The Impact of Experimental Research-Based Learning Modules on Students' Affective Domain: A Study on Religious Moderation in Chemistry Education

Adean Mayasri, Muhammad Reza, M. Rizki Asyifa, Kania Ulayya

Abstract

Islamic Religious Colleges (PTKI) 's key mission is to promote religious moderation for students. This aspect is currently missing in the Chemical Education Studies Program curriculum. To address this, we constructed a teaching module that applied the 4S-TMD method (Selection, structuring, characterization, and didactical reduction). This work is based on experimental data of using waste palm coconut shells as activated carbon for methylene blue dye adsorption, which formed two modules: Inorganic Chemistry II (Module A) and Instrumental Analysis Chemistry (Module B). The selection phase was designed with graduate learning outcomes (GLO), learning content, and indicators of religious moderation in module design. The item content validity index (I-CVI), measuring content validity, reached an excellent average of 0.98. During the structuring phase, laboratory experimental results were mapped conceptually. Module A performed excellently, with a validity of 85%, whereas Module B was below 80%. After the refinement steps, both modules reached 100% validity. The measure of the value of religious moderation of GLO indicates >60% for 10 variables, whereas the self-assessment of the nine values of religious moderation of students shows very good (above 20%). This is the first study applying religious moderation to chemistry education and showed that the 4S-TMD method of implementing the 4S-TS method was effective (4.9/5.0 for eligibility). Sow enjoyably integrates chemistry and science education with similar values, which can take place using their type.

Keywords

Religious Moderation; 4S-TMD; Activated Carbon

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] BPS, “Jumlah Produksi Tanaman Perkebunan di Provinsi Aceh,” Jakarta, 2021.

[2] A. Haryanti, N. Norsamsi, P. S. F. Sholiha, and N. P. Putri, “Studi pemanfaatan limbah padat kelapa sawit,” Konversi, pp. 20–29, 2014, doi: 10.20527/k.v3i2.161.

[3] F. M. Kuswa, H. P. Putra, Prabowo, A. Darmawan, M. Aziz, and H. Hariana, “Investigation of the combustion and ash deposition characteristics of oil palm waste biomasses,” Biomass Convers Biorefin, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 24375–24395, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13399-023-04418-z.

[4] B. Koul, M. Yakoob, and M. P. Shah, “Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability,” Environ Res, vol. 206, p. 112285, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112285.

[5] H. B. Atinkut, T. Yan, Y. Arega, and M. H. Raza, “Farmers’ willingness-to-pay for eco-friendly agricultural waste management in Ethiopia: A contingent valuation,” J Clean Prod, vol. 261, p. 121211, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121211.

[6] O. Hijazi, S. Munro, B. Zerhusen, and M. Effenberger, “Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 54, pp. 1291–1300, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.013.

[7] M. R. Zakaria, M. A. A. Farid, Y. Andou, I. Ramli, and M. A. Hassan, “Production of biochar and activated carbon from oil palm biomass: current status, prospects, and challenges,” Ind Crops Prod, vol. 199, p. 116767, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116767.

[8] G. Sethia and A. Sayari, “Activated carbon with optimum pore size distribution for hydrogen storage,” Carbon N Y, vol. 99, pp. 289–294, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.030.

[9] K. Huang, F. Liu, J. P. Fan, and S. Dai, “Open and hierarchical carbon framework with ultralarge pore volume for efficient capture of carbon dioxide.,” ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 43, pp. 36961–36968, 2018, doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b12182.

[10] K. Jasri, A. S. Abdulhameed, A. H. Jawad, Z. A. ALOthman, T. A. Yousef, and O. K. Al Duaij, “Mesoporous activated carbon produced from mixed wastes of oil palm frond and palm kernel shell using microwave radiation-assisted K2CO3 activation for methylene blue dye removal: Optimization by response surface methodology,” Diam Relat Mater, vol. 131, p. 109581, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109581.

[11] M. Y. Alazaiza, T. M. Alzghoul, T. Al Maskari, S. A. Amr, and D. E. Nassani, “Analyzing the Evolution of Research on Student Awareness of Solid Waste Management in Higher Education Institutions,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 13, p. 5422, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16135422.

[12] Y. Hanafi et al., “Unveiling the intersection of technology and pedagogy: a domain-specific exploration for developing religious moderation content with an exploratory and Rasch Perspective,” British Journal of Religious Education, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01416200.2024.1871234.

