Indonesian Students' Computational Thinking Performance Based on Level and Gender

Yuni Fitriyah, Wahyudin Wahyudin, Hanifah Nurhayati, Tri Sedya Febrianti

Abstract


Computational thinking (CT) has become an essential competency for students in the 21st century. This study examines the CT proficiency of Indonesian students using data from the Bebras Challenge 2023, an international competition designed to evaluate students' CT skills. The research employs a quantitative ex post facto approach, including a sample of 3,648 students from elementary, junior high, and senior high schools in Indonesia who participated in the Bebras Challenge 2023 and achieved a minimum score of 50. The primary data source for this study is secondary, derived from the Bebras Challenge 2023 test results obtained legally from the official website bebras.or.id, adhering strictly to ethical guidelines regarding participant anonymity. Data analysis techniques include using SPSS 23 software and applying descriptive and inferential statistical methods, specifically the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests, to examine average score discrepancies across different groups. The findings indicate that CT skills among Indonesian students are significantly underdeveloped, with 87% of participants scoring below the minimum threshold of 50. The average scores of those who exceeded the threshold were around 56.25, indicating room for improvement. Significant disparities in CT abilities were observed among student groups categorized as Siaga, Penggalang, and Penegak, with varying proficiency levels. Additionally, gender-based differences were noted, with male students demonstrating superior CT abilities compared to female students. The study emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts among educators, policymakers, and communities to enhance CT education in Indonesia, advocating for integrated CT curricula, targeted educator training programs, and inclusive learning environments that foster CT skills across all student demographics.

Keywords


computational thinking; students’ performance; bebras challenge

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Aithal, P. S. (2019). Information communication and computation technology (ICCT) as a strategic tool for industry sectors. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 3(2), 65-80. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3497777

Amin, N. F., Garancang, S., & Abunawas, K. (2023). Konsep umum populasi dan sampel dalam penelitian. Pilar, 14(1), 15-31. Retrieved from https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/pilar/article/view/10624

Angevine, C., Cator, K., Roschelle, J., Thomas, S. A., Waite, C., & Weisgrau, J. (2017). Computational thinking for a computational world. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12265/62

Ansori, M. (2020). Pemikiran komputasi (computational thinking) dalam pemecahan masalah. Dirasah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.29062/dirasah.v3i1.119

Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008

Bati, K. (2022). A systematic literature review regarding computational thinking and programming in early childhood education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2059-2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2

Chiazzese, G., Arrigo, M., Chifari, A., Lonati, V., & Tosto, C. (2019, October). Educational robotics in primary school: Measuring the development of computational thinking skills with the bebras tasks. In Informatics (Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 43). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6040043

Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of computers in education, 4, 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9

Duffy, J., Gunther, G., & Walters, L. (1997). Gender and mathematical problem solving. Sex roles, 37, 477-494. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025602818005

Fitriyah, Y., Dahlan, J. A., & Wahyudin (2023). Teaching Computational Thinking in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of International Conference on Studies in Engineering, Science, and Technology (pp. 51-67).

Giuffre, M. (1997). Designing research: Ex post facto designs. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 12(3), 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1089-9472(97)80038-X

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Gunawan, Y., Putra, Z. H., Antosa, Z., Dahnilsyah, & Tjoe, H. (2023). The Effect of Gender on Fifth-Grade Students’ Computational Thinking Skills . Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i3.820

Hyde, J. S. (2016). Sex and cognition: gender and cognitive functions. Current opinion in neurobiology, 38, 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.02.007

Izu, C., Mirolo, C., Settle, A., Mannila, L., & Stupuriene, G. (2017). Exploring bebras tasks content and performance: a multinational study. Informatics in Education, 16(1), 39-59. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=525449

Izzah, N. A., Suwaibatulilla, A., Khasfiyatin, S., Jayati, R. T., & Supeno, S. (2023). Profil Computational Thinking Skill Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Paedagogy, 10(4), 1218-1225. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v10i4.9193

