Exploring Learning Needs for Developing a STEAM-Oriented Differentiated Virtual Laboratory in Electroplating and Electropolishing
Abstract
This study aims to explore the need for virtual laboratory media (V-Lab) that integrates differentiated learning using the STEAM approach for electroplating and electropolishing. The research method used is qualitative-descriptive, with the research subjects comprising 3 teachers and 75 students from two public senior high schools and one vocational high school in Metro City, Lampung. Data collection used questionnaires, learning observations, and interviews. The results of the observations show that chemistry learning is still dominated by lectures and exercises (40%), while limited equipment, materials, and costs, as well as the risk of hazardous waste, continue to limit practical activities. Students experience significant difficulties in visualizing sub-microscopic phenomena, especially in determining ion flow (74%) and reactions at the anode-cathode (62%), resulting in a low ability to calculate Faraday's Law (60%). Cognitive data analysis shows a diversity of student abilities, with the majority being at the "need guidance" level (41%). These findings underscore the need for innovative learning media, with 100% of teachers and 77% of students agreeing with the development of V-Lab integrated with differentiated learning and the STEAM approach. V-Labs are expected to transform abstract concepts into concrete ones, increase motivation, and accelerate the learning pace of diverse students without the physical risks of a laboratory setting.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, N., & Ullah, S. (2020). Review to Analyze and Compare Virtual Chemistry Laboratories for Their Use in Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3563–3574. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00185
Brett, C. M. A., & Oliveira-Brett, A. M. (2020). Future tasks of electrochemical research. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 24(9), 2051–2052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-020-04696-x
Budiyono, A., Husna, H., & Wildani, A. (2020). The Effect of Applying an Integrated Steam PBL Model on Creative Thinking Skills as Seen From Students' Concept Understanding. EDUSAINS,12(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i2.13248
Campos-Quiroz, M. M., García-Rascón, A., & Frías-Gutierréz, E. (2024). Integration of electrolytic module into didactic prototype for application of chrome coating. Journal of Technological Prototypes, 10(25), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.35429/jtp.2024.10.25.5.7
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. SAGE Publication.
de Jong, O., & Treagust, D. (2002). The Teaching and Learning of Electrochemistry.
Dickmann, T., Opfermann, M., Dammann, E., Lang, M., & Rumann, S. (2019). What you see is what you learn? The role of visual model comprehension for academic success in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00016j
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education (J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust, Eds.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
Kelly, R., & Akaygun, S. (2019). Visualizations and representations in chemistry education. In Chemistry Education Research and Practice (Vol. 20, Issue 4, pp. 657–658). Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp90009h
Kempler, P. A., Boettcher, S. W., & Ardo, S. (2021). Reinvigorating electrochemistry education. IScience, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102481
Lestari, D. P., Supahar, Paidi, Suwarjo, & Herianto. (2023). Effect of science virtual laboratory combination with demonstration methods on lower-secondary school students’ scientific literacy ability in a science course. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16153–16175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11857-8
L.G, Y., & Fathurrahman. (2020). Carbon steel coating tools using the hard chrome electroplating method for student practice. BASA (Science Barometer) Science Learning Innovation, 1(2), 8–15.
Lin, C. Y., & Wu, H. K. (2021). Effects of different ways of using visualizations on high school students’ electrochemistry conceptual understanding and motivation towards chemistry learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 786–801. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00308e
Loh, A. S. L., Subramaniam, R., & Tan, K. C. D. (2014). Exploring students’ understanding of electrochemical cells using an enhanced two-tier diagnostic instrument. Research in Science and Technological Education, 32(3), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.916669
Nakiboglu, C., Rahayu, S., Nakiboğlu, N., & Treagust, D. F. (2023). Exploring senior high-school students’ understanding of electrochemical concepts: patterns of thinking across Turkish and Indonesian contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00124e
Orozco, M., Boon, M., & Susarrey Arce, A. (2023). Learning electrochemistry through scientific inquiry. Conceptual modeling as a learning objective and as a scaffold. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2047894
Purba, M., Purnamasari, N., Soetantyo, S., Suwarna, I. R., & Susanti, E. I. (2021). Principles of Differentiated Instruction Development (Differentiated Instruction) Academic Papers, Eds.; 1st ed.). Center for Curriculum and Learning, Agency for Standards, Curriculum, and Educational Assessment, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, Republic of Indonesia.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Baker, A. (2019). Moving Toward Transdisciplinary Instruction: A Longitudinal Examination of STEAM Teaching Practices. In STEAM Education: Theory and Practice (pp. 146–167). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_8
Rahayu, S., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2022). High School and Preservice Chemistry Teacher Education Students’ Understanding of Voltaic and Electrolytic Cell Concepts: Evidence of Consistent Learning Difficulties Across Years. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(8), 1859–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10226-6
Ridwan, A., Rahmawati, Y., & Hadinugrahaningsih, T. (2017). Steam Integration in Chemistry Learning for Developing 21st Century Skills. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, 7(2), 184–194.
