A Short Review of Online Learning Assessment Strategies

Adan Amer, Gaganpreet Sidhu, Zhao Bo, Seshasai Srinivasan

Abstract


The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a paradigm shift in how teachers, instructors and students approach teaching and learning, especially concerning the migration to online learning environments. One of the most challenging aspects of adapting to online/virtual education is evaluating students’ knowledge acquisition through learning assessments. The lack of face-to-face proctoring renders many of the traditional paper-based assessment techniques impractical, especially in the context of an engineering education that is heavily focused on applied learning. Since virtual education now represents an important evolution in education, it is pertinent for educators to familiarise themselves with the new possibilities of assessment methods in a virtual setting and to design tailored assessment strategies for individual courses. This article reviews and summarises commonly employed virtual assessment methods that are applicable to most engineering educational situations, such as open-book exams, online quizzes, or peer assessments. The paper also discusses some concerns that may arise in implementing these methods. Additionally, there is a particular focus on qualitatively-graded ePortfolios as a unique pedagogical tool in the virtual classroom due to their role as both a repository for storing learning artifacts and a vehicle for advancing students’ learning experience.


Keywords


Engineering Pedagogy; ePortfolios; Online Assessments; Pandemic Learning; Problem-Based Learning

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Abubakar, A. M., & Adeshola, I. (2019). Digital Exam and Assessments: A Riposte to Industry 4.0. In A. Elçi, L. L. Beith, & A. Elçi (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Faculty Development for Digital Teaching and Learning (pp. 245–263). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8476-6.ch013

Ahmadzadeh, M., Elliman, D., & Higgins, C. (2005). An analysis of patterns of debugging among novice computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(3), 84–88. doi: 10.1145/1151954.1067472

Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355.

Anderson, L. (2018). A critique of grading: Policies, practices, and technical matters. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 49–49. doi: 10.14507/epaa.26.3814

Ardid, M., Gómez-Tejedor, J. A., Meseguer-Dueñas, J. M., Riera, J., & Vidaurre, A. (2015). Online exams for blended assessment. Study of different application methodologies. Computers & Education, 81, 296–303. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.010

Barr, N. B., & Johnson, J. E. (2021). Trajectories in Turmoil: A Case Study of Engineering Students’ Reactions to Disruptions in Their Community of Practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(1), 38–51. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2021.3057149

Barrett, H. (2010). Balancing the Two Faces of ePortfolios. Educação, Formação & Tecnologias, 3(1), 6–14. Retrieved from http://eft.educom.pt/index.php/eft/article/view/161

Barrett, H., & Wilkerson, J. (2004). Competing Paradigms in Portfolio Approaches [Internet Article]. Retrieved 10 August 2022, from http://electronicportfolios.com/systems/paradigms.html

Beebe, R., Vonderwell, S., & Boboc, M. (2010). Emerging patterns in transferring assessment practices from F2f to online environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 8(1), 1–12.

Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80.

Bloodgood, R. A., Short, J. G., Jackson, J. M., & Martindale, J. R. (2009). A Change to Pass/Fail Grading in the First Two Years at One Medical School Results in Improved Psychological Well-Being. Academic Medicine, 84(5), 655–662. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819f6d78

Boe, B., Hill, C., Len, M., Dreschler, G., Conrad, P., & Franklin, D. (2013). Hairball: Lint-inspired static analysis of scratch projects. Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 215–220. doi: 10.1145/2445196.2445265

Bogoslowski, S., Geng, F., Gao, Z., Rajabzadeh, A. R., & Srinivasan, S. (2021). Integrated Thinking—A Cross-Disciplinary Project-Based Engineering Education. In M. E. Auer & D. Centea (Eds.), Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0 (pp. 260–267). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_28

Boitshwarelo, B., Reedy, A. K., & Billany, T. (2017). Envisioning the use of online tests in assessing twenty-first century learning: A literature review. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 16. doi: 10.1186/s41039-017-0055-7

Brilleslyper, M., Ghrist, M., Holcomb, T., Schaubroeck, B., Warner, B., & Williams, S. (2012). What’s The Point? The Benefits of Grading Without Points. PRIMUS, 22(5), 411–427. doi: 10.1080/10511970.2011.571346

Bryant, L. H., & Chittum, J. R. (2013). ePortfolio Effectiveness: A(n Ill-Fated) Search for Empirical Support. International Journal of EPortfolio, 3(2), 189–198.