Juškevičienė, A., Stupurienė, G., & Jevsikova, T. (2021). Computational thinking development through physical computing activities in STEAM education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22365

Kanaki, K., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Assessing algorithmic thinking skills in relation to age in early childhood STEM education. Education Sciences, 12(6), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060380

Kang, E. H., Seong, Y. O., & Seo, Y. G. (2019). A Study on the Effect of Bebras Challenge to Raise CT. 디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 20(10), 1961-1968. http://dx.doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.10.1961

Kartarina, K. (2022). Evaluasi Pelatihan Computational Thinking Kepada Guru Pada Program Gerakan Pandai Oleh Bebras Indonesia Biro Universitas Bumigora. TRIDARMA: Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (PkM), 5(1), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.35335/abdimas.v5i1.2752

Kong, S. C. (2016). A framework of curriculum design for computational thinking development in K-12 education. Journal of Computers in Education, 3, 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0076-z

Korucu, A. T., Gencturk, A. T., & Gundogdu, M. M. (2017). Examination of the computational thinking skills of students. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 2(1), 11-19. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/joltida/issue/55466/760079

Lee, J., Joswick, C., & Pole, K. (2023). Classroom play and activities to support computational thinking development in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(3), 457-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01319-0

Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2018). Developing a computational thinking test using Bebras problems. In: CC-TEL 2018 and TACKLE 2018 Workshops, 3 September 2018, Leeds. Retrieved from https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/10316/

Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?. Computers in human behavior, 41, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012

Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2018). Case studies of elementary children’s engagement in computational thinking through scratch programming. Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines: Foundations and Research Highlights, 227-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_12

Maharani, A. (2020). Computational thinking dalam pembelajaran matematika menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Euclid, 7(2), 86-96. https://dx.doi.org/10.33603/e.v7i2.3364

Mahdum, M., Hadriana, H., & Safriyanti, M. (2019). Exploring teacher perceptions and motivations to ict use in learning activities in Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18. https://doi.org/10.28945/4366

Natali, V., & Nugraheni, C. E. (2023). Indonesian Bebras Challenge 2021 ExploratoryData Analysis. Olympiads in Informatics, 17, 65-85. https://doi.rog/10.15388/ioi.2023.06

Nuvitalia, D., Saptaningrum, E., Ristanto, S., & Putri, M. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional (Computational Thinking) Siswa SMP Negeri Se-Kota Semarang Tahun 2022. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 13(2), 211 - 218. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v13i2.12794

OECD. (2019). OECD Skills Outlook 2019 Thriving in a Digital World. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e11c1c2d-en

Palts, T., & Pedaste, M. (2020). A model for developing computational thinking skills. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 113-128. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=840782

Pérez-Escoda, A., & Fernández-Villavicencio, N. G. (2016, November). Digital competence in use: From DigComp 1 to DigComp 2. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 619-624). https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012583

Pertiwi, A., Syukur, A., Suhartini, T., & Affandy, A. (2020). Konsep informatika dan computational thinking di dalam kurikulum sekolah dasar, menengah, dan atas. Abdimasku: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(3), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.33633/ja.v3i3.53

Rahman, A. A. (2022). Integrasi Computational Thinking dalam Model EDP-STEM untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2), 575-590. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i2.409

Rijke, W. J., Bollen, L., Eysink, T. H., & Tolboom, J. L. (2018). Computational thinking in primary school: An examination of abstraction and decomposition in different age groups. Informatics in education, 17(1), 77-92. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=645612

Sart, G., & Yildiz, O. (2022). Digitalism and Jobs of the Future. In Digital Transformation and Internationalization Strategies in Organizations (pp. 1-20). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8169-8.ch001

Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational research review, 22, 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003

Singh, H., Nolte, H., & Becattini, N. (2021, September). Pedagogical Approaches and Course Modality Affecting Students’ Self-efficacy and Problem-Solving Attitudes in a TRIZ-Oriented Course. In International TRIZ Future Conference (pp. 367-378). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86614-3_29




