ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF CLASS X END-OF-YEAR ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS IN CHEMISTRY SUBJECTS AT SMA BATIK 1 SURAKARTA FOR THE 2019/2020 SCHOOL YEAR USING THE ANATES APPLICATION

Handasatul Naimah, Nurma Yunita Indriyanti, Suryadi Budi Utomo

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine (1) the quality of question items based on their suitability with question indicators, (2) the quality of question items based on the distribution of cognitive domain levels of revised bloom taxonomy, and (3) the quality of question items based on the validity of question items, test reliability, level of difficulty, discriminatory power and effectiveness of deceivers. This quantitative descriptive research uses the Anates application and manual calculations assisted by Microsoft Excel software. The research findings showed that (1) The suitability of the question items with the question indicators showed that 82.5% of the questions were declared in accordance with the question indicators, (2) the quality of the question items based on the distribution of the cognitive domain levels of the revised bloom taxonomy showed an uneven distribution of questions with a ratio of 1:5:14:0:0:0, (3) The validity of the question items had good quality where the results showed that 95% of the question items were declared valid, (4) The reliability of the PAT questions was 0.91 which showed a set the question is reliable, (5) The difficulty level on the question shows that the question has an easy difficulty level with a percentage of 77.5%, (6) The difference in the question shows that the difference in the question is categorized quite well with a percentage of 55%, (7) The effectiveness of the deceiver on the question is categorized quite well with a percentage of 42.5%. Based on these results, six questions met the accepted criteria, 27 needed to be corrected, and seven were discarded because they needed to meet the requirements. Overall, the quality of PAT question items, which are evaluations of class X chemistry subjects, is categorized as a good question

Keywords

Evaluation, Question Item Analysis, Anates

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] Purnomo. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. No.1

[2] Ananda, R., Asrul., dan Rosnita. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran I dan II. Bandung : Citapustaka Media.

[3] Pratiwi, Y. (2016). Analisis Kesesuaian Butir Soal Membaca Bahasa Prancis Kelas XI Semester 1 SMA N 8 Semarang dengan Standar Kompetensi-Kompetensi Dasar dan Indikator. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

[4] Maimun. (2003). Strategi Pengembangan Evaluasi Hasil Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. OKARA. Vol.II

[5] Haniza, N. K. (2019). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semster Gasal Mata Pelajaran Kimia Kelas XII MIPA di SMA Batik 1 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019 Menggunakan Model Rasch dan Iteman. Surakarta: Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret.

[6] Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

[7] Hasiholan, R.H. (2019). Instrumen Evaluasi Non-Tes dalam Penilaian Hasil Belajar Ranah Afektif dan Psikomotorik. J.Teol. dan Pendidik. Kristen Kontekst., vol. 2, no.2.

[8] Khaerudin. (2017). Administrasi Analisis Butir, dan Kaidah Penulisan Tes. J. Madaniyah, vol. 1, pp.97-128.

[9] Matondang, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Medan: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.

[10] Karzuni. (2011). Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Akhir Semester (UAS) Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMK Kelas X Semester Gasal Tahun Ajaran 2010/2011 (Studi Kasus di SMK Muhammadiyah Ungaran). Universitas Negeri Semarang

[11] Mujimin. (2009). Kompetensi Guru dalam Menyusun Butir Soal Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Jawa di Sekolah Dasar.

[12] Susanti, N., Atika, Ria B.P., dan Rosna. Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Semester Ganjil Kimia Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan. J. Inov. Pendidik. Kim.

[13] Maimunah., Mauliandri, R., dan Roza. Kesesuaian Alat Evaluasi Dengan Indikator Pencapaian Kompetensi Dan Kompetensi Dasar Pada RPP Matematika. J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 05, no. 01, pp. 803–811.

[14] Anderson, Lorin W., dan David, R Krathwohl. (2010). Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, Dan Asesmen (Penterjemah: Prihantoro, A. dari A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing : A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives A Bridged Eddition: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. 200. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

[15] Sugiyono. (2005). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV Alfabeta

[16] Sudijono, A. (2015). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

[17] Sudjana, N. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

[18] Banerjee, M., Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., dan Sinha, D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian. J. Statistic.

[19] Mujib, M. Fadli Rasyid. (2019). Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.

[20] Himmah, W.I. (2019). Analisis Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Level Berpikir. J. Medives J. Math. Educ. IKIP Veteran Semarang, vol. 3(1), 55.

[21] Copriady, J., Hasanah, I., Ithaib, A. (2014). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Semester Ganjil Pelajaran Kimia Kelas XI IPA SMA N 10 Pekanbaru Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. pp. 1– 10.

[22] Bandur, A., Budiastuti, D. (2013). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Penelitian, Jilid I. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media,

[23] Umronah. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi Kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 1 Imogiri Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

[24] Sukanti., Fitriatun, A. (2013). Analisis Validitas, Reliabilitas, Dan Tingkat Kesukaran Butir Soal Latihan Ujian Nasional Ekonomi Akuntasi di MAN Maguwoharjo. Kaji. Pendidik. Akuntasi Indones. Ed. 8 Tahun 2016, no. 3, pp. 1–11.

[25] Fikri, Ali A., Yani, A., Burhan, A. (2013). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda, dan Fungsi Distraktor Soal Ujian Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Produktif di SMK N 1 Indralaya Utara Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Anal. Tingkat Kesukaran, pp. 98–115.

[26] Suwarni, N., Rahmayati, D., Miswar, D. (2012). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Geografi Siswa Kelas X SMA Bina Mulya Bandar Lampung Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012.

[27] Yusriza. (2016). Pengukuran & Evaluasi Hasil Dan Proses Belajar. DIY: Pale Media Prima.

[28] Setiawati, dkk. (2015). Indeks Tingkat Kesulitan (ITK) Dan Keberfungsian Distraktor Soal Pilihan Ganda UAS Genap Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. SEMNASBAHTERA, pp. 68–78.

[29] Arifin, A. H. (2017). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Komputer Akuntansi Kelas XI Akuntansi SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Borobudur Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jpkim.v13i1.55780

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.