Guided Discovery Learning With Concept Hierarki, Can Improve Critical Thinking Ability and Student Learning Achievements

Putri Alvy Assa'adah, Ashadi Ashadi, Sri Mulyani

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve the critical thinking skill and students’ learning achievement of X grade MIPA 1 in the material of redox reaction in one of senior high school of Surakarta through the application of Guided Discovery learning models that assisted by concept of hierarchy. The type of this research was Classroom Action Research (CAR). Subjects of this research were X grade MIPA 1. The technique of collecting data were taken by observation, interviews, document, questionnaires, and tests. The data validity of this research was tested by using triangulation technique. The result of this research showed that guided discovery learning model was assisted by concept of hierarchy could improved critical thinking skill (65.63% in the first cycle to 100% in the second cycle) and students’ learning achievement (on knowledge aspect was 43.75% in the first cycle to 90.63% in the second cycle) in the material of redox reaction. While the aspect of attitude showed that there was improvement of percentage from 90.63% in the first cycle to 100% in the second cycle. Percentage of skill aspect was 100% in the first cycle.

Keywords

Guided discovery, concept hierarchy, critical thinking ability,

Full Text:

PDF

References

Mulyasa, E. 2015. Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Johnson, E.B. 2007. Contextual Teaching and Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar - Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama.

Oktaviana, I. A, Saputro, A. N. C.and Utami, B. 2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 143–152.

Schanz, D. B. 2010. LSU Doctoral Dissertations, , p. 5.

Santrock, J. W. 2011. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Gluck, L. Gilmore, M. W. and Dillihunt, M. 2015. Mod. Chem. Appl., vol. 3, no. 3.

Sanjaya, W. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Swaak, J., De Jong, T., and Van Joolingen, W. R. 2004. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 225–234.

Akinbobola, A. O. and Afolabi, F. 2009. Bulg. J. Sci. Educ. Policy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 233–252.

Haris, F., Rinanto,Y., dan Fatmawati, U. 2015. Jurnal Pendidik Biologi, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 114–122.

Novak, J. D. and Gowin, D. B. 1984. Learning How to Learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ishartono, B., Ashadi, and Susilowati,E. 2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia (JPK). vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10–19.

Rahayu, S., Widodo, A. T. dan Supartono. 2010. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, vol. 4, no. 1.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, 5th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprihatiningrum. 2013. Strategi Pembelajaran. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Dahar, R.W. 2011. Teori - Teori Belajar & Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Gelora Aksara Pratama.

Suyono and Hariyanto. 2015 Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Konsep Dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Windarti, Tjandrakirana, and Widodo. 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 274–281.

Karim, A. 2011. Jurnal Penelitian. Pendidik, no. 1, pp. 154–163.

Slameto. 2013. Belajar dan Faktor - faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Novita, S. and Anggo, M. 2016. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. Matematika, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 127–140.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.