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v8i1.89464

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Yuni Fitriyah, Wahyudin Wahyudin, Hanifah Nurhayati, Tri Sedya Febrianti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

miya4d

Toto Togel

erek erek

levis4d

javtogel

slot

https://micromaterialsresearch.com/

https://tvwesal.com/

toto slot

AMARTOTO

slot

paitogel

ceri123

slot

spaceman slot

Slot777

Situs Slot Gacor

miya4d

slot longhoki

MOM4D

omtogel

toto slot

paitogel

  

International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education

Print ISSN: 2597-7792
Online ISSN: 2549-8525
Website: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijpte/index
Email: ijpte@mail.uns.ac.id
Published by: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Ir. Sutami Street, No. 36A, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah Indonesia

toto togel

slot gacor

freya kehilangan akal saat mahjong ways 2 tembus rp 4.200.000

nongkrong sambil main mahjong ways 2 gilang malah dapat scatter hitam

freespin beruntun di mahjong ways 2 bikin laras bengong

akhirnya menang saat hampir nyerah mahjong ways 2 versi dino

kejutan tengah malam dari mahjong ways 2 untuk tari

scatter mahjong ways muncul 3x saat zaki sedang ngopi

maen mahjong ways 2 abis bersihin kosan deo malah bawa pulang rp 7.800.000

maia buka mahjong ways 2 sebelum tidur langsung dapat keberuntungan

sandi cuma iseng main eh rp 13.000.000 masuk dari mahjong ways 2

tanpa disangka dira dapat freespin di mahjong ways saat nunggu ojek

perjuangan rey dari modal tipis sampai tembus rp 2.500.000 di mahjong ways 2

scatter ganda di mahjong ways 2 bikin vano gagal tidur

tiara curhat menang mahjong ways 2 sambil nangis

keajaiban muncul waktu vivi coba mahjong ways 2 pakai koin terakhir

tanpa niat main mahjong ways 2 bisa bikin niko tiba tiba happy

grace menang mahjong ways 2 waktu bosen nunggu rapat online

scatter hitam di mahjong ways 2 bikin nando cuma bisa diem

syifa main mahjong ways 2 sambil masak sayur eh rp 6.300.000 masuk

aldo bingung sendiri liat freespin mahjong ways 2 muncul 4x beruntun

maen bentar aja udah menang rp 11.200.000 dari mahjong ways 2 kata jo

tiba tiba menang 13 juta waktu rendi main mahjong ways 2

zidan nggak nyangka mahjong ways 2 bisa bikin saldo meledak

main mahjong way sambil nunggu hujan reda dan dapat kejutan

pengalaman hana dapat 8.200.000 saat ngabuburit mahjong way

mahjong way jadi pelarian laras dari drama keluarga

uang makan bulan ini datang dari mahjong ways 2 cerita irfan

iseng coba mahjong way ternyata bisa bikin senyum farhan

cerita fahrul bangun pagi cuma buat main mahjong ways 2

rissa main mahjong ways 2 karena bosan eh malah ketagihan

kaget liat freespin datang berturut turut di mahjong ways 2

nova nggak percaya saldo nambah pasca main mahjong ways 2

uang kaget dari mahjong way bikin rafi ajak nongkrong teman

andi main mahjong ways 2 sebelum berangkat kerja dan menang

dari bosen di kelas online jadi cuan di mahjong way

sabtu malam di kamar kecil rizka dan 12 juta dari mahjong ways 2

vera cuma pengen coba coba tapi mahjong ways 2 ngasih banyak

menang tanpa target mahjong ways 2 buat akbar bingung sendiri

dari kepo liat temen main mahjong way felix ikut menang

paul diem diem main mahjong ways 2 dan bawa pulang 13 juta

dari cuma 20 ribu main mahjong ways 2 bisa jadi rp 5.200.000

tokowin99

titan777

988slot

988bet