Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik
Sari
The research aimed to improve students’ critical thinking ability through the implementation of guided inquiry learning. The research was a Classroom Action Research conducted in three cycles. Each cycle consisted of four stages: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Subject of the research was the second grader at science 3 class SMAN 6 Surakarta academic year 2014/2015, consisting of 14 boys and 19 girls. Data collecting techniques used in this research were essay test, observation, and interview, which data validation using triangulation technique. Essay test that used in this reasearch containing six aspects of critical thinking ability: interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation. Data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative technique. Spiral model were used for the research procedure.
The result of the research showed that each aspect of critical thinking ability increased within three cycles of guided inquiry learning implementation. Interpretation increased 30,30%; analysis 36,36%; evaluation 41,67%; inference 31,82%; explanation 37,88%; and self-regulation 24,25%.
Based on the data analysis result, it can be concluded that the implementation of guided inquiry learning is able to improve students’ critical thinking ability of second grader at science 3 class SMAN 6 Surakarta academic year 2014/2015Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDF (English)Referensi
Amri, S. & Ahmadi, I. (2010). Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif dalam Kelas. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Bell, T., Urhahne, d., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, Tools, and Challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32 (3), 349-377.
Bono, E. d. (2007). Revolusi Berpikir: Mengajari Anak Anda Berpikir Canggih dan Kreatif dalam Memecahkan Masalah dan Memantik Ide-Ide Baru. Bandung: Penerbit Kaifa.
Depdikbud. (2013). Lampiran IV Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia No. 81 A tentang Implementasi Kurikulum Pedoman Umum Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Departeman Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Ennis, R. H. (2008). Nationwide Testing of Critical Thinking for Higher Education: Vigilance. Teaching Philosophy, 31 (1), 1-26.
Facione, P.A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Count. Insight Assessment.
Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21: Kunci Sukses Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Johnson, E. (2009). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Bandung: Mizan Learning Center.
Kitot, A.K.A., Ahmad, A.R., & Seman, A.A. (2010). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Teaching in Enhanching Students’ Critical Thinking. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(c), 264-273.
Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. London: Libraries Unlimited.
Opara, J.A. & Oguzor, N.S. (2011). Inquiry Instructional Method and the School Science Curriculum. Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (3), 188-198.
Sahfriana, I., Subchan, W., & Suratno. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation (GI) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Keterampilan Sosial Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA Biologi untuk Materi Ajar Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Kelas 8-C Semester Gasal di SMP Negeri 1 Bangil Pasuruan. Pancaran, 4 (2), 213-222.
Sani, R.A. (2013). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Scott, C., Tomasek, T., & Matthews, C.E. (2010). Thinking Like a Scientist. Science and Children, 38-42.
Thomas, T. (2011). Developing First Year Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Asian Social Science, 7 (4).
Thompson, C. (2011). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: Process Over Output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (9).
Uno, H.B., Lamatenggo, N., & Koni, S.M.A. (2012). Menjadi Peneliti PTK yang Profesional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.