Said, S. R., Wibowo, H., & Jatmiko, R. D. (2014). Metal Coating Tools Electropating Results of Research for Vocational School Students. Inotek, 18(1), 66–79.
Schmidt, H. J., Marohn, A., & Harrison, A. G. (2007). Factors that prevent learning in electrochemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20118
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–20. http://www.tused.org
Suriyana, S., & Novianti, M. (2021). Efektifitas Pembelajaran Berbasis STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematic) terhadap Hasil Belajar pada Meteri Dimensi Tiga SMK. EDUKATIF: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 3(6), 4049–4056. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1199
Sutarno, Widyanto, B., Syuryana, E. P., Wahyudi, S., Bayan, F. S. N., Rachma, C. B., Pratama, G. V., Riskamti, & Muwaffaq, A. A. (2022). Optimization of the Effect of Electropolishing’s Current Density and Time on Roughness, Microstructure and Corrosion Resistance. Journal of Energy, Mechanical, Material, and Manufacturing Engineering, 6(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.22219/jemmme.v6i3.19828
Thayban, T., Kurniawati, E., Munandar, H., Dia, V., & Sangkota, A. (2024). Strengthening the Concept of Electrolysis through Interactive Practicum in Class XII A at SMAN I Suwawa. 29–56. https://doi.org/10.62951/komunitas.v2i4.121
Tihar Ali, M., Reda Woldu, A., & Geremew Yohannes, A. (2022). High School Students’ Learning Difficulties In Electrochemistry: A Mini-Review. African Journal of Chemical Education-AJCE, 2022(2), 12.
Tsaparlis, G. (2000). Chemical education in Europe: Curricula and policies The States-ff-Matter Approach (Soma) to Introductory Chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research And Practice In Europe, 1(1), 161–168.
Turner, K. L., He, S., Marchegiani, B., Read, S., Blackburn, J., Miah, N., & Leketas, M. (2024). Around the world in electrochemistry: a review of the electrochemistry curriculum in high schools. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 28(3–4), 1361–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05548-0
Utomo, W., Suryono, W., Jimmi, J., Santosa, T. A., & Agustina, I. (2023). Effect of STEAM-Based Hybrid Learning Model on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Science Education Research, 9(9), 742–750. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5147
Widodo A, Heri W, Arianto LS, Didik N, Fredy S, Mujiyono, Novi H, & Agung W. (2021). Performance of Electroplating Equipment for Practice in Vocational Schools. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vocational Dynamics, 6(2), 105–111. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/dynamika/issue/view/2164
Yang, G., Wang, B., Tawfiq, K., Wei, H., Zhou, S., & Chen, G. (2017). Electropolishing of surfaces: theory and applications. Surface Engineering, 33(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2016.1198452
Yesha, E., Shitaw, D., Endaye, M., & Aderaw, K. (2025). The Impact of Virtual Laboratory Integration on Electrochemistry Education at Enessie Secondary School, Hulet Eju Enessie District, East Gojjam, Ethiopia. African Journal of Chemical Education-AJCE, 15(1), 15.
Zaki, S., Zhang, N., & Gilchrist, M. D. (2022). Electropolishing and Shaping of Micro-Scale Metallic Features. Micromachines, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13030468
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.






