Analisis tingkat literasi sains siswa pada aspek konteks, konten, dan kompetensi dengan rasch

Roisyah Ashshaddiqah Suwandi, Ayuk Adiana Supriyanti

Sari

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat literasi sains siswa SMA ditinjau dari aspek konteks, isi, dan kompetensi materi viral. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes literasi sains materi viral via google form sebanyak 15 soal. Tes literasi IPA materi virus telah diuji reliabilitas, validitas, daya beda, tingkat kesukaran instrumen, dan deteksi bias berdasarkan jenis kelamin (DIF). Sampel diperoleh melalui rumus Taro Yamane atau Slovin sebanyak 137 siswa dari salah satu SMA di Sragen. Analisis data menggunakan analisis model Rasch dengan Winstep versi 3.73. Reliabilitas instrumen menunjukkan angka logit sebesar 0,98 (sangat baik), validitas instrumen menunjukkan rata-rata outfit MNSQ (Mean Square) sebesar 1,02 dan rata-rata outfit ZSTD (Z-standard) -0,3 (valid). Tingkat kesulitan instrumen 1 soal tergolong mudah, 3 soal tergolong sukar, 11 soal tergolong sangat sulit. Selisih daya instrumen menunjukkan nilai H sebesar 9,56 dibulatkan menjadi 10, sehingga terdapat 10 kelompok instrumen (sangat baik). Nilai rata-rata literasi sains siswa SMA adalah 18,81 dari total skor 37 yang relatif rendah. Persentase aspek konteks, isi, dan kompetensi literasi sains siswa adalah 31,205%, 40,48%, dan 51,02%. Rata-rata persentase tingkat literasi sains total siswa SMA sebesar 50,48% yang tergolong rendah.

 

Analysis of students' scientific literacy level on aspects of context, content, and competence with Rasch Model. This research aims to analyze the level of scientific literacy of high school students in terms of context, content, and viral material competence aspects. The data collection technique used a science literacy test about virus via google form. The science literacy test has been tested for reliability, validity, difference power, difficulty level of the instrument, and bias detection based on gender (DIF). The sample was obtained through the Taro Yamane or Slovin formula as many as 137 students from one of the high schools in Sragen. Data analysis used Rasch model analysis with Winstep version 3.73. Instrument reliability shows a logit number of 0.98 (very good), the validity of the instrument shows the average MNSQ outfit (Mean Square) of 1.02 and the average outfit ZSTD (Z-standard) -0.3 (valid). The difficulty level of the instrument 1 question is classified as easy, 3 questions are classified as difficult, 11 questions are classified as very difficult. The difference power of the instrument shows the H value of 9.56 rounded to 10, so there are 10 groups of instruments (very good). The average score of high school students 'scientific literacy was 18.81 out of a total score of 37relatively low. The percentage aspects of context, content, and students' scientific literacy competencies were 31.205%, 40.48%, and 51.02%. The average percentage of the total science literacy level of high school students is 50.48% which is classified as low.

Kata Kunci

Konten; Konteks; Kompetensi; Rasch; Literasi sains;

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project based learning integrated to stem to enhance elementary school’s students scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5493

Amin, M. (2017). Sadar Berprofesi Guru Sains, Sadar Literasi : Tantangan Guru di Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional III Tahun 2017 “Biologi, Pembelajaran, Dan Lingkungan Hidup Perspektif Interdisipliner,”April, 9–20.

Ardiyanti, D. (2016). Aplikasi Model Rasch pada Pengembangan Skala Efikasi Diri dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Karier Siswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 248–263.

Auerbach, A. J., & Schussler, E. E. (2017). Curriculum alignment with vision and change improves student scientific literacy. CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0160

Aziz, R. (2015). Aplikasi Model Rasch dalam Pengujian Alat Ukur Kesehatan Mental di Tempat Kerja. Jurnal Psikoislamika, 12(1), 1–16.

