Email this article 
2.png)
4.png){kind=logo}
6.png)
Pengaruh Penggunaan Modul Berbasis Research pada Pembelajaran Think Pair Share dan Group Investigation terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Metakognisi Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014
Abstract
The purpose of the research to determine effect of the use of Module-Based Research on Learning Model of Think Pair Share and Group Investigation to Understanding of Concept and Metacognition Ability of 10th Grade Students at SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali 2013/2014 Academic Year. This research was quasi experiment research which use Pretest-postest Nonequivalent control group design. The research population was all students of 10th Grade at SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali 2013/2014 Academic Year. The sample is taken by using Cluster Random Sampling method, in order to obtain 4 class experimental and 1 control class with the same capabilities. Experimental class is a class with treatment of different learning, namely TPS + module-based research, GI + module-based research, TPS, GI, and one class as a control. Data was collected using a multiple-choice test, test description, and observation sheets. Hypothesis testing using Anacova test. The research concluded that there are significant differences to understanding concept of students as a result of the use Think Pair Share and Group Investigation with module-based research. Results for metacognition abilities showed no significant difference from the treatment that used, namely TPS + module-based research, GI + module-based research, TPS, GI towards metacognitive abilities of of 10th Grade Students at SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali 2013/2014 Academic Year.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L. W. (2001.). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objective. USA: Addison Wesley Longman,Inc.
Aunurrahman. (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Awang, T. S. (2012). Modul for Learning Integral Calculus With Maple: Lecturer’s Views. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 234-245.
Banikowski, A. K. ( 1999). Strategies to Enhance Memory Based On Brain-Research. Focus on Exceptional Children.
Basith, A. (2011). Hubungan Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar Matapelajaran IPA pada Siswa Kelas IV SD dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Jigsaw dan Think Pair Share (TPS). Malang: UM.
Beers, S. Z. (2009). 21st Century Skills. Preparing Students for Their Future. Science Technology Engineering Math, 1-6.
Blakey, E. -S. (1990). Developing Metacognition.Y. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources Syracuse N.
Curwen, M. S. (2010). Increasing Teachers’ Metacognition Develops Students’ Higher Learning during Content Area Literacy Instruction: Finding from the Read-Write Cycle project. Issues in Teacher Education, 151-157.
Dawyer, C. P. (2013). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21stcentury. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43-52.
Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation. School of Psychology, 6–25.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring, A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 906-911.
Gagne, R. M. (1988). In H. &. Manan, Prinsip-Prinsip Belajar Untuk Pengajaran (Essential of learning for Instruction). Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Gama, A. C. (2004). Integrating Metacognition Instruction in Interactive Learning Environments. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex.
Hermawanto, S. K. (2013). Pengaruh Blended Learning terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Penalaran Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas X . Jurnal Pendidikan Fisiska Indonesia, 67-76.
Ibe, H. N. (2009). Metacognitive Strategies on Classroom Participation and Student Achievement in Senior Secondary School Science Classrooms. Science Education International, 25-31.
Kay, K. (2009). Middle School Preparing Young People for 21st Century Life and Work . Middle School Journal, 41-45.
Listiana, L. (2013). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Berpikir dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe GI (GROUP INVESTIGATION) dan TTW (THINK, TALK, WRITE). Surabaya: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya.
Livingston, J., (1997). Metacognition: An overview. Retrieved Jan. 2, 2013 from HYPERLINK "http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm" http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/ Metacog.htm
Louca, E. P. (2003). Metacognition and Theory of Mind . Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Bandung : Remaja Rosda Karya.
Nur, M. (2000). Pengajaran Berpusat Kepada Siswa dan Pendekatan Konstruktivis Dalam Pengajaran. Pusat Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika Sekolah. Surabaya: Unesa .
Purnomo, A. (2013). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dengan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TPS (THINK PAIR SHARE) Dalam Pembelajaran IPS di Sekolah Dasar . Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Purwanto, N. (1994). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rahman, S. &. (2006). Hubungan antara Kesadaran Metakognisi, Motivasi dan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Universiti. Jurnal Pendidikan, 21-39.
Riyanto, Y. (2010 ). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran Sebagai Referensi bagi Pendidik dalam Implementasi Pembelajaran yang Efektif dan Berkualitas. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Rustaman, N. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sagala, S. (2004). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 351–371.
Sharan, Y. & Sharan, S. (1992). Group Investigation: Expanding cooperative Learning. New York: Teacher College Pres.
Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative Learning, Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Summers, R. L. (1998). Research curriculum for residents based on the structure of the scientific method. Medical Teacher, 35-37.
Syafii, W. & Yasin, R. M. (2013). Problem Solving Skills and Learning Achievements through Problem Based Module in Teaching and Learning Biology in High School. Asian Sosial Science, 220-228.
Tan, I. G. C., Lee, C.K.E. & Sharan, S. (2007). Group investigation effects on achievement, motivation, and perceptions of students in Singapore. The Journal of Educational Research, 100.
Trianto. (2007). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
Winkel, W. S. (2004). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Wiryokusumo & Mustaji, I. (1989). Pengelolaan Sumber Belajar. Surabaya: University Press IKIP Surabaya.
Woolfolk, A. (2010). Educational Psychology. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education International.
Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Comprehension as a Basis for Metacognitive Judgments:Effects of Effort After Meaning on Recall and Metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: American Psychological Association Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 552-557.
Zen, A. R. (2010). Hubungan Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar (SD) dalam Pembelajaran Sains pada Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) dan Inkuiri. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UM.
Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 166 -183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v8i1.3544
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Bioedukasi
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.