Perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi siswa dengan penerapan argument mapping materi sistem sirkulasi ditinjau dari academic self efficacy

Nadia Salsabila, Dwi Oetomo, Muzzazinah Muzzazinah

Sari

EN

This study aims to (1) find out differences in students' argumentation abilities between learning using argument mapping media and not, (2) find out differences in students' argumentation abilities with different levels of academic self-efficacy, (3) find out interaction between mapping media arguments and academic self-efficacy on students' argumentation abilities. This research is quasi-experimental with a posttest-only pattern and nonequivalent design. The research was conducted at a High School in Boyolali  for the 2022/2023 academic year. The instrument for argumentation skills uses an essay test, while for academic self-efficacy, students use a questionnaire with a Likert Scale of 1-4. Data analysis techniques for argumentation skills and academic self-efficacy use the two-way ANOVA test and the LSD (Least Significance Different) test. The results showed that: (1) There are differences in students' argumentation skills between learning by applying media argument mapping; the highest difference lies in the aspects of warrants and backing with a range of scores far enough between the experimental and control classes, namely 22.14 and 15.49 respectively, (2) There are differences in the argumentation abilities of students with different levels of academic self-efficacy. Students with high and moderate academic self-efficacy have better argumentation skills than students with low academic self-efficacy. (3) There is no interaction between media argument mapping and academic self-efficacy on students' argumentation abilities. Academic self-efficacy and media argument mapping have their effects on argumentation ability.

 

ID

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk : (1)mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi siswa antara pembelajaran yang menggunakan media argument mapping dan tidak, (2)mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi siswa dengan tingkat academic self efficacy berbeda, (3)mengetahui interaksi antara media argument mapping dan academic self efficacy terhadap kemampuan argumentasi siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi-experimental design dengan pola posttest only with nonequivalent design. Penelitian dilaksanakan di salah satu SMA Negeri di Boyolali  Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023. Data kemampuan argumentasi siswa dikumpulkan menggunakan tes essay, sedangkan untuk academic  self efficacy siswa menggunakan angket dengan Skala Likert 1-4. Teknik analisis data untuk kemampuan argumentasi dan academic self efficacy menggunakan uji ANOVA 2 jalur (two ways ANOVA) dan uji LSD (Least Significant Different). Hasil menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Terdapat perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi siswa antara pembelajaran dengan penerapan media argument mapping. Perbedaan tertinggi terletak pada aspek warrant dan backing dengan rentang skor cukup jauh antara kelas eksperimen dan kontrol, yakni masing-masing 22,14 dan 15,49,  (2) Terdapat perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi siswa dengan tingkat academic self efficacy berbeda. Siswa yang memiliki academic self efficacy tinggi dan sedang  memiliki kemampuan argumentasi yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa dengan tingkat academic self efficacy rendah, (3) Tidak ada interaksi antara media argument mapping dan academic self efficacy terhadap kemampuan argumentasi siswa. Academic self efficacy dan media argument mapping memiliki pengaruh sendiri-sendiri terhadap kemampuan argumentasi.

Kata Kunci

academic self efficacy; Argument mapping; Argumentation skill;

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Alfurofika, P. S., Waluya, S. B., & Supartono. (2013). Model pembelajaran jigsaw dengan strategi metakognitif untuk meningkatkan self-efficacy dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. UNJMER, 2(2).

Alwisol. (2009). Psikologi Kepribadian Edisi Revisi. UMM Press.
Anbarasu, A., & Bhuvaneswari, M. (2020). Students’ Behaviour in the Classroom Environment: A Review. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3464-9.CH008

Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy (The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman Company.

Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6

Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). Psicología Educativa. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.10.001

Dwyear, Michael, H., & Ian, S. (2015). The effects of argument mapping-infused critical thinking instruction on reflective judgement performance. Elsevier Journal, 16, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.12.002

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M., & Stewart, I. (2013). An examination of the effects of argument mapping on students’ memory and comprehension performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2012.12.002

Ferede, T., Melese, E., Tefera, E., & Mossie, A. (2016). Students’ academic self-efficacy viz-a-viz their academic achievement: Jimma and Hawasa University students in focus. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4314/EJESC.V11I2

Foulstone, A. R., & Kelly, A. B. (2019). Enhancing academic self-efficacy and performance among fourth year psychology students: Findings from a short educational intervention. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.20429/IJSOTL.2019.130209

