2.png)
4.png){kind=logo}
6.png)
Pgaruh Model Pembelajaran Search Solve Create And Share (SSCS) dan Problem Based Instruction (PBI) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar dan Kreativitas Siswa
Abstract
The aims of this study are to find out: (1) the effect of influence between Search Solve Created and Share learning model and the Problem Based Instruction to the achievement of biology, and (2) the influence between the high creativity students and the low creativity students to the achievement of biology. This research was conducted during May-June 2006, using experimental method by taking two groups randomly. The population of the research is all students in grade X in SMA Negeri 1 Karanganyar 2005/2006. The sample is six classes taken randomly by lottery, the control classes are X1, X4 dan X6, and the experimental classes are X2, X3 and X5. The technique of collection data is using test, documentation, questionaire and observation. The data is analyzed using Anava technique. From the analysis it can be concluded that: (1) there was any influence Search Solve Created and Share learning model and the Problem Based Instruction learning model to the achievement of biology, (2) there was any influence between the high students' creativity and the low students' creativity to the achievement of biology.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arends, Richard I. (1997). Classroom Instruction And Management. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill.
Arends, Richard I. (2001). Learning to Teach (Fifth Edition). New York: Mc.Graw-Hill.
Carter, Reece. S. (1997). Comparison of Two Instructional Approaches in Eighth Grade Earth Science. http://education.atu.edu/people/swom-ack/stu/Earth%20Science.htm.25/3/2006
Chang, Chun-yen and James, Barulfadi. P. (1995). The Use of Problem-Solving-Based Instructional Model in Change in Students Achievement and Alternative Frameworks. INT. J. SCI. EDU, 1994 vol. 21, no. 4,373-388.IJSEpp. pdf.25/3/2006.
Cony Setiawan, Munandar, dan Utami Munandar. (1990). Memupuk Bakat dan Kreativitas Siswa Sekolah Menengah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Driscoll, Marcy P. (1994). Psychology of Learning For Instruction. USA: Allyn & Bacon.
Duffy, Thomas. M and Jonassen, David. H. (1992). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction (A Conversation). New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Assosiates Publisher.
Koesmanto. (2005). Peranan Kemampuan Logika Abstrak Dan Pandang Ruang Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dinamika Gerak Pada Ranah Analisis Dan Sintesis Dengan Pendekatan Problem Solving Untuk Siswa Kelas I Semester I Program akselerasi SMAN 3 Surakarta Tahun 2004/2005. (Tidak dipublikasikan Tesis UNS : Surakarta).
Munandar, Utami. (1999). Pengem-bangan Kreativitas Anak Berba-kat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nasution, S. (2000). Berbagai Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nurhadi dan Agus Gerad Senduk. (2003). Pembelajaran Kontekstual dan Penerapannya Dalam KBK. Malang: Universitas Negeri Ma-lang Press.
Ornstan, Allan. C. dan Lasley, II Thomas. J. (2000). Effective Teaching. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.
Pizzini, Edward. L. (1991). SSCS Implementation Handbook. USA : University Iowa Publisher.
Sulistyani. (2005). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Contextual teaching and Learning (CTL) dan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (STM) Kaitannya Dengan Prestasi Belajar Biologi Ditinjau Dari Kreativitas Siswa. (Tidak dipublikasikan Tesis UNS : Surakarta).
Winkel,W.S. (1996).Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Grasindo.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v4i2.3996
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Bioedukasi
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.