TOWARDS AN INCLUSIVE ISLAMIC PARADIGM: RECONSTRUCTION OF DISABILITY IN RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS
Abstract
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the Islamic paradigm on disability and offer a reconstruction of a more inclusive, humanistic, and just religious understanding. This study uses library research with a conceptual-critical approach through an analysis of contemporary Islamic literature, disability studies, and socio-religious ethics. The results show that Islam has a strong ethical foundation through the concepts of karāmah al-insān, al-'adl, sunnatullāh, and maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, which place all humans in equal dignity. However, the stigma against people with disabilities is still reproduced through biased religious interpretations, religious ableism, and social constructions that make normality the primary measure of human worth. This study finds that disability should not be understood as a deviation from nature, but rather as part of the diversity of human abilities (human diversity). Furthermore, exclusion of people with disabilities stems more from social, cultural, and institutional barriers than from Islamic teachings themselves. Based on these findings, this article proposes a reconstruction of the Islamic paradigm on disability through a shift from a deficit approach to a human diversity paradigm, a reinterpretation of religion oriented toward justice and participation, and a strengthening of the maqāṣid al-sharī'ah as an ethical framework for developing more inclusive religious spaces, Islamic education, and digital environments. These findings affirm that disability inclusion is a manifestation of fundamental Islamic values of human dignity, social justice, and mercy for all humanity.
Keywords: Disability, inclusive Islam, human diversity, maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, religious ableism.
Abstrak
Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis paradigma Islam tentang disabilitas serta menawarkan rekonstruksi pemahaman keagamaan yang lebih inklusif, humanis, dan berkeadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kepustakaan (library research) dengan pendekatan konseptual-kritis melalui analisis literatur keislaman kontemporer, disability studies, dan etika sosial-keagamaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Islam memiliki fondasi etik yang kuat melalui konsep karāmah al-insān, al-'adl, sunnatullāh, dan maqāṣid al-sharī'ah yang menempatkan seluruh manusia dalam martabat yang setara. Namun, stigma terhadap penyandang disabilitas masih direproduksi melalui bias tafsir keagamaan, religious ableism, serta konstruksi sosial yang menjadikan normalitas sebagai ukuran utama keberhargaan manusia. Kajian ini menemukan bahwa disabilitas tidak sepatutnya dipahami sebagai penyimpangan dari fitrah, melainkan sebagai bagian dari keberagaman kemampuan manusia (human diversity). Selain itu, eksklusi terhadap penyandang disabilitas lebih banyak bersumber dari hambatan sosial, budaya, dan kelembagaan daripada dari ajaran Islam itu sendiri. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, artikel ini menawarkan rekonstruksi paradigma Islam tentang disabilitas melalui pergeseran dari pendekatan defisit menuju paradigma human diversity, reinterpretasi keagamaan yang berorientasi pada keadilan dan partisipasi, serta penguatan maqāṣid al-sharī'ah sebagai kerangka etik bagi pengembangan ruang keagamaan, pendidikan Islam, dan lingkungan digital yang lebih inklusif. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa inklusi disabilitas merupakan manifestasi nilai-nilai fundamental Islam tentang kemuliaan manusia, keadilan sosial, dan rahmat bagi seluruh manusia.
Kata Kunci: Disabilitas, Islam inklusif, human diversity, maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, religious ableism.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abou El Fadl, K. (2007). The great theft: Wrestling Islam from the extremists (1. HarperCollins paperback ed). HarperOne. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting Inclusion and Equity in Education: Lessons from International Experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587 Al-Aoufi, H., Al-Zyoud, N., & Shahminan, N. (2012). Islam and the cultural conceptualisation of disability. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 17(4), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2011.649565 Ali, A., & Codina, G. (2025). Representations of Disability in Qur’anic Narratives. Journal of Disability & Religion, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2024.2353603 Amenyedzi, S. B. (2024). Disability and Digital Ecclesiology: Towards an Accessible Online Church. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v80i1.9599 Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A Systems Approach. The International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). Baderin, M. A. (2005). International Human Rights and Islamic Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285402.001.0001 Bazna, M. S., & Hatab, T. A. (2005). Disability in the Qur’an: The Islamic Alternative to Defining, Viewing, and Relating to Disability. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, 9(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1300/J095v09n01_02 Billah, M., Gassing, A. Q., Bakry, M., Kurniati, K., Haddade, A. W., Syamsuddin, D., Ahmad, L. O. I., & Harakan, A. (2025). Islamic Law Perspectives and Social Experiences on Stigma toward Disabled People in Indonesia. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, 1479243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1479243 Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245181 Castells, M. (2009). The Rise of the Network Society (1st edn). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514 Centre for Excellence in Universal Design. (2026). The 7 Principles. https://universaldesign.ie/about-universal-design/the-7-principles/ Charitsis, V., & Lehtiniemi, T. (2023). Data Ableism: Ability Expectations and Marginalization in Automated Societies. Television & New Media, 24(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221077660 Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2015). