The Effect of Chemistry Learning with PjBL and PBL Model Based on Tetrahedral Chemistry Representation in term of Student’s Creativity

Frenika Widyasari, Nurma Yunita Indriyanti, Sri Mulyani

Abstract

This research aims to know: (1) the effect of PjBL and PBL models based on tetrahedral chemistry representation toward student’s achievement; (2) the effect of creativity toward student’s achievement; and (3) the interaction between PjBL and PBL models based on tetrahedral chemistry representation with creativity toward student’s achievement on the colloid subject in SMA Negeri 1 Sragen. This research used quasi experiment method with 2×2 factorial design. Samples of research were determined with cluster random sampling technique and used 2 classes in SMA Negeri 1 Sragen. Data has been collected by test, questionnaire, observation, and literature documents which owned by teacher. Hypothesis testing of this research for cognitive and skill aspects of learning achievement used parametric test of Anova two ways, and for attitude aspect of learning achievement used non-parametric test of Kruskal-Wallis. The results of this research showed that: (1) there was no effect of chemistry learning using of PjBL and PBL models based on tetrahedral chemistry representation toward knowledge, attitude, and skill aspects of student’s achievement; (2) there was effect of high and low creativity toward knowledge and skill aspects of student’s achievement but there was no effect toward attitude aspect of student’s achievement; and (3) there was no interaction between using PjBL and PBL models based on tetrahedral chemistry representation with creativity toward knowledge, attitude, and skill aspects of student’s achievement.

 

Keywords

PjBL; PBL; tetrahedral chemistry; learning achievement; creativity

Full Text:

PDF

References

Mahaffy, P.”Moving Chemistry Education into 3D: A Tetrahedral Metaphor for Understanding Chemistry. Union Carbide Award for Chemical Education”. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(1), 49. 2006.

Mahaffy, P.”the Future Shape of Chemistry Education”. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 5(3), 229–245. 2004.

Jagantara, I. M. W., Adnyana, P. B., & Manik widiyanti, N. L. P. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (Project Based Learning) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa SMA”. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, 4(3), 1–13. 2006.

Waluyo, P. ”Pengaruh Model Pem-belajaran Project Based Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Standar Kompetensi Mengoperasikan Pengendali PLC di SMK Negeri 1 Madiun”. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 3(3), 455–461.2014.

Sudarman. “Problem Based Learning : Suatu Model Pembelajaran untuk Mengembangkan dan Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah”. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif, 2(2), 68-73.2014.

Gomez, J. G. “What Do We Know About Creativity?”. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 31–43. 2007.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan R.I Bidang Pendidikan. ‘ Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013”. Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–118. 2014.

Sari, D.N., Sutikno, dan M.” Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Kreativitas Siswa Melalui Elektroskop Sederhana”. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF2015, IV, 19–24. 2015.

Utomo, T., Wahyuni, D., dan Hariyadi, S. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (Problem Based Learning) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa (Siswa Kelas VIII Semester Gasal SMPN 1 Sumbermalang Kabupaten Situbondo Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013)”. Jurnal Edukasi Unej, 1(1), 5–9. 2014.

Desnylasari, E., Mulyani, S., dan Mulyani, B. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning dan Problem Based Learning Pada Materi Termokimia Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016”. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 5(1), 134–142. 2016.

Johnstone, A. H. “Teaching of Chemistry – Logical or Psychological?” Chemical Education in Europe: Curricula and Policies, 1(1), 9–15. 2000.

Warsono dan Hariyanto. Pembelajaran Aktif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. 2013.

Duch, Barbara J., Groh, Susan E., and Allen, D. E. The Power of Problem-Based Learning. Virginia: Stylus Publising, LCC.2001.

Lukman, L. A., Martini, K. S., & Utami, B. “Efektivitas Metode Pembelajaran Project-Based Learning (PjBL) disertai Media Mind Mapping terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa pada Materi Pokok Sistem Koloid di Kelas XI IPA SMA Al Islam 1 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014”. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 4(1), 113–119. 2015.

Pudihastuti, D. “Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kreativitas Belajar siswa terhadap Prestasi Belajar Akuntansi pada Siswa Kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Sragen Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014”. Jurnal Publikasi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 2013.

Kholis, M. . “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kimia Menggunakan Model Learning Cycle dan Model STAD terhadap Hasil Belajar ditinjau dari Kreativitas Siswa pada Siswa Kelas XII IPA SMA Negeri Kabupaten Kudus”. Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan. Universitas Sebelas Maret. 2013.

Munandar, U. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2004.

Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., & Benedek, M. “Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis”. Intelligence, 57, 105–117, 2016.

Pramanawati, R.I. “Studi Komparasi Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) dengan Metode Eksperimen dan Metode Proyek terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Siswa pada Materi Pokok Koloid SMA N 1 Teras Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012”. Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2013.

Lou, S., Chung, C., Dzan, W., & Shih, R. “Construction of a Creative Instructional Design Model Using Blended, Project-Based Learning for College Students”. Creative Education, 3(7), 2012.

Abdurrozak, R., Jayadinata, A.K., dan ‘Atun, I. “Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa”. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1), 871–880. 2016.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.