《等级标准》与印尼本土中文师资培训以培养“中文+职业技能”课程的结合

Stephanie Phanata

Abstract

In recent years, the “Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education” (hereinafter referred to as “Grading Standards”) have attracted worldwide attention for improving the quality of Chinese teaching. However, local Chinese teacher training in Indonesia rarely discusses the role of “Grading Standards”. Many local professional Chinese teachers in universities do not understand how to combine “Grading Standards” with “Chinese + Vocational Skills” courses. This article explains the “Grading Standards” and the methods and directions of local Chinese teacher training in Indonesia. First, we will introduce the requirements and types of “Chinese + Vocational Skills” courses for Chinese language majors in vocational colleges in Indonesia. Secondly, it proposes training content for local Chinese teachers in Indonesia. The final article provides the “Grading Standards” and Indonesian local Chinese teacher training methods based on constructivist theory. The author hopes that it will be helpful to promote the sustainable development of Chinese teacher training in Indonesia and achieve the goals of Chinese teaching.

Keywords

Grading Standards; Indonesian Local Chinese Teacher; Teacher Training; Vocational Skills; Course

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] Arrafii, M. A. (2021). Indonesian teachers’ conceptions of values and dimensions of assessment practice: The effect of teachers’ characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103245.

[2] Douglas, C. M. (2020). A Case Study for Culturally Responsive Teaching in Glodok, Jakarta, Indonesia: the Negotiation of Identity and Instruction for a Chinese-Indonesian Educator. International Journal of Chinese Education, 9(1), 113-126.

[3] Hsiang, T. P., Graham, S., Liu, X., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in textbook selection and use when teaching Chinese as a second language. Reading and Writing, 36(7), 1651-1684.

[4] Kirkpatrick, A., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2017). Language education policy and practice in East and Southeast Asia. Language Teaching, 50(2), 155-188.

[5] Peng, Q., Imron, A., Wiyono, B. B., & Supriyanto, A. (2023). Ten Years of Malang Confucius Institute in Promoting Chinese Language and Culture in Indonesia Higher Education: Its Development and Challenge. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(11), 115-124.

[6] 姜明宝. 汉语国际教育人才培养现状与对策[M]. 北京:北京语言大学出版社,2013

[7] 李泉,丁安琪.专业素养:汉语教师教育的起点与常态——“素养—能力—知识”新模式[J].云南师范大学学报 (对外汉语教学与研究版),2020

[8] 李行健.一部全新的立足汉语特点的国家等级标准——谈《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》的研制与应用[J].国际汉 语教学研究,2021

[9] 李亚男. 《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》解读[J]. 国际汉语教学研究,2021

[10] 刘丽萍. 关于国际中文教育标准化建设的研究与思考[J]. 现代语文,2021

[11] 刘英林. 《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》的研制与应用[J]. 国际汉语教学研究,2021

[12] 刘英林,李佩泽,李亚男. 《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》的中国特色和解读应用[J]. 国际汉语教学研究,2022

[13] 刘英林,马箭飞,赵国成. 国际中文教育中文水平等级标准(国家标准·应用解读本)第一分册:等级描述、音节、汉字[M]. 北京:北京语言大学出版社,2021

[14] 马箭飞.强化标准建设,提高教育质量——国际中文教育标准与考试研讨会大会致辞[J].国际汉语教学研究,2021

[15] 宋春香,李晓东. 国际中文教育与中文考试用书研发概况 ——基于国际中文教学资源动态数据库的量化研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版), 2021

[16] 王添淼.国际中文教师的专业发展[J].云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版),2020

[17] 吴勇毅. 汉语母语国的担当和责任——《国际中文教育中文水平等级标准》制定的意义[J]. 国际汉语教学研究,2021

[18] 袁礼. 标准是多语世界国际中文教育的共同语言[J]. 国际汉语教学研究,2022

[19] 张四红,董理颖. 印度尼西亚国际中文教育的本土化路径研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版),2022

[20] 赵杨. 构建国际中文教育标准体系[J]. 国际汉语教学研究,2021

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.