Bryce, R., Mayo, Q., Andrews, A., Bokser, D., Burton, M., Day, C., … Noble, T. (2013). Bug catcher: A system for software testing competitions. Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 513–518. Denver, Colorado. doi: 10.1145/2445196.2445348

Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 210–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.210

Büyükduman, İ., & Sirin, S. (2010). Learning portfolio (LP) to enhance constructivism and student autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.012

Carleton University. (n.d.). ECOR 2995: Engineering Portfolio. Retrieved 9 August 2022, from Faculty of Engineering and Design website: https://carleton.ca/engineering-design/current-students/undergrad-academic-support/ecor2995/

Centea, D., & Srinivasan, S. (2017). Enhancing Student Learning through Problem Based Learning. Proceedings of the PBL, Social Progress and Sustainability, 376–385. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.

Centea, D., & Srinivasan, S. (2019). Assessment in Problem-Based Learning Using Mobile Technologies. In M. E. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), Mobile Technologies and Applications for the Internet of Things (pp. 337–346). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11434-3_37

Centea, D., & Srinivasan, S. (2021). Collaboration with Industry in the Development and Assessment of a PBL Course. In M. E. Auer & D. Centea (Eds.), Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0 (pp. 181–188). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_20

Chen, C., Fan, J., & Jury, M. (2017). Are perceived learning environments related to subjective well-being? A visit to university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.001

Clemmer, R., Spencer, J., Lackeyram, D., Thompson, J., Gharabaghi, B., VanderSteen, J., … Zytner, R. G. (2015). Use of Eportfolio Tool for Reflection in Engineering Design. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5839

Dermo, J. (2009). e-Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e-assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00915.x

Dominguez Garcia, S., Garcia Planas, M. I., Palau, R., & Taberna Torres, J. (2015). Modelling E-portfolio for a Linear Algebra undergraduate course. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 9, 115–121.

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. doi: 10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z

Ellis, A., Carswell, L., Bernat, A., Deveaux, D., Frison, P., Meisalo, V., … Tarhio, J. (1998). Resources, tools, and techniques for problem based learning in computing. ACM SIGCUE Outlook, 26(4), 41–56. doi: 10.1145/309808.309825

Fask, A., Englander, F., & Wang, Z. (2014). Do Online Exams Facilitate Cheating? An Experiment Designed to Separate Possible Cheating from the Effect of the Online Test Taking Environment. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(2), 101–112. doi: 10.1007/s10805-014-9207-1

Geng, F., Srinivasan, S., Gao, Z., Bogoslowski, S., & Rajabzadeh, A. R. (2022). An Online Approach to Project-Based Learning in Engineering and Technology for Post-secondary Students. In M. E. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), New Realities, Mobile Systems and Applications (pp. 627–635). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_56

Gorbunovs, A., Kapenieks, A., & Grada, I. (2015). Advancement of e-Portfolio System to Improve Competence Levels. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1. doi: 10.17770/sie2013vol1.152

Greaves, L. A., McKendry, J., Muhammad, N., & Srinivasan, S. (2022). The Transition from In-Class to Online Lectures During a Pandemic: Understanding the Student Experience. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 376–392.

Hanbidge, A. S., McMillan, C., & Scholz, K. W. (2018). Engaging with ePortfolios: Teaching Social Work Competencies through a Program-wide Curriculum. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(3), 1–21. doi: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.3.3

Heckler, N. C., Rice, M., & Bryan, C. H. (2013). Turnitin Systems: A Deterrent to Plagiarism in College Classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 229–248. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2013.10782604

Hewson, C. (2012). Can online course-based assessment methods be fair and equitable? Relationships between students’ preferences and performance within online and offline assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 488–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00473.x

Hoidn, S., & Kärkkäinen, K. (2014). Promoting skills for innovation in higher education: A literature review on the effectiveness of problem-based learning and of teaching behaviours. In OECD Education Working Paper (Vol. 15). Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3tsj67l226-en

Hylton, K., Levy, Y., & Dringus, L. P. (2016). Utilizing webcam-based proctoring to deter misconduct in online exams. Computers & Education, 92–93, 53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.002

Impedovo, M. A., Ritella, G., & Ligorio, M. B. (2013). Developing Codebooks as a New Tool to Analyze Students’ ePortfolios. International Journal of EPortfolio, 3(2), 161–176.

Ivanova, O. (2017). The Use of E-portfolio to Develop English Language Learners’ Autonomy and Independence. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 60(4), 155–165. doi: 10.33407/ITLT.V60I4.1677

Jacobs, J. L., Samarasekera, D. D., Shen, L., Rajendran, K., & Hooi, S. C. (2014). Encouraging an environment to nurture lifelong learning: An Asian experience. Medical Teacher, 36(2), 164–168. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.852168

Jenson, J. D. (2011). Promoting Self-Regulation and Critical Reflection through Writing Students’ Use of Electronic Portfolio. International Journal of EPortfolio, 1(1), 49–60.

