The Development of Scaffolding in Inquiry-Based Learning to Improve Students' Science Process Skills in The Concept of Acid and Base Solution

Syafira Tiaradipa, Intan Lestari, M. Haris Effendi, M. Rusdi

Abstract

The technique of providing learning support in a structured manner to encourage students to learn independently is called scaffolding. This consists of four types questioning, prompting, cueing, and explaining. This study aims to describe the procedure for developing scaffolding in inquiry-based learning that is beneficial to improve students' science process skills in the concept of acid and base solution. The heuristic method in the type of F2-O3-S1+S5+S6-A3 was used in this study to develop the design of the scaffolding. The data were collected using an interview and analyzed using a Delphi technique. Based on the expert validation, it was seen that the scaffolding technique designed was suitable for use. The results of the student trial also showed that the scaffolding technique was effective to be used to improve students' science process skills. It can be concluded that the scaffolding technique on inquiry-based learning was able to improve students' science process skills in the concept of acid and base solution.

Keywords

Scaffolding; Inquiry Model; Science Process Skills; Acid and Base Solution

Full Text:

PDF

References

A. H. Johnstone, “Chemical education research in Glasgow in perspective,” R. Soc. Chem., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 49–63, 2006,

DOI: 10.1039/B5RP90021B

G. B. Samudra, I. W. Suastra, and K. Suma, “Permasalahan-Permasalahan yang Dihadapi Siswa SMA di Kota Singaraja dalam Mempelajari Fisika,” e-Journal Progr. Pascasarj. Univ. Pendidik. Ganesha, vol. 4, 2014.

Google Scholar

R. Mamin, “Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Scaffolding Pada Pokok Bahasan Sistem Periodik Unsur,” J. Chem., vol. 10, pp. 55–60, 2008.

Google Scholar

Z. Chairani, “Scaffolding dalam pembelajaran matematika 5,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2015.

DOI: 10.33654/math.v1i2.12

C. Quintana et al., “A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 37–41, 2004.

DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4

T. H. Agustanti, “Implementasi Metode Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Biologi,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2012.

Google Scholar

M. H. Effendi-Hasibuan, Harizon, Ngatijo, and A. Mukminin, “The inquiry-based teaching instruction (IbTI) in Indonesian secondary education: What makes science teachers successful enact the curriculum?,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 18–33, 2019.

DOI: 10.12973/tused.10263a

E. Yuriev, S. Naidu, L. S. Schembri, and J. L. Short, “Scaffolding the development of problem-solving skills in chemistry : guiding novice students out of dead ends and false starts,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2017.

DOI: 10.1039/C7RP00009J

D. Kurniawati, M. Masykuri, and S. Saputro, “Scaffolding sebagai Alternatif Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematika,” J. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 88–95, 2016.

Google Scholar

A. Hasanah and L. Utami, “Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Scaffolding untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik pada Materi Momentum, Impuls dan Tumbukan Kelas X SMA N 12 Pekanbaru,” J. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 56–64, 2017.

Google Scholar

R. D. Aprian, Sunyono, and T. Efkar, “Pengaruh Strategi Scaffolding pada Pembelajaran SiMaYang dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Kim., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017.

Google Scholar

B. Subali, “Bias Item Test ff Divergen Pattern ff Science Process Skill and It’s Modification as Creativity Test,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 2, pp. 309–334, 20010.

Google Scholar

J. Lee and S. Jang, “A Methodological Framework for Instructional Design Model Development: Critical Dimensions and Synthesized Procedures,” Educ. Tech Res. Dev, vol. 62, pp. 743–765, Springer, 2014.

DOI: 10.1007/s11423-014-9352-7

G. R. Morrison, S. M. Ross, H. K. Kalman, and J. E. Kemp, Designing Effective Instruction, Seventh. United States of America: Jonh Wiley &. Sons, 2013.

Google Scholar

Rusdi, Penelitian Desain dan Pengembangan Kependidikan: Konsep, Prosedur dan Sintesis Pengetahuan Baru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Google Scholar

Kemendikbud, Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran Pada Kurikulum 2013 Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud. 2016.

Google Scholar

D. P. Danarjati, Murtiadi, and A. R. Ekawati, Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2014.

Google Scholar

N. N. Parwati, I. P. P. Suryawan, and Ratih Ayu Apsari, Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2018.

Google Scholar

Hosnan, Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2014.

Google Scholar

J. Van De Pol, M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen, “Scaffolding in Teacher – Student Interaction : A Decade of Research,” Springer, 2010.

DOI: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

M. H. Effendi-Hasibuan, “Model Bimbingan Pembelajaran Systematic Scaffolding Guidance (Supportive Guidance, Strategic Guidance, Interrogative Guidance),” 000160197, 2019.

"> Google Scholar

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.