PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PREDICT-OBSERVE-EXPLAIN (POE) DAN THINK-TALK-WRITE (TTW) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR BIOLOGI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR ANALITIS SISWA

Rifad Nurma Yuliansyah, Mohammad Masykuri, Puguh Karyanto

Abstract

Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen. Populasi adalah semua siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Karangpandan tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Sampel diambil menggunakan cluster random sampling sejumlah 2 kelas. Kelas XI IPA 2 diberi model pembelajaran dengan Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) dan kelas XI IPA 4 diberi model pembelajaran dengan Think-Talk-Write (TTW). Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan tes untuk hasil belajar siswa dan  kemampuan berpikir analitis, angket untuk kreativitas siswa, hipotesis diuji dengan uji anacova. Dari analisis data dapat disimpulkan bahwa: 1) ada pengaruh model Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) dan Think-Talk-Write (TTW) terhadap hasil belajar, 2) ada pengaruh   kreativitas tinggi  dan  rendah terhadap hasil belajar, 3) ada pengaruh kemampuan berpikir analisis tinggi dan rendah terhadap hasil belajar, 4) tidak ada interaksi model pembelajaran Think-Talk-Write (TTW) dan model pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) dengan kreativitas dikategorikan tinggi, rendah  terhadap hasil belajar, 5) tidak ada interaksi model pembelajaran Think-Talk-Write (TTW) dan model pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) dengan kemampuan berpikir analitis dikategorikan tinggi, rendah  terhadap hasil belajar, 6) ada interaksi   kreativitas dan kemampuan berpikir analitis dikategorikan tinggi, rendah  terhadap hasil belajar, 7) tidak ada interaksi model pembelajaran Think-Talk-Write (TTW) dan model pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) dengan kretivitas dan  kemampuan berpikir analitis dikategorikan tinggi, rendah  terhadap hasil belajar.

Keywords

Predict-Observe-Explain (POE); Think-Talk-Write (TTW); Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis; Kreativitas; Hasil Belajar; Sistem Gerak

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adebayo, Famakinwa et al.(2015). Generative and Predict-Observe-Explain Instructional Strategies: Towards Enhancing Basic Science Practical Skills of Lower Primary School Pupil . International Journal of Elementary Education, vol 4(4), 86-92

Ayvacı, Şevki Hakan .(2013). Investigating The Effectiveness Of Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy On Teaching Photo Electricity Topic. Turkey Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 12 (5). 548-564.

Coştu,Bayram .( 2008). Learning Science Through The PDEODE Teaching Strategy: Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education.Vol 4(1).3-9

Costu, Baryam. et al .( 2011) . Investigating The Effectiveness Of A POE-Based Teaching Activity On Students Understanding Of Condensation. Department Chemistry Education Journal, Dokuz Eylul University, Vol 40, 47–67.

Dimyati, Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Rineke Cipta

Dimyati Dan Mujdiono,(2009),Belajar Dan Pembelajaran.Jakarta : Penerbit Rineka Cipta,

Dunn, Michael.(2013).Comparing Two Story-Writing Mnemonic Strategies: A Randomized Control Trial Study. International Journal Of Special Education, Washington State University, Vol 28( 3), 20-31

Helping Students Make Sense Of Everyday Situations .(2008). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, TURKEY : Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, Vol. 4(1), 3-9

Hilario, Jose.S.(2015). The Use of Predict-Observe-Explain-Explore (POEE) as a New Teaching Strategy in General Chemistry-Laboratory Development of Predict-observe-explain Strategy for Teaching Flow Injection at Undergraduate Chemistry . International Journal of Education and Research,vol 3(2), 37-48

Kearney, Matthew Dan David F. Treagust. (2000). An Investigation On The Classroom Use Of Prediction-Observation-Explanation Computer Task Designed To Elicit And Promote Discussion Of Student’s Conception Of Force And Motion. Paper Presented At The 2000 National Association For Research In Science Technical Meeting, April 28-31, 2000, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Kibirige, Israel. et al. (2014). The Effect of Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy on Learners’ Misconceptions about Dissolved Salts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER Publishing, Vol 12 (5), 2039-2117

