Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs

Khalif Ashhabul Umam; Iip Saripah

doi:10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086

Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs

Khalif Ashhabul Umam, Iip Saripah

Abstract

Evaluation of training program is made to establish the achievement of program objectives and to provide recommendations for program improvements. In this article, use of the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) evaluation model in training programs is discussed. It is an evaluation research, with a descriptive quantitative approach involving 16 training program participants as research subjects. The data collection techniques were based on questionnaires as the main instrument, with interview guides and observation guidelines as supporting instruments. The data analysis was made by comparing the scores obtained with the ideal score and multiplying by 100%; the results of these calculations were then grouped into a number of criteria that had been established. The results of the study indicate that the context dimension consisting of training objectives, training needs assessment, and state agency program organizers obtained a PE (Percentage of Effectiveness) score of 75.04%, placing it in the "fair" criterion. In the input dimension, consisting of participant description , instructor condition, infrastructure, training curriculum and instructional media, the PE score was 79.44% again in the "fair" criterion. In the process dimension, comprising lecture method, discussion method, demonstration method, question and answer method, practice method, field visiting method and evaluation of learning outcomes, the PE score obtained was 78.75%, which was also in the "fair" criterion. Finally, in the product dimension of knowledge aspect, attitude aspect and skill aspect, the PE score was 82.29%, in the “good" criterion. Based on the results of the dimension evaluation, the total PE score obtained was 78.88%, or overall in the "fair" criterion. It can be concluded that in general the execution of this training program was successful, so it is recommended that similar programs be conducted again, with some improvements.

Keywords

CIPP model; Evaluation of Training Programs

Full Text:

PDF

rticle

References

Akbar, S. (2011). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Alvarez, K., Salas, E., & Garofano, C. M. (2004). An Integrated Model of Training Evaluation and Effectiveness. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 385-416. doi: 10.1177/1534484304270820.

Barbazette, J. (2006). Training Needs Assessment: Method, Tools, and Techniques. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Fitri, R (2016). Pengaruh Pelatihan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Pt. BNI Syariah Cabang Utama Kota Pekanbaru. JOM FISIP, 3(2): 1-9.

Gulo, W. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Hamalik, O. (2001). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hasibuan, S.P.M. (2011). Manajemen Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah. Jakarta: CV. Haji Masagung.

Khalid, M.M., Chaudhry, A. R., & Muhammad, A. (2012). Exploring The Link Between Kirkpatrick (KP) and Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Training Evaluation Models, and its Effect on Training Evaluation in Public Organizations of Pakistan. Journal of Business Management, 6(1): 274-279.

Kuo, L.H., C. Ray Diez, Shi, J. L., Hua, L. T., & Tien, S. T. (2010). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product Model To Assess An Engineering Curriculum. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8(3), 256-261.

Kuo, L.H., Huei, M.W., Li, M. C., Ming, C. W., Miao, K.H., & Hung, J.Y. (2012). An Evaluation Model of Integrating Emerging Technology into Formal Curriculum. International. Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 6(3), 250-259.

Mudayen, Y.M.V., & Lantum, A.K. (2008). Needs Assessment Pelatihan Pengembangan SDM Pendukung Pariwisata Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pendidikan, 5(1): 1-17.

Notoatmodjo, S. (2003). Pendidikan Dan Perilaku Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Regulation of the Minister of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2015 on Organization and Working Procedures of Technical Implementation Unit of the Field of Work Training.

Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia number 8 of 2014 on Guidelines for the Implementation of Competency Based Training.

Rifa’i, A. (2007). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Semarang: UNNES Press.

Sanjaya, W. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The use of experimental design in educational evaluation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8(4), 267-274.

Sudjana, D. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sundoyo, H., T. Sumaryanto, & Dwijanto. (2012). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Sistem Ganda Berdasarkan Stake Countenance Model. Innovative Journal of Curriculum, 1(2), 69-73.

Suprijanto. (2008). Pendidikan Orang Dewasa “Dari Teori Hingga Aplikasi”. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Sutikno, M. S. (2014). Metode Dan Model-Model Pembelajaran. Lombok: Holistica.

Tokmak, H.S., Baturay, H. M., & Fadde, P. (2013). Applying the Context, Input, Process, Product Evaluation Model for Evaluation, Research, and Redesign of an Online Master’s Program. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 273-293. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1485.

Topno, H. (2012). Evaluation of Training and Development: An Analysis of Various Models. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 5(2), 16-22.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2016). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zhang, G., Nancy, Z., Robin, G., Debbie, M., Jennifer, W., Christine, S., & Katherine, M. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-83.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education

Print ISSN: 2597-7792
Online ISSN: 2549-8525
Website: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijpte/index
Email: ijpte@mail.uns.ac.id
Published by: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Ir. Sutami Street, No. 36A, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah Indonesia

Username
Password
Remember me