materi Pokok Kimia Unsur. UNESA Journal of Chemistry Education, 5(2), 345–352.

Cahyono, B. (2015). Korelasi Pemecahan Masalah dan Indikator Berpikir Kritis. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, Vol.5, No.1, 15-24. doi:

Care, E., Griffin, P., & Wilson, M. (2018). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (eds.)). Springe.

Casadonte, D. (2016). The Effectiveness of Course Flipping in General Chemistry -Does It Work? ACS Symposium Series, 1228, 19–37.

Cresswell, John W. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

DeRuisseau, L. R. (2016). The flipped classroom allows for more class time devoted to critical thinking. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(4), 522–528.

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16.

Fautch, J. M. (2015). The flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: Is it effective? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 179–186.

Harrell, K. B., & Wendt, J. L. (2019). The Impact of Blended Learning on Community of Inquiry and Perceived Learning among High School Learners Enrolled in a Public Charter School. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–14.

Johnston, A. H. (1982). Macro and Micro chemistry. School Sci. Rev., 64, 377-379

Jönsson, B. A. (2005). A case study of successful e-learning: A web-based distance course in medical physics held for school teachers of the upper secondary level. Medical Engineering and Physics, 27(7), 571–581.

Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers and Education, 78, 160–173.

Lalima, & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach 1, 129-136.

Muzyka, J. L. (2015). ConfChem Conference on Flipped Classroom: Just-in-Time Teaching in Chemistry Courses with Moodle. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1580–1581.

Prasetyo, Z. K. (2011). Pengembangan Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP) Berbasis Lima Domain Sains untuk Menanamkan Karakter Siswa SMP. Prosiding, 367- 368.

Rossi, R. D. (2015). ConfChem Conference on Flipped Classroom: Improving Student Engagement in Organic Chemistry Using the Inverted Classroom Model. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1577–1579.

Srinivasan, S., Gibbons, R. E., Murphy, K. L., & Raker, J. (2018). Flipped classroom use in chemistry education: Results from a survey of postsecondary faculty members. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1307–1318.

Staker, H., & Horn, M.B. (2012). Classing K-12 Blended learning. Innosight Institute Retrieved from ERIC.

Tasker, R., & Dalton, R. (2006). Research into Practice: Visualisation of the Molecular World Using Animations, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol. 7, No. 2, Hal.141-159.

Urbani, J. J. M., Truesdell, E., Urbani, J. J. M., Roshandel, S., Michaels, R., Truesdell, E., Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., Gray, D. L. L., Demirel, M., Fadel, C., Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, C., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., Martin, C., Povee, K., … Truesdell, E. (2017). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educacion Quimica, 1(1), 1709–1716.

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–14.

Wardani, D.N., Toenlioe, A.J., & Wedi, A. (2018). Daya Tarik Pembelajaran di Era 21 dengan Blended Learning. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(1), 13–18

Wardani, D.N., Toenlioe, A.J., & Wedi, A. (2018). Daya Tarik Pembelajaran di Era 21 dengan Blended Learning. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(1), 13–18.


  • There are currently no refbacks.