Bellová, R., Melicherčíková, D., Tomčík, P., Bellová, R., Melicherčíková, D., & Tomčík, P. (2017). Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects in some natural science subjects. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656

Benjamin, T. E., Marks, B., Demetrikopoulos, M. K., Rose, J., Pollard, E., Thomas, A., & Muldrow, L. L. (2017). Development and Validation of Scientific Literacy Scale for College Preparedness in STEM with Freshmen from Diverse Institutions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9710-x

Berndt, M., Schmidt, F. M., Sailer, M., Fischer, F., Fischer, M. R., & Zottmann, J. M. (2021). Investigating statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in medical- , social sciences- , and economics students ☆. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101963

Button, K. (2012). Available online at. 3(10), 32114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.377

Calo, K. M., Sturtevant, E. G., & Kopfman, K. M. (2015). Literacy Coaches’ Perspectives of Themselves as Literacy Leaders: Results From a National Study of K–12 Literacy Coaching and Leadership. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2014.941050

Chambers Cantrell, S., David Burns, L., & Callaway, P. (2009). Middle- and high-school content area teachers’ perceptions about literacy teaching and learning. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802434899

Chih-Yang, C., Shih-Chun, Y., Chia-Sung, Y., & Shun, L. Y. (2012). A survey of science literacy level for senior high school students in Taiwan. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 143, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27966-9_7

Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-Conceptualization of Scientific Literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century. 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424

Darmawan, H., & Nawawi, N. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran interaktif dan lembar kerja siswa pada materi virus. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 5(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i1.573

Devick-Fry, J., & LeSage, T. (2010). Science Literacy Circles: Big Ideas about Science. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 47(2), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368120903383133

Dichev, C., Dicheva, D., Salem, W., Salem, W., Salem, W., & Salem, W. (2017). Towards Data Science Literacy Towards Data Science Literacy Towards Data Science Literacy. Procedia Computer Science, 108, 2151–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.240

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s Science Literacy in The Aspect of Content Science? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7245

Firat, E. A., & Köksal, M. S. (2016). The Relationship between Use of Web 2.0 Tools by Prospective Science Teachers and Their Biotechnology Literacy. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.067

Gurses, A., Gunes, K., Barin, T. B., Eroglu, Z., & Cozel, F. S. (2015). Relation Between Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers ’ Science Literacy Levels And Their Some Scientific Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2395–2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.300

Guzzetti, B. J., & Bang, E. (2011). The influence of literacy-based science instruction on adolescents’ interest, participation, and achievement in science. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070903447774

Hwang, J., Choi, K. M., Bae, Y., & Shin, D. H. (2018). Do Teachers’ Instructional Practices Moderate Equity in Mathematical and Scientific Literacy?: An Investigation of the PISA 2012 and 2015. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1629–1631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9918-7

Jaya, I. (2019). Penerapan Statistik Untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Prenada Media Group.

Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific literacy and science learning achievement at junior high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 630–636. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312

Kalkan, O. K., Altun, A., & Atar, B. (2020). Studies in Educational Evaluation Role of teacher-related factors and educational resources in science literacy : An international perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation Journal, 67, 100935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100935

Kern, D., Bean, R. M., Swan Dagen, A., DeVries, B., Dodge, A., Goatley, V., Ippolito, J., Perkins, J. H., & Walker-Dalhouse, D. (2018). Preparing reading/literacy specialists to meet changes and challenges: International Literacy Association’s Standards 2017. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(3), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2018.1453899

Li, L., Liu, Y., Peng, Z., Liao, M., Lu, L., Liao, H., & Li, H. (2020). Children and Youth Services Review Peer relationships , motivation , self-efficacy , and science literacy in ethnic minority adolescents in China : A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105524

Mokshein, S. E., Ishak, H., & Ahmad, H. (2019). The use of rasch measurement model in English testing. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.22750

Nixon, S. B., Saunders, G. L., & Fishback, J. E. (2012). Implementing an Instructional Framework and Content Literacy Strategies Into Middle and High School Science Classes. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(4), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2012.707293

Nofiana, M. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP di Kota Purwokerto Ditinjau dari Aspek Konten, Proses, dan Konteks Sains. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 1(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v1i2.1682

Nurgiyantoro, B., Lestyarini, B., & Rahayu, D. H. (2020). Mapping junior high school students’ functional literacy competence. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.34061

Odegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S., & Sorvik, G. O. (2015). Budding Science and Literacy. A Classroom Video Study of the Challenges and Support in an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Teaching Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167(1877), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.674

OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publising.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2015). PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework. OECD Publications.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2019). Country Note Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018 (online).