Joyes, G., Gray, L., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2010). Effective practice with e-portfolios: How can the UK experience inform implementation? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 15–27. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1099

Kallia, M. (2017). Assessment in Computer Science courses: A Literature Review. London: Royal Society. Retrieved from https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/assessment-in-computer-science-courses-a-literature-review(9e12b87d-2ff1-40ef-ad57-322e671b37b1)/export.html

Kearney, S., Perkins, T., & Kennedy-Clark, S. (2016). Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: Analysing the relative validity of the AASL (Authentic Assessment for Sustainable Learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 840–853. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1039484

Khan, S., & Khan, R. A. (2019). Online assessments: Exploring perspectives of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 661–677. doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9797-0

Khoo, L. M. S., Maor, D., & Schibeci, R. (2011). The engineering eportfolio: Enhancing communication, critical thinking and problem solving and team work skills? World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 77, 1027–1032.

Kohn, A. (2011). The case against grades. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 28–33.

Lee-Post, A., & Hapke, H. (2017). Online Learning Integrity Approaches: Current Practices and Future Solutions. Online Learning, 21(1). doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i1.843

Lei, S. A., & Gupta, R. K. (2010). College Distance Education Courses: Evaluating Benefits and Costs from Institutional, Faculty and Students’ Perspectives. Education, 130(4), 616–631.

Levine, J., & Pazdernik, V. (2018). Evaluation of a four-prong anti-plagiarism program and the incidence of plagiarism: A five-year retrospective study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1094–1105. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1434127

Levine, M. (2021, December). Faculty experimenting with ‘ungrading’ find some success. University Times. Retrieved from https://www.utimes.pitt.edu/news/faculty-experimenting

Lewis, L. (2017). ePortfolio as pedagogy: Threshold concepts for curriculum design. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(1–2), 72–85. doi: 10.1177/2042753017694497

Lin, S. s. j., Liu, E. z. f., & Yuan, S. m. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x

Malam, L., & Grundy-Warr, C. (2011). Liberating learning: Thinking beyond ‘the grade’ in field-based approaches to teaching. New Zealand Geographer, 67(3), 213–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2011.01213.x

Matthews-DeNatale, G. (2013). Are We Who We Think We Are? E-Portfolio As A Tool For Curriculum Redesign. Online Learning Journal, 17(4). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183763/

McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40–49.

McMorran, C., & Ragupathi, K. (2020). The promise and pitfalls of gradeless learning: Responses to an alternative approach to grading. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 925–938. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2019.1619073

McMorran, C., Ragupathi, K., & Luo, S. (2017). Assessment and learning without grades? Motivations and concerns with implementing gradeless learning in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 361–377. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1114584

Mellar, H., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., & Yovkova, B. (2018). Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x

Michaelides, M., & Kirshner, B. (2005). Graduate student attitudes toward grading systems. College Quarterly, 8(4), 1–15.

Mitchell, G., & Delaney, D. (2004). An assessment strategy to determine learning outcomes in a software engineering Problem-based learning course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20, 494–502.

Moise, D., Diaconu, A., Negescu, M. D. O., & Gombos, C. C. (2021). Online Education During Pandemic Times: Advantages and Disadvantages. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(4), 63–63. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n4p63

Montana State University. (n.d.). Tips for Creating a Compelling E-Portfolio! - Engineering Communications TOOLKIT | Montana State University. Retrieved 9 August 2022, from https://www.montana.edu/engcommtoolkit/e-portfolio/

Moten, J., Fitterer, A., Brazier, E., Leonard, J., & Brown, A. (2013). Examining online college cyber cheating methods and prevention measures. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 11, 139–146.

Mueller, R. A., & Bair, H. (2018). Deconstructing the Notion of ePortfolio as a ‘High Impact Practice’: A Self-Study and Comparative Analysis. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(3), 1–14. doi: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.3.6

Muhammad, N., Sidhu, G., & Srinivasan, S. (2020). Effect of the Instruction Time of the Day on Student Learning. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 4(2), 126–137. doi: 10.20961/ijpte.v4i2.43070

Muhammad, N., & Srinivasan, S. (2020a). A Problem Solving Based Approach to Learn Engineering Mathematics. In M. E. Auer, H. Hortsch, & P. Sethakul (Eds.), The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education (pp. 839–848). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_81

Muhammad, N., & Srinivasan, S. (2020b). Implementation of a Course in Computational Modeling of Biological Systems in an Undergraduate Engineering Program. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36, 857–864.