Habernal, I., Wachsmuth, H., Gurevych, I., & Stein, B. (2018, June 1). The Argument Reasoning Comprehension Task: Identification and Reconstruction of Implicit Warrants. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/N18-1175

Hefter, M. H., ten Hagen, I., Krense, C., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2019). Effective and Efficient Acquisition of Argumentation Knowledge by Self-Explaining Examples: Videos, Texts, or Graphic Novels? Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000350

Hulu, I. L., & Sinaga, D. (2022). The Effect of Learning Media in Guided Inquiry Model Settings on Students’ Science Process Skills in Senior High School of Taman Siswa Pematangsiantar. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Biologi Nukleus (JPBN). https://doi.org/10.36987/jpbn.v8i1.2474

Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, Evidence Evaluation and Critical Thinking inFraser, B.J. (ed.) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer InternationalHandbooks of Education.

Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. R. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2013.01.005

Marneli, D., Dirma, H., & Delfita, R. (2020). Korelasi Self Efficacy dengan Hasil Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA 1 Rambatan Kabupaten Tanah Datar Sumatera Barat. Simbiosa, 9(2), 158.https://doi.org/10.33373/sim-bio.v9i2.2677

McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., & González-Howard, M. Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers’ argumentation instruction in their science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026–2046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547

McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K–12 Teachers. Journal of Science Education, 97(6), 936–972. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081

Müller, J., & Trapp, T. (2015). Using Argumentation to Develop a Set of Rules for Claims Classification. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19857-6_39

Nurinda, S., Sajidan, S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018, January 1). Enhancing High School Students’s Rebuttals as An Important Aspect of Scientific Argumentation Skill Through Problem Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.2991/ICOMSE-17.2018.35

Nyberg, K., Koerber, S., & Osterhaus, C. (2022). Self-effective scientific reasoning? Differences between elementary and secondary school students. Frontline Learning Research. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v10i1.955

Ormrod, J. E. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan (Erlangga (ed.)).


Ostwald, J. (2007). Argument mapping for Critical Thinking. Teaching Excellence. http://www.jostwald.com/ArgumentMapping/OstwaldHandout.pdf

Pangestika, I. W., Ramli, M., Nurmiyati, N., & Sapartiwi, S. (2017). Learning Outcomes on Biology of Grade XI Science Students on Implementation of Socratic Dialogue. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 14(1), 305–310.

Pitorini, D. E., Suciati, S., & Ariyanto, J. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi siswa : Perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog Socrates Students ’ argumentation skills : A comparison between the guided-inquiry learning model and the Socrates dialogue-integrated gu. 6(1), 26–38. DOI:10.21831/jipi.v6i1.27761


Redhana, I. W., & Liliasari. (2008). Program Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis pada Topik Laju Reaksi pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Forum Kependidikan, 27(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i2.36187

Roberts, R., & Johnson, P. M. (2015). Understanding the quality of data: a concept map for ‘the thinking behind the doing’ in scientific practice. Curriculum Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1044459

Saifuddin, M. F., Merdikawati, Q., Yunitasari, L., Handayani, N. D., Widyati, F. N., Damayanti Sumarno, A. N., Fauzi, A., & Firnandho Za, M. Y. (2020). Circulatory system learning through student facilitators and explaining in terms of cognitive learning outcomes. Biosilico. https://doi.org/10.31932/JPBIO.V5I2.598

Sihaloho, L., Rahayu, A., & Wibowo, L. A. (2018). Pengaruh efikasi diri (self efficacy) terhadap hasil belajar Biologi siswa kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri se-kota Bandung. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 4(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v4i1.5671

Sumarni, E. N., Widodo, A., & Solihat, R. (2017). Stimulating Students’ Argumentation using Drawing – based Modeling on The Concept of Ecosystem. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16688

Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.


Triling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills : Learning for Life in Our Times.


Tytler, R., Ferguson, J., & White, P. (2020). A representation construction pedagogy of guided inquiry for learning data modelling. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750672

Wibawa, R. A. P., Prayitno, B. A., & Marjono, M. (2017). Penerapan problem based learning pada materi pencemaran lingkungan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa kelas X MIPA. Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning, 14(1), 361. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/18808

Wijayanti, T. F. (2016). Potensi Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Disertai Argument mapping untuk Memberdayakan Berpikir Kritis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 1(1), 165–175.

Wolfe, M. B. W., & Kurby, C. A. (2017). Belief in the Claim of an Argument Increases Perceived Argument Soundness. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1137446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v12i2.71172

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.