PENGARUH ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS

EKA RAKHMAWATI, MURNI RAMLI, MUZZAYYINAH MUZZAYYINAH, RADEN RARA SAPARTINI

Sari

The research aims to know the effect of Assessment for Learning (AfL) to argumentative skill of high school students. The  research used a quasi experimental design with nonequivalent control group design. The design consists of  control class and experiment class. Two clasess was randomly selected from 9 classes. The participants were 67 students from  grade 10 of one high school in Surakarta. Data of argumentative skill was a pre-post test of AfL. The hypothesis test using t test and paired sample t test. The results of hypothesis testing showed that the significant value gained 0.000 <0.05, therefore H0 is rejected or H1 is accepted. The effect of Assessment for Learning (AfL) to argumentative skill of high school students is the significantly different between control and experimental class

Kata Kunci

Assessment for Learning, argumentative skill

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J., Aldrich, N.J., & Tenenbaum, H.R. (2011). Does discoverybased instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 1-18.

Aufschnaiter, V. A., Eduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 101–131.

Baharuddin & Wahyuni, Esa Nur. (2010). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jogjakarta : Ar-Ruzz Media

Basuki, Ismet & Hariyanto.( 2014). Asesmen Pembelajaran. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Block, R.M. (2012). A discussion of the effects of open-book and closed-book exams on student achievement in an introductory statistics course. Primus, 22(3), 228-238.

Bricker, L.A. & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92 (3), 473-498.

Chen, Y.C. (2011). Examining the Integration of Talk and Writing for Student Knowledge Construction through Argumentation.Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States of America.

Duschl, RA. (2008). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. Dalam S. Erduran & M.P. Jiménez Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. (hlm. 159–175). Dordrecht: Springer.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3-16.

Germer, C.K. (2009). The Mindful Path to Self-Compassion. USA : The Guilford Press

Handayani, Putri & Murniati, Sardiyanto. (2015). Analisis argumentasi peserta didik kelas x sma muhammadiyah 1 palembang dengan menggunakan model argumentasi toulmin. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2 (1).

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feed back. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.

McNeill, K.L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Assessing middle school students’ content knowledge and scientific reasoning through written explanations. Paper Presented at the University of Maine, No Question Left Behind: Bringing Guided Inquiry Curriculum Materials into the Classroom, hlm. 1-13, University of Maine, Maine, United States.

McNeill, K.L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Designing instructional materials to support students’ in writing scientific explanations: using evidence and reasoning across the middle school years. Paper Presented at the Annual International Conference Grand Challenges and Great Opportunities in Science Education National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual, hlm. 1-17, Hyatt Regency Orange County, California.

Moore, J. C. & Rubbo, L. J. (2012). Scientific reasoning abilities of non-science majors in physics-basedcourses. American Physical Society, 8(1), 1-8.

Ng, Eugenia M.W. (2016). Fostering pre-service teachers' self-regulated learning through self- and peer assessment of wiki projects. Computers & Education, 98, 180-191

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2009). Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta : BPFE

Ormrod, Jeanne Ellise. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan Jilid 1.Jakarta : Erlangga

Pritasari, A. C., Dwiastuti, S., Probosari, R.M., & Sajidan. (2015). The argumentation capacity improvement through the problem based learning implementation in class x mia 1 sma batik 2 surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4 (2), 158-163.

Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90, 986–1004.

Schen, M.S. (2007). Scientific reasoning skills development in the introductory biology courses for undergraduates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States of America

Shute, V.J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.

Slavin, Robert E. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan Jilid 1. Jakarta : Indeks

Slavin, Robert E. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Jilid 2:Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta : Indeks

Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B. & Knight, J.K. (2008). The genetics concept assessment: a new concept in-ventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 7, 422-430.

Squire, K., & Mingfong. (2007). Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16 (1).

Stiggins, R., & Chapuis, J. (2006). What a difference a word makes: assessment for learning rather than assessment of learning help students succeed. Journal of Staff Development, 27(1), 10-14.

Suwandi, Sarwiji. (2011). Model Asesmen dalam Pembelajaran. Surakarta : Yuma Pustaka

Tseng, S.C., & Tsai, C.C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: a study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.

Viyanti. (2015). The profile of argumentation skill using “toulmin argumentation pattern” analysis in the archimedes principal on the students of sma kota bandar lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4 (1), 86-89.

Williams, J.B. (2006). The place of the closed book, invigilated final examination in a knowledge economy. Educational Media International, 43(2), 107-119

Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93(4), 687-719

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v5i1.28902

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.