2.png)
Differences in Pedagogical Competence of Shadows Teachers in Terms of Academic Qualification in Inclusive Elementary Schools in Surakarta City
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in shadow teachers’ pedagogical competence in terms of academic qualification. This research method used is comparative quantitative. The research involved two groups: the special education graduate group and the non-Special Education graduate group. The subjects of this study were 15 Shadow teachers with Special Education graduates and 23 Shadow Teachers with non-Special Education graduates spread across 19 elementary schools, including the city of Surakarta.Data collection techniques using the saturated sample method. The instrument used is a pedagogic competency scale with a reliability value of 0.905. In the shadow teacher group with Special Education graduates, 14 respondents were in the very high category, and 1 respondent was in the high category, with the highest score being 179 points and the lowest score being 136 points. Whereas in the shadow teacher group with non-Special Education graduates, 13 respondents were in the high category, and 10 respondents were in the high category, with the highest score of 170 points and the lowest score of 130 points. The analysis in this study used the Man Whitney-U test. The Mann-Whitney-U test shows the value Ucount = 0.220, which is UCount>U table (Utabel = 0.05). Research results conclude that there is no significant difference between the pedagogical competence of teachers with special education and non-special education graduates.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Sabatin, I. M. (2020). The Role of Shadow Teacher in Improving Autistic Students Ability in Learning. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(9), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.79.6962
Amka, Utomo, Kusumastuti, D. E., & Thaibah, H. (2018). Kompetensi Guru Pembimbing Khusus dalam Melaksanakan Identifikasi dan Asesmen Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus di Sekolah Penyelenggara Pendidikan Inklusif Kota Banjarmasin. Kompetensi Guru Bimbingan Khusus.
Anggriana, T. M., & Trisani, R. P. (2016). Kompetensi Guru Pendamping Siswa ABK di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Konseling Gusjigang, 2(2).
Azwar, S. (2009). Efek Seleksi Aitem Berdasar Daya Diskriminasi terhadap Reliabilitas Skor Tes. Buletin Psikologi, 17(1), 28–32.
Azwar. (2014). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Pelajar.
Basalamah, M. S., As’ad, A., & Kamidin, M. (2021). The Influence of Leadership and Training on Teacher Compentence Performance. Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 26(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210716.225
Barnawi, & Arifin, M. (2012). Manajemen sarana dan prasarana sekolah. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Djaali. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bumi Aksara.
Direktorat PPK-LK. (2011). Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Inklusif. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Gunarhadi, Sunardi, Andayani, T. R., & Anwar, M. (2016). Pedagogic Mapping of Teacher Competence in Inclusive Schools. Prosidng Icctte Fkip Uns 2015, 1(1), 389–394.
Kurniawati, Y. (2018). Pengaruh Pengalaman Mengajar dan Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah terghadap Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) pada Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri di Kabupaten Bengkulu Selatan. Al-Nizam, 3(1), 46–54.
Rejeki, D. (2019). Identification and Assessment of the Effectiveness of Instruments Children with Special Needs Based Decision Support System (DSS) Disorders in Children with Physical and Motor Disabilities. IJDS Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 6(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2019.006.02.10
Salim, A., & Wiliyanto, D. A. (2017). Analysis of Teachers’ Understanding Level, Needs, and Difficulties in Identifying Children with Special Needs in Inclusive School in Surakarta. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(4), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.6387
Suciu, A. I., & Mata, L. (2011). Pedagogical Competences – The Key to Efficient Education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 411–423.
Sulfemi, W. B. (2015). Kemampuan Pedagogik Guru. Prosiding Seminar Nasional STKIP Muhammadiyah Bogor, 1(4).
Sugiyono. (2020).Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kulaitatif dan Kombinasi.Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tarnoto, N. (2016). Permasalahan-Permasalahan yang Dihadapi Sekolah Penyelenggara Pendidikan Inklusi Pada Tingkat SD. Humanitas, 13, 1.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, 20 (2003)
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Guru dan Dosen,14 (2010)
Yusuf, M., Salim, A., Sugini, Rejeki, D. S., & Subkhan, I. (2018). Pendidikan Inklusif dan Perlindungan Anak.Surakarta:Tiga Serangkai.
Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100
Zakia, D. L. (2015). Guru Pembimbing Khusus: Pilar Pendidikan Inklusi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan. 110-116. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jod.v3i1.76676
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ramizah Ariq Sakinah Irvansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