Muhammad, N., & Srinivasan, S. (2021). Online Education During a Pandemic – Adaptation and Impact on Student Learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11, 71. doi: 10.3991/ijep.v11i3.20449

Murphy, L., Fitzgerald, S., Lister, R., & McCauley, R. (2012). Ability to ‘explain in plain english’ linked to proficiency in computer-based programming. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, 111–118. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/2361276.2361299

Myyry, L., & Joutsenvirta, T. (2015). Open-book, open-web online examinations: Developing examination practices to support university students’ learning and self-efficacy. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(2), 119–132. doi: 10.1177/1469787415574053

Nguyen, C. F. (2013). The ePortfolio as a Living Portal: A Medium for Student Learning, Identity, and Assessment. International Journal of EPortfolio, 3(2), 135–148.

Page, L., & Cherry, M. (2018). Comparing Trends in Graduate Assessment: Face-to-Face vs. Online Learning. Assessment Update, 30(5), 3–15. doi: 10.1002/au.30144

Parkes, K. A., Dredger, K. S., & Hicks, D. (2013). EPortfolio as a Measure of Reflective Practice. International Journal of EPortfolio, 3(2), 99–115.

Peet, M., Lonn, S., Gurin, P., Boyer, K. P., Matney, M., Marra, T., … Daley, A. (2011). Fostering Integrative Knowledge through ePortfolios. International Journal of EPortfolio, 1(1), 11–31.

Pippin, T. (2014). Roundtable on Pedagogy: Response: Renounce Grading? Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 82(2), 348–355. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lfu002

Pitts, W., & Ruggirello, R. (2012). Using the e-Portfolio to Document and Evaluate Growth in Reflective Practice: The Development and Application of a Conceptual Framework. International Journal of EPortfolio, 2(1), 49–74.

Rajabzadeh, A. R., Mehrtash, M., & Srinivasan, S. (2022). Multidisciplinary Problem-Based Learning (MPBL) Approach in Undergraduate Programs. In M. E. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), New Realities, Mobile Systems and Applications (pp. 454–463). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_41

Rassudov, L., & Korunets, A. (2022). Virtual Labs: An Effective Engineering Education Tool for Remote Learning and not only. 2022 29th International Workshop on Electric Drives: Advances in Power Electronics for Electric Drives (IWED), 1–4. doi: 10.1109/IWED54598.2022.9722375

Richards-Schuster, K., Ruffolo, M. C., Nicoll, K. L., Distelrath, C., & Galura, J. A. (2014). Using ePortfolios to Assess Program Goals, Integrative Learning, and Civic Engagement: A Case Example. International Journal of EPortfolio, 4(2), 133–141.

Rickers, D. (2021, February 12). Pandemic prompts universities to offer optional gradeless assessment. Retrieved 13 July 2022, from The Niagara Independent website: https://niagaraindependent.ca/pandemic-prompts-universities-to-offer-optional-gradeless-assessment/

Riesbeck, C. (2017). 20 Years Gradeless: Having My Cake and Eating It Too. Retrieved 13 July 2022, from Teachers Going Gradeless website: https://www.teachersgoinggradeless.com/blog/2017/07/10/20-years-gradeless

Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003

Rohe, D. E., Barrier, P. A., Clark, M. M., Cook, D. A., Vickers, K. S., & Decker, P. A. (2006). The benefits of pass-fail grading on stress, mood, and group cohesion in medical students. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81(11), 1443–1448. doi: 10.4065/81.11.1443

Russell, C., & Shepherd, J. (2010). Online role-play environments for higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 992–1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01048.x

Saad, L., Busteed, B., & Ogisi, M. (2013, October 15). Online Education Rated Best for Value and Options. Retrieved 5 July 2022, from Jhunjhunwalas website: https://jhunjhunwalas.wordpress.com/2013/10/15/online-education-rated-best-for-value-and-options/

Sato, T., & Haegele, J. A. (2018). Undergraduate Kinesiology Students’ Experiences in Online Motor Development Course. Online Learning, 22(2), 271–288. doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i2.1361

Schinske, J., & Tanner, K. (2014). Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently). CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 159–166. doi: 10.1187/cbe.CBE-14-03-0054

Sekendiz, B. (2018). Utilisation of formative peer-assessment in distance online education: A case study of a multi-model sport management unit. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 682–694. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1396229

Shuhidan, S., Hamilton, M., & D’Souza, D. (2010). Instructor Perspectives of Multiple-Choice Questions in Summative Assessment for Novice Programmers. Computer Science Education, 20(3), 229–259.

