The Effectiveness of Blended Learning Oriented LKS with POGIL Strategy on High School Chemical Bond Subject

Siti Lailatul Mufarohah, Kusumawati Dwiningsih

Abstract

The rapid development of technology requires innovation in learning. One of the innovations is blended learning. The concept of blended learning is mixing of face-to-face learning model in the classroom with online learning. The blended learning will strengthen the conventional learning model conducted in the classroom through the development of education technology. Blended learning can be combined with constructivist and cooperative learning using POGIL strategy. POGIL contextual- based blended learning is suitable for chemical bonding subject because it has abstract characteristics involves atoms and electrons which are macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic particles. The aim of this research is to create the effective student worksheet blended learning-based viewed from students pretest and posttest results. The development of model in student worksheet uses 4D models (four D models) from Thiagarajan which consists of 4 development stages: Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate. Focus of this study was limited to the stage of develop. The data were collected using a test sheet in the form of pretest and posttest through a limited trial. The results of this research indicate that the usage of blended learning-based student worksheet is effective viewed from N-gain which was obtained as much as 86.67% of students achieving moderate criteria, 6.67% of students achieving high criteria, and 6.67% students reach low criteria.

Keywords

development of LKS; blended learning; POGIL (process oriented guided inquiry learning); four D models (4-D); chemical bonding

Full Text:

PDF

References

Permendikbud, “Salinan Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar Oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah”. Jakarta: kemendikbud, 2014.

Trilling, Bernie & Charles Fadel, 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Fransisco:Jossey-bass, 2009.

Bonk C. J. & Graham C. R., Handbook of Blended Learning Global Perspective, Local Deseigns. San Fransisco: Pfeiffer, 2005.

D. Damayanti, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berorientasi Blended Learning pada Materi Sistem Periodik Unsur kelas X SMA”, Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2017.

Murniati, D.R & Sanjaya, I G.M., “Pengembangan Perangkat Pem-belajaran Kimia Berbasis Blended Learning di SMA Negeri 7 Kediri”. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 2 no. 3, 2013.

Al-ani, W.T., “Blended Learning Approach Using Moodle and Student’s Achievement at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman”. Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 2, no. 3, 2013.

Gabel, Dorothy, “Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research:A Look to the Future”, Journal of Chemistry Education, vol. 76, no. 4, 1999.

Haluk Ozmen, “Some Student Miskonception in Chemistry: A Literature Review of Chemical Bonding”, Journal of Science Education and Technology. vol.13, no.2, pp.147-159, 2004.

Effendy, Ilmu Kimia untuk Siswa SMA dan MA Kelas X. Malang: Indonesian Academic Publishing, 2016.

Hanson, David M, Instructor’s Guided to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. Stony Brook University: Pasific Crest, 2006.

K, Asisul. “Pengaruh Blended Learning dalam Strategi POGIL pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Berbasis Kontekstual Terhadap Hasil belajar Kognitif dan Motivasi Siswa”, Prosiding Seminar Kimia dan Pembelajarannya (SNKP) pada tanggal 27 November 2016 di Universitas Negeri Malang, 2016.

Trianto, Mendesain Model Pem-belajaran Inovatif-Progesif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.

Thiagarajan,S., Semmel, Dorothy S & Semmel, melvynl, Instructional Development for Training Teacher of Exceptional Childern. Asourcbook. Bloomingtonon Teaching the Handicapped: Indiana University, 1974.

Ridwan, Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.

Nieveen, N., “Formative Evaluation In Educational Design Research” in Tjeerd Plomp and Nienke Nieveen (Ed). 2010. An Introduction to Educational Design Research Enschede: SLO. Netherland Institute for Curiculum Development, 2010.

Nur, Mohamad, Wikandari Prima R., & Sugiarto Bambang, Teori-Teori Pembelajaran Kognitif. Edisi 2. Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah, 2004.

Aboukhatwa, Elsayed A, “Blended Learning as a Pedagogical Approach to Improve the TraditionalLearning and E-learning Environments”, IACQA 2012, (online)(http://se.uofk.edu/multisites/UpfK_se/images/stories/se/paperrs/85.pdf), diaksestanggal 18 Januari 2015.

Husamah, Pembelajaran Bauran (Blended Learning). Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, 2014.

Rahmana, A.Y & Endang Susantini. “Validitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Blended learning Terintregrasi Edmodo Pada Sub Materi Katabolisme Karbohidrat”. Unesa Journal of Biologi Education. vol. 4, no. 2, 2015.

Pitaloka, Raffani O. A. dan Kusumawati Dwiningsih, “Developing Multimedia Interactive Based Blended Learning at kimia Subject Class XII”. Proceedings of International Research Clinic & Scientific Publications of Educational Technology, 2016.

Arham, Uliya Ulil dan Kusumawati Dwiningsih, “Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Blended Learning pada Materi Pokok Kimia Unsur Kelas XII SMA”. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education. vol. 5, no. 2, 2016.

Dwiningsih, Kusumawati; Sukarmin; and Muchlis, “Building the Design of Blended learning in Web Lite-Based and Industrial Visits Inorganic Chemical Course” Advanced Science Letters, Vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 11976-11981(6), 2017.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.