Mind Map Students in Straight-Line Equations: Mistakes, Strenghts, and Weaknesses
Abstract
The study aims to find out the student's response about Mind Map, a student's fault in creating the Mind Map, the strengths and weaknesses of using Mind Mapping techniques in the learning of straight-line equations. Quantitative descriptive analysis of percentages was conducted against 84 responses to students about Mind Map, and evalua¬tive analysis was conducted against the Mind Map document by students of Grade VIII SMP Negeri 1 Masaran. Mistakes students include: coloring has not been made correctly, wrong in putting the next branch, making many branches of the main branch but not forwarded, the center of the Mind Map at the edges, wrong in dashing main idea with the idea Next branch, and did not write the idea on the next branch. The strenghts of using Mind Mappng techniques include: Students can make comparisons, learning time can be used more effectively, learning can be done continuously, provid¬ing a place to pour the next ideas, Students' creativity can be developed well, students become more actively asked, and students can make corrections to the truth of their answers. The weaknesses include: Mind Map function for benchmarking yet effective can be used, contrast difference cannot be found, and students' difficulty determines the main idea and the ideas of the branch.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
As’ari, A. R., Tohir, M., Valentino, E., Imron, Z.& Taufiq, I. (2017). Matematika SMP/MTs Kelas VIII Semester 1. Jakarta: Kemdikbud. Google Schoolar
Buzan, T. (2012). Buku Pintar Mind Map. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Google Schoolar
Buzan, T. (2009). Mind Mapping: Scientific Research and Studies. Think Buzan Ltd.
Dewi, A. C., Budiyono & Riyadi (2017). Slope and Equation of Line: Teach and Analysis in Terms of Emotional Intelligence. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE) IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: 895 (2017) 012035 . crossref
Grech, G. (2016). Marketing mind maps in higher education. Symposia Melitensia Num-ber 12 (2016). Google Schoolar
Huda, M., (2015). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Google Schoolar
Kotob, F., Styger, L. & Richardson L. P., (2016). Exploring mind mapping techniques to analyse complex case study data. University of Wollongong Australia. Google Schoolar
PAMER UN. (2016). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional SMP/MTs. Jakarta: PUSPENDIK. Google Schoolar
Parikh, N. D. (2016). Effectiveness of Teaching through Mind Mapping Technique. The International Journal of Indian Psychology.3 (3), 148-156.
Rosciano, A. (2015). The Effectiveness of Mind Mapping as an Active Learning Strategy among Assosiate Degree Nursing Students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 10 (2), 93 – 99. link
Sumarsih. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan siswa SMP Negeri 1 Masaran dalam mempelajari persamaan Garis Lurus dan Alternatif Pemecahannya. Surakarta: SNPMath UNS. Google Schoolar
Tampomas, H. (2006). Matematika Plus 2A SMP Kelas VIII Semester 1. Jakarta: Yudhistira. Hal 100.
Vitulli, P. & Giles, R. (2016). Mind Mapping: Making Connections with Images and Color. Delta Journal of Education. 6 (2), 1 - 10.
Wilson, K., Solaz, E. D., & Dixon, N. G. (2016). A Preliminary Study on the use of Mind Mapping as a Visual Learning Strategy in General Education Science classes for Arabic speakers in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of the Scholarship of Teach¬ing and Learning, 16 (1), 31-52. crossref
Yilmaz, G., & Kacar, A. (2016). On the Teaching Polygons to Primary School 7 th Grade Students Using Vee Diagrams and Mind Maps. Bagkent University Journal of Educa¬tion ISSN 2148-3272. 3 (1), 13-24. link
Zivkovic, S. (2016). A Model of Critical Thinking as an Important Attribute for Success in the 21st Century. Turkey: Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences.14 – 17. link
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.