2.png)
4.png){kind=logo}
6.png)
Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan Guided Discovery Learning terhadap Keaktifan Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ngawi Tahun Pelajaran 2013.2014
Abstract
ABSTRACT- The purpose of this research is to know the comparison of problem based learning models with Guided discovery learning to activities of students of X grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Ngawi in academic year 2013/2014. This study was a quasi experimental research. The research design was used post-test only nonequivalent control group design. This research applied problem based learning models and Guided Discovery Learning at experimental group. The population of this research was all of X grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Ngawi in academic year 2013/2014. Sampling techniques used cluster sampling that choosed X MIPA 4 experiment group I and X MIPA 6 as Experiment group II. Techniques of collecting data were test and non-test methods. The test method examination test. The non-test method included observation of activities student and documentation. The hypotheses analyzed by t-test. This research concluded that there are differences activities of student to application of problem based learning and Guided Discovery Learning of grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Ngawi in academic year 2013/2014.
Keywords : activities., problem based learning., Guided discovery learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amir, M. T. (2013). Inovasi pndidikan Melalui Problem Based Learning: Bagaimana Pendidik Memberdayakan Pemelajar Di Era Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, Dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Astuti, R. P., & Junaedi, I. (2013). Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar PBL pada siswa . Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, Volume 42; NO. 2; ISSN 0216-0847.
Beers, S. Z. (2009). 21st Century Skill : Preparing Student for their Future. STEM, 1-6.
Castronova, J. A. (2002). Discovery Learning For the 21st Century: what is it and How Does it Compare to traditionala learning In Effectiveness in the 21st Century? Action Research Exchange.
Colvin, J. (2005). Using PBL to Develop Oral Communication Skills. university of delaware journal, 2, 21-27.
Dahar, R. W. (2006). Teori-teori Belajar . Jakarta: Erlangga.
Darsono, M. (2007). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Semarang: Ikip Semarang.
Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran . Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Duch, B. J., Allen, D. E., & White, H. B. (1999). Problem Based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeed in the 21. Centre for the Advancement of University Teaching, volume 3 No 2.
Hung, I. W., Choi, A. C., & Chan, J. S. (2003). An Integrated Problem-Based Learning Model for Engineering Education. international journal enginerring edition, 19 , 734-737.
Ibrahim, M. (2000). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: UNESA Press.
Ilahi, M. T. (2012). Pembelajaran Discovery Strategy & Mental Vocational Skill. Yogjakarta: Diva Press.
Kay, K. (2010). 21st Century skills: Why they matter, What they are, and How we get there. 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Edited by, James Bellanca, Ron Brandt. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press, xiii-xxxi.
Mulyasa, E. (2005). KurikuluM Berbasis Kompetensi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Narbuko, C., & Achmadi, A. (2002). Metodologi penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nilson, L. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based reource for college instructors (2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
O’Grady, G., & Choy, J. (2008). Assessing to Foster & Measure Deep Learning in Problem Based Learning. The College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 3, 1-15.
Riduwan. (2004). Skala Pengukuran Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Roestiyah. (2008). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Roh, K. H. (2003). Problem-based Learning in Mathematics. Dalam ERIC Digest. ERIC Identifier: EDO-SE-03-07.
Salkind, N. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology. California: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Sardiman, A. M. (2001). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar-Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Gog, T. v., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-Based LearningisCompatible withHuman Cognitive Architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 91-97.
Setyo, A. (2011). Pembelajaran Bermakna Berpendekatan Sets Pada Pelajaran Biologi Untuk Menumbuhkankepedulian Terhadap Lingkungan. Bioma, Volume 1; No. 2.
Slameto. (1995). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suci, N. M. (2008). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Partisipasi Belajar Hasil Belajar Teori Akuntansi Mahasiswa Jurusan Ekonomi Undiksha. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Udiksha, 74-86.
Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sudjana, N., & Ibrahim. (2010). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Swaak, J., Jong, T. d., & Joolingen, W. R. (2004). The effects of discovery learning and expository instruction on the acquisition of definitional and intuitive knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 225-234.
Syah, M. (2006). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Raja Grasindo Prasada.
Tan, O.-s. (2004). Problem-Based Learning innovation : Using Problem to Power Learning in the 21st Century. singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd.
White, H. (2001). Problem-Based Learning. Speaking of Teaching, 11, 1-6.
Wilke, R. R., & Straits, W. J. (2001). The Effects Of Discovery Learning In A Lower-Division Biology Course. Advances In Physiology Education, 25, 62-69.
Yamin, M. (2007). Kiat membelajarkan Siswa. Jakarta: Goung Persada Press dan Center For Learning Innovation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v10i1.8604
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.