Sidhu, G., Srinivasan, S., & Centea, D. (2017). Implementation of a problem based learning environment for first year engineering mathematics. PBL, Social Progress and Sustainability, Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.(International Research Symposium on PBL), 201–208. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

Sidhu, Gaganpreet, & Srinivasan, S. (2015). An Intervention-Based Active Learning Strategy Employing Principles of Cognitive Psychology. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association. doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5819

Sidhu, Gaganpreet, & Srinivasan, S. (2018). An Intervention-Based Active-Learning Strategy To Enhance Student Performance in Mathematics. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(1), 85–96. doi: 10.20961/ijpte.v2i1.19568

Sidhu, Gaganpreet, & Srinivasan, S. (2022a). Adopting the Pedagogy of Trust and its Impact on Learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 12(4), 35–46. doi: 10.3991/ijep.v12i4.29719

Sidhu, Gaganpreet, & Srinivasan, S. (2022b). Integration of Ethics, Sustainability, and Social Responsibility Components in an Undergraduate Engineering Course on Finite Element Analysis. International Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), 656–662.

Sidhu, Gaganpreet, Srinivasan, S., & Muhammad, N. (2021). Challenge-based and Competency-based Assessments in an Undergraduate Programming Course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(13), 17–28. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i13.23147

Spivey, M. F., & McMillan, J. J. (2014). Classroom Versus Online Assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 450–456. doi: 10.1080/08832323.2014.937676

Srinivasan, S., & Centea, D. (2015). Applicability of principles of cognitive science in active learning pedagogies. Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop Active Learning in Engineering, 99–104. Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.

Srinivasan, S., & Centea, D. (2018). An Active Learning Strategy for Programming Courses. Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies and Learning, 327–336. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11434-3_36

Srinivasan, S., & Centea, D. (2021). Problem Based Learning in Finite Element Analysis. In M. E. Auer & D. Centea (Eds.), Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0 (pp. 240–246). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_26

Srinivasan, S., & Muhammad, N. (2020). A Constructivist Approach for Mathematics Education. Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 12, 1–5.

Srinivasan, S., Rajabzadeh, A. R., & Centea, D. (2020). A Project-Centric Learning Strategy in Biotechnology. In M. E. Auer, H. Hortsch, & P. Sethakul (Eds.), The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education (pp. 830–838). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_80

Srinivasan, S., & Sidhu, G. (2014). Technology and Intervention-Based Instruction for Improved Student Learning. ICEER 2014. Presented at the International Conferance on Engineering and Research, Hamilton, ON. Hamilton, ON.

Sweeney, T., West, D., Groessler, A., Haynie, A., Higgs, B., Macaulay, J., … Yeo, M. (2017). Where’s the Transformation? Unlocking the Potential of Technology Enhanced Assessment. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5, 1–13. doi: 10.20343/5.1.5

Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6313–6317. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221764110

Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577569

Tsai, N. W. (2016). Assessment of students’ learning behavior and academic misconduct in a student-pulled online learning and student-governed testing environment: A case study. Journal of Education for Business, 91(7), 387–392. doi: 10.1080/08832323.2016.1238808

UC Berkeley. (n.d.). E-Portfolio | Center for Teaching & Learning. Retrieved 9 August 2022, from https://teaching.berkeley.edu/resources/assessment-and-evaluation/design-assessment/e-portfolio

University of Calgary. (n.d.). How does it help engineering students? – EPortfolio Coach. Retrieved 9 August 2022, from https://eportfolio.ucalgary.ca/ssecoach/educational/how-does-it-help-engineering-students/

University of Colorado. (2019, September 18). What is an ePortfolio? Retrieved 9 August 2022, from Engineering Honors Program website: https://cuengineeringhonors.com/current-students/honors-eportfolios-2/eportfolio-requirements/

Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2018). Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: Comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 745–759. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1405238

Utah State University. (n.d.). Engineering Portfolio | College of Engineering. Retrieved 9 August 2022, from https://engineering.usu.edu/advising/launch-your-career/engineering-portfolio

van de Heyde, V., & Siebrits, A. (2019). Higher-Order e-Assessment for Physics in the Digital Age Using Sakai. The Physics Teacher, 57(1), 32–34. doi: 10.1119/1.5084925

Warnock, J. N., & Mohammadi-Aragh, M. J. (2016). Case study: Use of problem-based learning to develop students’ technical and professional skills. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(2), 142–153.