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice (Fourth edition). Elsevier/Mosby. Creamer, D. B. (2008). Disability and Christian Theology: Embodied Limits and Constructive Possibilities (1st edn). Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195369151.001.0001 Davis, L. (2014). The End of Normal: Identity in a Biocultural Era. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.5608008 Emon, A. M. (2010). Islamic natural law theories. Oxford University Press. Esack, F. (1997). Qur’an, Liberation & Pluralism: An Islamic Perspective of Interreligious Solidarity Against Oppression. Oneworld Publications. Fikri, A. (2016). Konseptualisasi dan Internalisasi Nilai Profetik: Upaya Membangun Demokrasi Inklusif bagi Kaum Difabel di Indonesia. INKLUSI, 3(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.030107 Finkelstein, V. (1979, September 5). Attitudes and Disabled People: Issues for Discussion. World Rehabilitation Fund, Inc. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/finkelstein-attitudes.pdf Freire, P. & Donaldo Macedo. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.; 30th anniversary edition). Continuum. Garland-Thomson, R. (2011). Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept. Hypatia, 26(3), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01206.x Ghaly, M. (2019). The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Islamic Tradition: The question of legal capacity in focus. Journal of Disability & Religion, 23(3), 251–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2019.1613943 Ghaly, M. M. (2008). Physical and Spiritual Treatment of Disability in Islam: Perspectives of Early and Modern Jurists. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, 12(2), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228960802160647 Goggin, G., Ellis, K., & Hawkins, W. (2019). Disability at the centre of digital inclusion: Assessing a new moment in technology and rights. Communication Research and Practice, 5(3), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1641061 Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability Studies (0 edn). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203366974 Goodley, D. (2017). Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction (2nd edition). SAGE. Hallaq, W. B. (2013). The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity’s Moral Predicament. Columbia University Press. Hehir, T. (2002). Eliminating Ableism in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 72(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.1.03866528702g2105 Helmi, Z. (2018). Konsep Khalifah fil Ardhi dalam Perspektif Filsafat: Kajian Eksistensi Manusai sebagai Khalifah. Intizar, 24(1). http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/intizar Hendren, S. (2020). What Can a Body Do? How We Meet the Built World. Riverhead Books. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. Routledge. Ilyas, R. (2016). Manusia sebagai Khalifah dalam Perspektif Islam. Mawa`izh, 1(7). Kamali, M. H. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah Made Simple. International Institute of Islamic Thought. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67vz Khaled, A. E. F. (2001). Speaking in God’s name: Islamic law, authority and women. Oneworld Publications. Maftuhin, A. (2025). Paradigma Fikih Sosial: Dari Otoritas ke Solidaritas. Penerbit Gading. Mattson, I. (2008). The Story of the Qur’an: Its History and Place in Muslim Life. Wiley-Blackwell. Moosa, E. (2015). Copyright Page. In E. Moosa, What Is a Madrasa? (pp. iii–iv). University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469620138.002.0004 Mubin, Z., & Rozi, M. (2020). Socio-Religiuos Model of Disability: Sebuah Rancangan Awal. Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 4(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v4i2.1106 Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things (Revised and expanded ed). Basic Books. Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1 Qurtubi, A. N., Mei Arina Ilmi AS, & Hirman Panggabean. (2025). Analisis Karamah Insaniyah Dalam Q.S Al-Isra’ dan Relevansinya terhadap Kehidupan Kontemporer. Amsal Al-Qur’an: Jurnal Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 2(2). https://Ejournal.yayasanbhz.org/index.php/Amsal Rahman, F. (1982). Islam & Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. The University of Chicago Press. Ramadan, T. (2009). Radical Reform: Islamic Ethics and Liberation. Oxford University Press. Ro’fah. (2015). Teori Disabilitas: Sebuah Review Literatur. SIGAB: Jurnal Difabel, 2(2). Sachedina, A. (2009). Islam and the Challenge of Human Rights. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388428.001.0001 Saeed, A. (2008). The Qur’an (0 edn). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938454 Şentürk, R. (2011). Unity in multiplexity: Islam as an open civilization. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2667269 Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited (0 edn). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887456 Shew, A. (2024). Against technoableism: Rethinking who needs improvement (Norton paperback). W. W. Norton & Company. Stiker, H.-J. (2019). A History of Disability. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11575987 Story, M. F., James L. Mueller, & Ronald L. Mace. (1998). THE UNIVERSAL DESIGN FILE DESIGNING FOR PEOPLE OF ALL AGES & ABILITIES. NC State University, The Center for Universal Design. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED460554.pdf United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and Woman: Rereading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective. Oxford University Press. World Health Organization & World Bank (Eds). (2011). World Report on Disability. WHO. World Wide Web Consortium. (2025). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jod.v6i1.121905
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Barkatullah Amin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|



1.png)





2.png)