Osman, E., BouJaoude, S., & Hamdan, H. (2017). An Investigation of Lebanese G7-12 Students’ Misconceptions and Difficulties in Genetics and Their Genetics Literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(7), 1257–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9743-9

Pratiwi, I. (2019). Efek Program PISA Terhadap Kurikulum di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1157

Putri, R. M. M., & Wasis. (2016). Penerapan Pembelajaran Model Guided Discovery Untuk Melatihkan Literasi Sains Rhinjani Mutyara Mega Putri , Wasis Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika ( JIPF ) ISSN : 2302-4496 Rhinjani Mutyara Mega P. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 05(03), 249–254.

Ratini, Muchtar, H., Suparman, M. A., Tamuri, A. H., & Susanto, E. (2018). The Influence of Learning Models and Learning Reliance on Students’ Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.12489

Ristina, H., Linuwih, S., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). SETS Learning Efficacy to Improve Students Science Literacy Skills. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v0i0.27905

Rusilowati, A., Kurniawati, L., Nugroho, S. E., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2016). Developing an instrument of scientific literacy asessment on the cycle theme. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5718–5727.

Rusydiyah, E. F., Purwati, E., & Prabowo, A. (2020). How to use digital literacy as a learning resource for teacher candidates in Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.30551

Sarwi, Alim, Fathonah, S., & Subali, B. (2020). The analysis of ethnoscience-based science literacy and character development using guided inquiry model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022045

Shaffer, J. F., Ferguson, J., & Denaro, K. (2019). Use of the test of scientific literacy skills reveals that fundamental literacy is an important contributor to scientific literacy. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238

She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and Mathematics Literacy: PISA for Better School Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1

She, H., Lin, H., & Huang, L.-Y. (2019). Reflections on and implications of the programme for international student assessment 2015 performance of students in Taiwan : The role of epistemic beliefs about science in scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21553

Srirahayu, R. R. Y., & Arty, I. S. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran Fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.20270

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial (B. Trim (ed.)). Trim Komunikata.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.

Syamsidar. (2015). Dampak Perubahan Sosial Budaya Terhadap Pendidikan. Jurnal Bimbingan Penyuluhan Islam, 2(1), 83–92.

Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018. Paper of Matematohir, 2(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/pcjvx

Treacy, D. J., & Kosinski-collins, M. S. (2011). Using the Writing and Revising of Journal Articles to Increase ology Laboratory Course. Atlas Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.5147/ajse/2011/0032

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2010). 21St Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Choice Reviews Online, 47(10), 47-5788-47–5788. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-5788

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21 st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Wibisono, S. (2018). Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Validasi Instrumen Pengukuran Fundamentalisme Agama Bagi Responden Muslim. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v5i1.9239

Wulandari, N., & Wulandari, N. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Aspek Pengetahuan Dan Kompetensi Sains Siswa Smp Pada Materi Kalor. Edusains, 8(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1762

Yarden, A., Brill, G., & Falk, H. (2001). Primary literature as a basis for a high-school biology curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2001.9655776

Yasin, S. N. T. M., Yunus, M. F. M., & Ismail, I. (2018). The use of rasch measurement model for the validity and reliability. Journal of Counseling and Educational Technology, 1(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.32698/0111

Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336973

You, H. S., Park, S., & Delgado, C. (2020). A closer look at US schools : What characteristics are associated with scientific literacy ? A multivariate multilevel analysis using PISA 2015. Science Education, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21609

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v10i1.51648

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.