The dropout rate is higher at advanced educational levels. The Indonesian government seeks to ensure inclusive and equitable education by providing educational support to children, particularly those from low-income families in households and schools. The study analyzes the Smart Indonesia Program's (PIP) effectiveness in providing educational assistance to poor or vulnerable households. Due to budget constraints, it is crucial to target aid accurately; however, government-defined poverty criteria can lead to errors in both inclusion and exclusion in the distribution of social assistance. The data for this study were derived from the household surveys conducted in the National Socio-Economic Survey (Susenas) in Indonesia in March 2021. This research focused on sample households in Bogor Regency, West Java Province, and Nunukan Regency, North Kalimantan Province. The data were analyzed using Binary Logistic Regression to identify the factors influencing the receipt of the PIP. The regression analysis was performed using STATA 17.0. The findings indicate that identity ownership, status as a Family Hope Program (PKH) beneficiary, Family Welfare Card program (KKS) participation, and geographical region significantly impact the likelihood of receiving assistance. Households receiving the PKH had a 5.32 times higher probability of receiving the PIP assistance than those that did not. These findings align with the primary eligibility criteria of the PIP, which provides supplementary educational assistance to families enrolled in the PKH. Therefore, the results suggest that the targeting and distribution of the PIP assistance were significantly influenced by identity ownership status rather than the household characteristics traditionally used to define poverty and distributing aid.

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Tobias, J. (2012). Targeting the poor: Evidence from A Field Experiment in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1206–1240. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1206

Amroni, M. A., Alhadihaq, M. Y., & Sumiati, N. (2023). Efektivitas bantuan program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) terhadap motivasi peserta didik di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 40 Kota Bandung. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 12(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.35906/equili.v12i2.1521

Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2019). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. In Poverty, social exclusion and stochastic dominance (pp. 83–107). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3432-0_7

Coady, D., Grosh, M., & Hoddinott, J. (2002). The targeting of transfers in developing countries: Review of experience and lessons. Social Safety Net Primer Series, World Bank, Washington DC.

Corrêa, J. P., de Toledo Vieira, M., da Silva Freguglia, R., & Betarelli Junior, A. A. (2022). Focus on cash transfer programs: Assessing the eligibility of the Bolsa Família Program in Brazil. Quality and Quantity, 57, 1247–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01413-w

Devereux, S., Masset, E., Sabates-Wheeler, R., Samson, M., Rivas, A. M., & Te Lintelo, D. (2017). The targeting effectiveness of social transfers. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(2), 162–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2017.1305981

Diana, R. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi siswa putus sekolah di Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 14(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v14i2.497

Ferguson, T., & Roofe, C. G. (2020). SDG 4 in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 959–975. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2019-0353

Fortin, S., Kameli, Y., Ouattara, A., Castan, F., Perenze, M. L., Kankouan, J., Traore, A., Kouanda, S., Conte, A., & Martin-Prével, Y. (2016). Targeting Vulnerable Households in Urban Burkina Faso: Effectiveness of Geographical Criteria But Not of Proxy-Means Testing. Health Policy and Planning, 31(5), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czv104

Ghatak, M. (2023). Direct transfer policies for people with low incomes. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00306-4

Grosh, M., del Ninno, C., Tesliuc, E., & Ouerghi, A. (2008). For Protection and Promotion: The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets. The World Bank.

Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hafrienda, R., Candradewini, C., & Munajat, M. D. E. (2023). Efektivitas program Indonesia Pintar pada jenjang SMA Negeri di Kota Bukittinggi. JANE - Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 14(2), 697–706. https://doi.org/10.24198/jane.v14i2.45140

Hasanah, Y. M., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2017). Evaluasi program wajib belajar 12 tahun pemerintah daerah Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.21831/amp.v5i2.8546

Kousar, S., Ahmed, F., Afzal, M., & Segovia, J. E. T. (2023). Is Government Spending in The Rducation and Health Sector Necessary for Human Capital Development?. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01514-3

Mishra, A. K., & Kar, A. (2015). Are targeted unconditional cash transfers effective? Evidence from a poor region in India. Social Indicators Research, 130(2), 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1187-z

Mulyani, F., Ridwan, E., & Nazer, M. (2023). Efektivitas program Indonesia Pintar terhadap partisipasi sekolah di kawasan barat dan timur Indonesia. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 5(4), 1328–1332. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i4.652

OECD (2012), Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en.

Perdana, N. S. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap aksesibilitas memperoleh pendidikan untuk anak-anak di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 21(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v21i3.191

Premand, P., & Schnitzer, P. (2021). Efficiency, legitimacy, and impacts of targeting methods: Evidence from an experiment in Niger. The World Bank Economic Review, 35(4), 892–920. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber

Pruce, K. (2023). The politics of who gets what and why: Learning from the targeting of social cash transfers in Zambia. European Journal of Development Research, 35(4), 820–839. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00540-2

Sabates-Wheeler, R., Hurrell, A., & Devereux, S. (2015). Targeting social transfer programmes: Comparing design and implementation errors across alternative mechanisms. Journal of International Development, 27, 1521–1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid

Salifu, A., & Kufoalor, K. M. (2024). Are cash transfer programmes effective at targeting people experiencing poverty in sub-Saharan Africa? SN Business & Economics, 4(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00620-3

Seleka, T. B., & Lekobane, K. R. (2020). Targeting effectiveness of social transfer programs in Botswana: Means-tested versus categorical and self-selected instruments. Social Development Issues, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/sdi.17872073.0042.103

Slater, R., Farrington, J., Holmes, R., & Harvey, P. (2009). Social protection, rural livelihoods and economic growth: the case of cash transfers in Malawi, Ethiopia and Bangladesh. Building Decent Societies: Rethinking the Role of Social Security in Development, 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230251052_14

Kusumawati, A.S (2019). The effectiveness of targeting social transfer programs in Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, III(3). https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v3i3.83

Sulistyaningrum, E. (2016). Impact Evaluation of the School Operational Assistance Program (BOS) Using the Matching Method. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 31(1), 33–62. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.10319

Susilo, H., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2020). Keeping rural children’s hope to stay in the senior high school through conditional cash transfer: An Indonesian case. Sebelas Maret Business Review, 5(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.20961/smbr.v5i1.41197

Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. (2015). Menjangkau Masyarakat Miskin dan Rentan serta Mengurangi Kesenjangan: Memperbaiki Ketepatan Sasaran, Desain, dan Mekanisme Program. Jakarta: Kementerian Sekretariat Negara RI.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2012). Economic development (11th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Vadivel, B., Alam, S., Nikpoo, I., & Ajanil, B. (2023). The impact of low socioeconomic background on a child’s educational achievements. Education Research International, 2023(1), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6565088

Zamjani, I. (2019a). Inklusivitas Program Indonesia Pintar: Studi Kasus Pelaksanaannya Bagi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus di Lima Daerah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 15–32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1095

Zamjani, I. (2019b). The Implementation of Smart Indonesia Program for The Recipients of Conventional Smart Indonesia Card: The Study in Four Districts of President’s Working Visits In 2017. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 11(2), 64–82. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v11i2.225

Zulkhibri, M. (2016). The Relevance of Conditional Cash Transfers in Developing Economy: The Case of Muslim Countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(12), 1513–1538. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-06-2014-0116