KEKOSONGAN HUKUM DAN IMPLEMENTASI KEWAJIBAN KERAHASIAAN AKTA OLEH CALON NOTARIS MAGANG (TINJAUAN PASAL 16A AYAT (2) UUJN-P)

Immanuela Christy Asa Suhir Sakri Putri, Athiyah Nurul Izza Rosyada, Jasmine Valery

Abstract

The provisions of Article 16A paragraph (2) of the UUJN-P regulate the obligation of prospective notaries to maintain the confidentiality of deeds, but without being accompanied by strict sanctions for violations of this obligation in the UUJN-P. This study aims to identify the implementation of this article by prospective notaries. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach, as well as qualitative data analysis. The research found a legal vacuum in Article 16A paragraph (2) of the UUJN-P, namely the absence of concrete limitations regarding the scope of confidentiality of deeds that must be maintained by prospective notaries and the absence of juridical sanctions for violations of this obligation. In addition, the implementation of this article shows the application of a subjective confidentiality standard by prospective notaries due to the absence of limitations and strict sanctions, thus affecting prospective notaries in carrying out their obligations.

 

Keywords

Confidentiality; Legal Vacuum; Notary Candidate

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku:
Isharyanto. 2026. Teori Hukum Suatu Pengantar dengan Pendekatan Tematik. WR Publishing.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2015. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Raisul Muttaqien. 2008. Teori Hukum Murni: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif. Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media.


Jurnal:
Akbar Tri Mahendra dan Aisyah Ayu Musyafah. 2023. “Hak Ingkar Notaris dalam Kewajibannya Merahasiakan Akta”. Gorontalo Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2. Gorontalo: Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v6i2.2741

Jean Neltje dan Indrawieny Panjiyoga. 2023. “Nilai-Nilai yang Tercakup di Dalam Asas Kepastian Hukum”. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 5. Bangkinang: Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i5

Komang Supantri dkk. 2024. “Ketidakpastian Hukum Pasal Multitafsir dalam UUJN mengenai Makna Notaris Pailit”. Unes Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4. Padang: Universitas Ekasakti. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1945

Muhammad Dimas G. D dan Rahmida Elriyana. 2024. “Eksistensi Calon Notaris dalam Melaksanakan Magang Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris”. Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6 No. 1. Banjarmasin: Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v7i1.1279

R Erliyani, MH Muhjad, LA Puspita. 2021. “Kewajiban untuk Menjaga Kerahasiaan Akta oleh Notaris dan Karyawan Notaris dalam Perspektif Hukum." Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol. 5, No. 1. Malang: Universitas Islam Malang. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v5i1.9223

Tesis:
Shofy Nabila dkk. 2015. “Implikasi Yuridis Calon Notaris Magang yang Tidak Melaksanakan Kewajibannya Sebagaimana Diatur dalam Pasal 16 A Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris”. Tesis. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya. http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/156674

Peraturan:
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Peraturan Perkumpulan Ikatan Notaris Indonesia Nomor 19/PERKUM/INI/2019 Tentang Magang.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v14i1.118598

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.