Woods, D. R. (1996). Instructor’s Guide for "Problem-based Learning: How to gain the most from PBL (3rd ed.). Hamilton, ON: McMaster University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v6i2.66579

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Adan Amer, Gaganpreet Sidhu, Zhao Bo, Seshasai Srinivasan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

slot online

nasa4d

nasa4d

togel online

slot

slot gacor

sensa138

slot 5000

situs toto

toto slot

agen judi bola

togel online

slot gacor hari ini

togel online

kakektogel

Majikantoto

slot gacor

mcr4d

mcr4d

sabung ayam

batmantoto

slot gacor

preman68

slot gacor

slot online

poker

slot gacor

https://advertisingseeker.com/

slot gacor

slot online

https://nmims.edu/

slot gacor

situs toto

toto 4d

situs slot

elegant-sophisticated.net

slot pulsa

parlay

slot gacor

slot

slot88

rokokbet

slot88

slot gacor

rokokbet

slot resmi

rokokbet

https://sandiegohills.org/

Situs Toto

Situs Toto

Dana4d

Situs Toto

Pan4D

Toto 4d

slot777

https://lppm.stba-jia.ac.id/

https://ppki.stba-jia.ac.id/

https://journal.iainkudus.id/

https://pmb.iainkudus.id/

https://jim.iainkudus.id/

https://iainkudus.id/

slot777

Situs Toto

Slot777

SITUS TOTO

PAN4D

PAN4D

Slot88

Toto 4d

situs toto

Slot88

https://pjam.propelmas.com/

https://ignitercasino.id/

situs toto

slot

slot thailand

bonus new member 100

slot bet 100

slot777

bonus 138

LINK GACOR

slot gacor

bandar togel

toto slot

kehebohan freddy main mahjong ways 2 bareng teman di kosan

arif naik bet langsung dapat 3 scatter di mahjong ways

zaki begadang tengah malam menang besar di mahjong ways

tomi subuh subuh main mahjong ways dapat scatter 3x langsung cair

perkalian x10 freespin bikin fandi menang besar di mahjong ways 2

penjual kopi raup jackpot di mahjong ways 2 tanpa pola ribet

modal 50 ribu tembus 5 juta kemenangan besar di mahjong ways

pemuda bandung dapat perkalian x10 di mahjong ways 2 tembus 11 juta

petani solo dapat scatter beruntun di mahjong ways tembus 8 juta

misteri freespin muncul 3x beruntun dengan perkalian x10 di mahjong ways

pecahan wild bawa kemenangan besar di mahjong ways

freespin tak terduga tembus 5 juta dengan bet kecil mahjong ways 2

pengalaman daniel dapat freespin jadi kemenangan besar di mahjong ways

eko dapat freespin beruntun bawa kemenangan emas di mahjong ways 2

rahasia scatter merah penuh selayar di mahjong ways

raih kemenangan besar tanpa modal besar bisa cuan harian

jackpot unik bawa kemenangan ekstra di mahjong ways 2

pemuda bogor dapat rezeki nomplok dari mahjong ways 2

cara mudah cari uang jajan tambahan setelah pulang kerja

main mahjong ways bisa cuan setiap hari dengan modal kecil

kisah sukses pegawai tangerang dapat kemenangan 15 juta mahjong ways

pemuda medan dapat rezeki nomplok freespin mahjong ways saat ngopi

jordi pemuda bali freespin ke 8 bawa kemenangan 20 juta mahjong ways 2

satu freespin bawa keuntungan besar jadi jutaan di mahjong ways

keajaiban freespin bawa rezeki besar saldo naik drastis

andri raih cuan besar dari freespin gratis mahjong ways

kemenangan beruntun bikin andre raih rezeki emas di mahjong ways 2

kejutan freespin bikin saldo damar melejit di mahjong ways

rahasia kemenangan mahjong ways 1 dan 2 member baru wede besar

satu freespin bawa kehebohan haris raih kemenangan 19 juta di layar

firman nemu hoki dari spin biasa dapat freespin x10 di mahjong ways

trik main mahjong biar profit terus tanpa modal besar wajib coba

hamid gak nyangka satu kali depo bawa jackpot besar mahjong ways

jefri penasaran coba mahjong ways 2 dari 50 ribu jadi jutaan

tomi spin mahjong ways saat ngantuk dapat freespin 11 juta

paul raih kemenangan pertama 1 juta dengan modal 20 ribu langusng cuan

bongkar trik anton pakai spin turbo 15x panggil scatter

kisah freespin bawa kemenangan besar 12 juta di mahjong ways

rendi dapat kejutan kemenangan besar di mahjong ways

keberuntungan tak terduga bawa rezeki besar di mahjong ways 2

freespin mahjong ways bikin ridwan cuan rp 11 200 000 di tengah malam

samsul pekerja pabrik menang besar di mahjong ways dan ubah hidup