Listiana, Lina .(2015). Empowering Students’ Meta Cognitive Skills Through New Teaching Strategy (Group Investigation Integrated With Think TalK Write) In Biology Classroom. Journal of Baltic science education, Vol 15(3),391-400

Nana. Sudjana Dan Ibrahim. (2004). Penelitian Dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algesindo

Nana Sudjana. (2009). Media Pengajaran. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo

Nana, et al.(2014). The Development Of Predict, Observe, Explain, Elaborate, Write,and Evaluate (Poe2we) Learning Model in Physics Learning At Senior Secondary School. Journal of Education and Practice, vol 5 (19), 56-65

Munandar, Utami.(2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.

Mokhtarifar, Forouzan et al .(2014). Investigating The Relation Between Critical Thinking In The Dimensionof Creativity, Cognitive Maturity And Mental Involvement And The Religious Identity Of Educational Sciences And Psychology Students Of Isfahan University. Journal of education and practice, Vol 5(37) 93-103

Osdemir, Hakan.(2011). Effect Of Laboratory Activities Designed Based On Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) Strategy On Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Understanding Of Acid base Subject . Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), ISSN 1308-8971, 169-174

Rivard L. P. Dan Straw, S. P. (2000). The Effect Of Talk And Writing On Learning Science: An Exploratory Study. Journal Of Science Education, 84 (5), Pp.566-593.

Rustaman, Nuryani . (2005). Stategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung : UPI

Sagala, Saiful . (2008). Konsep Dan Makna Pembelajaran.Bandung: Alfa Beta

Sardiman,A.M. (2007). Interaksi Dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Samosir, Heppy. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain-Write (POEW) Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Kalor Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Tesis PPS UPI Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan

Slavin,Robert. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan, Teori Dan Praktek. Bandung : Indeks

Saragih, Saat .(2014. The Improving of Problem Solving Ability and Students’ Creativity Mathematical by Using Problem Based Learning in SMP Negeri 2 Siantar, Journal of education and practice, Vol 5(35), 123-132

Sardiman. (2004).Interaksi Dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Suminar, Ratna .P. (2015. The Effectiveness Of TTW (Think-Talk-Write) Strategy In Teaching Writing Descriptive Text. Journal of English Language and Learning, vol 2 (2) 229-304

Sumirat, Ari.L. (2014) The Effectivenes Of A Cooperative Learning Strategy Think-Talk-Write Type On The Student’s Compentence In Mathematical Communication And Disposition. Open Journal Training Dan Education, Vol 1(2), 1-10

Suparno, Paul. (2007) . Metodologi Pembelajaran Fisika: Konstruktivistik & Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Suspriyati. Ninik.(2012). Pembelajaran Biologi Dengan Pendekatan Science, Environment, Technology, And Society (SETS) Menggunakan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dan Model Predict, Observe, Explain, And Write (POEW) Ditinjau Dari Kreativitas Dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa”. (Studi Kasus Pembelajaran Biologi Materi Eubacteria Dan Archaeobacteria Siswa Kelas X Semester I Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012 SMA Negeri 5 Surakarta). Tesis, Surakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Sains Program Pasca Sarjana.

Usman, Moh Uzer. (2009). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wartono Dkk . (2004). Materi Pelatihan Terintegrasi Sains. Jakarta : Depdiknas

Wah Liew, C. & Treagust, D. 2004. The Effectiveness Predict – Observe – Explain (POE) Technique In Diagnosing Studen’s Understanding Of Science And Identifying Their Level Of Achievement

Wenno I.H . (2008).Strategi Belajar Mengajar Sains Berbasis Kontekstual. Yogyakarta: Intimedia

Wulan, Rikhi .(2015). Improving Students’ Mathematical Communication Through Scientific Approach And TTW (Think Talk Write). International journal of education. Vol 2(10), 35-46

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.