[13] H. Y. Agustian et al., “Learning outcomes of university chemistry teaching in laboratories: A systematic review of the empirical literature,” Review of Education, vol. 10, no. 2, p. e3360, 2022, doi: 10.1002/rev3.3360.

[14] M. Syukri, N. Neliwati, and Q. Lubis, “The Implementation Integrating Science and Religion in Curriculum Implementation at State Islamic University in North Sumatra,” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 4684–4695, 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.3590.

[15] M. M. Ulkhaq and R. S. George Joseph, “Students’ attitudes towards campus sustainability: a comparison among three universities in Sweden,” Environ Dev Sustain, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 16289–16313, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-02880-5.

[16] R. L. Fucio, M. O. Bato, C. L. Fucio, R. L. Fucio, M. O. Bato, and C. L. Fucio, “Importance of Solid Waste Management in Laguna University for Sustainable Development.,” Puissant, vol. 5, pp. 1137–1154, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.puissant.2024.05.007.

[17] S. Suryaningsih, B. Muslim, and N. A. Wati, “Islamic Values in the Use of Four Steps Teaching Material Development (4-STMD) Method in Teaching Stoichiometry Material,” TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 78–87, 2020, doi: 10.15408/tjems.v7i1.14066.

[18] M. Ramli, B. Muslim, and S. N. Fajriah, “Integrasi Pencemaran Logam Berat dan Islam Menggunakan Metode 4-STMD,” Jurnal As-Salam, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 102–115, 2019, doi: 10.37249/as-salam.v3i3.141.

[19] V. Zamanzadeh, R. Ghaffari, L. Valizadeh, H. Karimi-Moonaghi, A. N. Johnston, and S. Alizadeh, “Challenges of objective structured clinical examination in undergraduate nursing curriculum: Experiences of faculties and students,” Nurse Educ Today, vol. 103, p. 104960, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104960.

[20] D. Pratama, “Pengembangan skala thurstone metode equal appearing interval untuk mengukur sikap moderasi beragama siswa sekolah menengah atas,” Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 71, 2020, doi: 10.26740/jptt.v11n1.p71-82.

[21] E. Avinç and F. Doğan, “Digital literacy scale: Validity and reliability study with the rasch model,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), pp. 1–47, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12662-7.

[22] C. D. Manuel, C. R. Magalhães, C. M. Huber, L. Smerek, A. F. Costa, and J. R. Alves, “Cross-Cultural Adaptation of a Questionnaire Measuring Organizational Citizenship Behavior towards the Environment,” Adm Sci, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 57, 2024, doi: 10.3390/admsci14030057.

[23] C. E. Mundy, M. Potgieter, and M. K. Seery, “A design-based research approach to improving pedagogy in the teaching laboratory,” Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 266–275, 2024, doi: 10.1039/D3RP00134B.

[24] R. A. da Silva and F. C. G. C. de Vasconcelos, “ Learning through chemistry simulations: an analysis of cognitive skill levels,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 6967–6987, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10911-1.

[25] D. Sarıtaş, H. Özcan, and A. Adúriz-Bravo, “Observation and inference in chemistry teaching: a model-based approach to the integration of the macro and submicro levels,” Sci Educ (Dordr), vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1289–1314, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00212-3.

[26] Z. Yan, E. Panadero, X. Wang, and Y. Zhan, “A systematic review on students’ perceptions of self-assessment: usefulness and factors influencing implementation,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 81, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09667-w.

[27] D. Varier, A. Kitsantas, X. Zhang, and M. Saroughi, “Self-efficacy for self-assessment: Development and validation of the SEESA-AW scale for argumentative writing,” Int J Educ Res, vol. 110, p. 101885, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101885.

[28] J. A. Sloan and L. F. Scharff, “Student self-assessment: Relationships between accuracy, engagement, perceived value, and performance,” Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 148, no. 3, p. 04022004, 2022, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000073.

[29] S. Bekesiene, A. V Vasiliauskas, Š. Hošková-Mayerová, and V. Vasilienė-Vasiliauskienė, “Comprehensive assessment of distance learning modules by fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 409, 2021, doi: 10.3390/math9040409.

[30] J. Sun, A. E. Adegbosin, V. Reher, G. Rehbein, and J. Evans, “Validity and reliability of a self‐assessment scale for Dental and Oral Health student’s perception of transferable skills in Australia,” European Journal of Dental Education, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2020, doi: 10.1111/eje.12456.

[31] D. Carroll, “Observations of student accuracy in criteria-based self-assessment.,” Assess Eval High Educ, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1088–1105, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1726285.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v9i3.92058

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share