rahasia andri main mahjong ways santai bisa dapat hasil maksimal

cerita ahmad main mahjong ways saat malam dan dapat hasil maksimal

malam hujan johan coba mahjong ways 2 dan freespin muncul tak terduga

kejutan malam untuk randy saat main mahjong ways tanpa pola

rio dapat momen tak terduga dari pecahan x10 di mahjong ways

momen spesial dengan x10 di mahjong ways bawa hasil luar biasa

cerita farhan main mahjong ways 2 dan spin kelima dapat freespin

cerita rizki dapat kemenangan besar di mahjong ways

freespin ke tujuh ilham bawa kejutan manis 5 juta

modal 50 ribu member baru raih kemenangan di mahjong ways

rahasia kemenangan anton di mahjong ways modal 40 ribu

spin turbo santai di kamar bawa kejutan untuk deni di mahjong ways 2

cerita farhan main mahjong ways 2 dan spin kelima dapat freespin

tono dapat kemenangan besar dari freespin di mahjong malam itu

antara kebetulan atau keberuntungan rifki kena freespin mahjong ways 2

andre berhasil raih kemenangan besar dengan freespin x10 mahjong ways

freespin ubah mood ridwan seharian di mahjong ways

kemenangan tak terduga fahri di tengah malam mahjong ways 2

cerita menarik scatter merah dan kemenangan besar mahjong ways 2

cerita leo dan keberuntungan dari mahjong ways beli iphone 16

waktu luang anton berujung kemenangan modal 25 ribu bawa pulang 3 juta

suara freespin pagi hari bikin tomi melek mahjong ways berikan kejutan

cerita unik fahri saat freespin datang tanpa di duga di mahjong ways 2

main mahjong ways 2 pecah tanpa drama

strategi mahjong ways modal receh dengan hasil maksimal

mahjong ways penuh kejutan dan jackpot hari ini

cerita kemenangan berkesan di mahjong ways dari pemain pemula

modal 20 ribu di mahjong ways 2 bawa kemenangan besar

simbol scatter mahjong ways bawa peluang jackpot besar

mahjong ways server thailand gampang dapat simbol scatter

main mahjong ways disini peluang wd terus dengan modal tipis

peluang besar untuk member baru wede di mahjong ways

rahasia bermain mahjong ways 2 strategi yang bisa dipakai rutin

awalnya ikut teman kantor akhirnya jackpot di mahjong ways

cerita fandi tunggu kereta ketemu hoki di mahjong ways 2

saldo naik drastis saat dion dapat freespin mahjong ways 2

cerita lucu rizal panik lihat layar meledak freespin mahjong ways

scatter muncul satu per satu di mahjong pertanda keberuntungan

awal main mahjong ways langsung buka freespin dari 3 scatter

baru 4 spin mahjong wins 3 hadirkan deretan wild di tengah reels

pertengahan game mahjong ways 2 tiba tiba munculkan bonus mini

main 7 spin di mahjong langsung picu double scatter dan freespin

awal spin mahjong wins 3 sudah aktifkan megawild beruntun

baru 6 spin mahjong ways mendadak borong wild dan scatter

di spin ke 9 mahjong ways 2 aktifkan bonus freespin besar

main sebentar di mahjong langsung buka 3 wild berjejer

awal main mahjong ways 2 tak disangka picu double scatter

baru buka mahjong wins 3 sudah hadirkan wild di dua reels

toto togel

toto slot

https://journals.essrak.org/

https://testss.hait.od.ua/

slot thailand

toto slot

toto slot

slot gacor hari ini

toto togel

mahjong ways

miya4d

toto togel

toto slot

situs toto

arista88

slot toto

situs slot gacor

mahjong

magnum188

Dewaslot88

laetoto

spaceman

agen toto play

slot

slot777

bonus new member 100

mahjong slot

Manjur55

spaceman

mdg188

pstoto99

visi4d

slot gacor

slot777

DPRBET

dollar4d

dewaslot88.eu.com

roda4d

mcmbola

hoki99

situs slot

roda4d

toto slot

situs slot gacor

dewahoki

tiga37

PSTOTO99

levis4d

batmantoto

erek erek

slot gacor

qqpulsa

mastogel

batmantoto

Situs Toto

slot gacor

slot88

https://nanostix.co.id/sp2/

lagi4d

https://malcolmhurst.com/

https://xinuosco.com/

https://reportertatu.com/

situs toto

kosmik 4d

bandar togel

situs togel

DUNIATOTO

indo911

situs toto

dewagaruda

coktogel

coktogel

miya4d

Toto Togel

erek erek

levis4d

javtogel

slot

https://micromaterialsresearch.com/

https://tvwesal.com/

toto slot

AMARTOTO

slot

paitogel

ceri123

slot

spaceman slot

Slot777

Situs Slot Gacor

miya4d

slot longhoki

MOM4D

omtogel

toto slot

paitogel

  

International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education

Print ISSN: 2597-7792
Online ISSN: 2549-8525
Website: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijpte/index
Email: ijpte@mail.uns.ac.id
Published by: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Ir. Sutami Street, No. 36A, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah Indonesia

toto togel

slot gacor

titan777

988slot

988bet

slot88

rokokbet

slot gacor

rokokbet

situs gacor

rokokbet

slot777

rokokbet

slot gacor maxwin

https://sandiegohills.org/

https://journal.iainkudus.id/

Situs Toto

Situs Toto

Dana4d

Ppatk

Situs Toto

Toto 4d

Pan4D

Slot88

Toto 4d

https://for4d.mystrikingly.com/

https://ai-photonics.com/

https://isma.edu.pk/

https://tibafs.com/

https://biosuss.com/

https://persydiamondstore.com/contact-us/

Nana4D

slot gacor

https://cogentworkshop.coconutcommunity.org/

SLOT GACOR

IDCOIN188

slot777

slot gacor

slot777

slot gacor

slot gacor

slot777

merahtoto

merahtoto

slot777

hijautoto

kuningtoto

game slot

kuningtoto slot

kuningtoto

link kuningtoto

birutoto

birutoto

slot gacor

ungutoto

link ungutoto

slot gacor

ungutoto

game online

togel online 4d

tototogel

bandar togel

slot777

situs gacor hari ini

situs gacor maxwin

ungutoto

slot gacor maxwin

hijautoto

hijautoto

scatter hitam bikin pengrajin kaligrafi di cianjur tersenyum saat lembur

sore itu penjual tas anyaman pasar kaget dapat scatter hitam lebih dari sekali

saat nunggu anak pulang ngaji wanita penjual es serut ini kenal scatter hitam

awalnya tak sengaja tetapi scatter hitam bikin mantan satgas covid ketagihan

penata rambut pensiun di kampung miliki cerita unik soal scatter hitam

jarang diketahui kolektor kalender jadul ini selalu santai main mahjong ways 2

mahjong ways 2 jadi hiburan favorit pembuat raket bulu tangkis rumahan

awalnya tukang fotocopy di sekolah negeri ini ragu coba mahjong ways 2

pria perakit ac eks pabrik elektronik curi curi waktu main mahjong ways 2

sebelum berangkat ngamen ibu pemain angklung punya kebiasaan cek mahjong ways 2

cerita nyata edi dapat freespin 3x di mahjong ways 2 malam hari

raka gak nyangka scatter mahjong muncul saat lagi beresin kamar

scatter hitam di mahjong ways bikin ramzi jadi senang seharian

pas lagi nyantai di angkringan andre malah dapat freespin

spin pertama mahjong ways 2 bikin yusuf bingung dan kaya

dapat rp 8.300.000 di mahjong ways saat rangga bosan di kantor

jam 2 subuh alwi cuma niat ngecek mahjong ways tapi malah cuan

freespin anton di mahjong ways 2 bikin heboh satu warung

cerita yusuf menang mahjong ways 2 saat hujan deras

galih ternyata hoki di mahjong ways saat lagi di kos teman

indra main mahjong ways 2 dan tembus 4 juta dalam 1 jam

bayu sambil nunggu teman malah jackpot di mahjong ways

agus dapet rezeki mendadak dari freespin mahjong ways 2

yoga menang 5 juta lewat spin malam di mahjong ways

dika coba coba main mahjong ways 2 eh malah profit banyak

ridho berhasil wede 3 6 juta setelah main mahjong ways

toni main mahjong ways 2 sambil ngopi dan dapet jackpot

faris dapet keberuntungan pagi di mahjong ways

irfan tembus 7 juta lewat freespin mahjong ways 2

zaki main iseng mahjong ways berakhir menang 4 juta

hijautoto

hijautoto

birutoto

slot88

merahtoto

slot88

hijautoto

merona4d

merona4d

merona4d

merona4d

merona4d

merona4d

merona4d

merona4d

merona4d

slot gacor terbaru

birutoto

birutoto

hijautoto

kuningtoto

slot777

slot gacor hari ini