汉语课堂答问评价的现状åŠç­–略研究—以å¤ç”¸ MARANATHA 高中二年级学生为例

Yunita Yunita, Weniyanti Weniyanti

Abstract


Classroom questioning and assessment are important components of classroom interaction and are also crucial in Chinese language teaching. However, in actual classroom teaching, most Chinese language teachers fail to understand the importance of student questioning and assessment. As a result, classroom teaching fails to achieve good results, to some extent diminishing students' interest in learning Chinese. This paper takes 96 students from the second grade of CHRISTIAN MARANATHA High School, divided into 24 students from class XI MIA, 36 students from class XI IIS 1, and 36 students from class XI IIS 2, as research subjects to investigate the current situation of classroom question and answer evaluation in high school and to propose relevant teaching strategies for classroom question and answer evaluation. This study mainly uses classroom observation, questionnaire survey, and interviews to analyze the current situation and strategies of classroom questioning and assessment. The survey results show that the current situation of classroom questioning and assessment for the second-year students at Pontianak MARANATHA High School includes seven aspects, analyzed in terms of the form of questions posed by teachers, the objects of assessment, the subjects of assessment, the timing of assessment, the content of assessment, the effectiveness of assessment, and the methods of assessment. Mainly, it includes: teachers often pose questions that focus on memory; the objects are mostly the teachers themselves, and opportunities for students to be assessed in classroom questioning are not profound; teachers mostly assess individuals; teachers' assessments are mostly direct; teachers pay more attention to the learning process and knowledge skills; questions posed by teachers mostly have a positive impact; and teachers mostly use oral language for classroom questioning assessment. The author hopes that this research will provide guidance and assistance for Chinese language teaching at CHRISTIAN MARANATHA High School. It analyzes the existing problems in classroom question and answer evaluation and proposes relevant teaching strategies based on theoretical guidance and classroom standards. These strategies aim to help teachers better understand the importance of classroom question and answer evaluation, continually enhance their evaluation capabilities, and promote the overall development of students' abilities. Additionally, it can serve as a reference for Chinese language classroom question and answer evaluations in other high schools.


Keywords


Classroom; Questioning; Assessment; Current Situation; Strategies

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Abdika, Y., Arham, M. A., & Sudirman, S. (2019). Pengaruh Metode Tanya Jawab Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jambura Economic Education Journal, 1(2).

Ependi, S. (2018). Penerapan metode tanya jawab untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar Bahasa Indonesia siswa kelas VI SD Negeri 012 Pangkalan Baru Kecamatan Siak Hulu. Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 256-264.

Fahmi, M. K., Mantasiah, R., & Junaeny, A. The Application of Whispering Chain Method in Training Mandarin Listening Skills of Class VII Students of Frater Junior High School Makassar. Journal of Maobi, 2(1), 64-73.

Julina, J., Ayuningtias, N., & Rudiansyah, R. (2022, March). STAD Type Cooperative Learning Model Strategy in Mandarin Learning in Tebing Tinggi City. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Literature Innovation in Chinese Language, LIONG 2021, 19-20 October 2021, Purwokerto, Indonesia.

Sitohang, J. (2017). Penerapan metode tanya jawab untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar ipa pada siswa sekolah dasar. Suara Guru, 3(4), 681-688.

Siregar, E. A. (2013). Meningkatkan keterampilan bertanya dengan menggunakan metode tanya jawab pada mata pelajaran PKn siswa kelas IV SD. School Education Journal, 1(1), 103-112.

陈利平,孙广柱.(2021).å°å­¦è¯¾å ‚教学中æé—®å­˜åœ¨çš„问题åŠå¯¹ç­–[J].中国多媒体与网络教学学报.

朱园园.(2019).å°å­¦è¯­æ–‡é˜…读教学中引入多元智能ç†è®ºçš„ç ”å®‚ä¸€ä¸€ä»¥ã€Šæ¯”å°¾å·´ã€‹ä¸ºä¾‹ï¼Žä¸­å›½æ ¡å¤–æ•™è‚²,73.

æ¨å…‰æƒ .(2022).å°å­¦è¯­æ–‡è¯¾å ‚ç­”é—®è¯„ä»·çš„é—®é¢˜ä¸Žå¯¹ç­–ç ”ç©¶â€”â€”åŸºäºŽæ ¸å¿ƒç´ å…»è§†åŸŸçš„åˆ†æž.贵州师范大学, 21.

牟èŠç‡•,钟惊雷.(2013).å°å­¦ç”Ÿè¯¾å ‚答问æ„è¯†çš„çŽ°çŠ¶ä¸ŽåŸ¹å…»ç­–ç•¥ç ”ç©¶.科技资 讯,186-189.

å¼ ç£Š.(2016).å°å­¦è¯­æ–‡è¯¾å ‚æé—®ç­–ç•¥ç ”ç©¶.云å—师范大学.

å¼ èŽ‰.(2015).å°å­¦è¯­æ–‡è¯¾å ‚有效æé—®ç ”ç©¶.扬州大学.

曲西巴姆.(2015).å°å­¦è¯¾å ‚æé—®æœ‰æ•ˆæ€§çš„æå‡ç­–略探æž.网游世界,279.

缪军.(2017).å°å­¦è¯¾å ‚æé—®çŽ¯èŠ‚å­˜åœ¨çš„é—®é¢˜åŠè§£å†³å¯¹ç­–[J].考试周刊, 22.

胡英.(2018).å°å­¦è¯¾å ‚评价存在的问题åŠå¯¹ç­–ç ”ç©¶Â·è‹å·žå¤§å­¦,12-13.

è‹æ…•åŽ.(2021).å°å­¦è¯­æ–‡è¯¾å ‚评价的现状与改进建议[J].广西教育,94-95.

范晶晶.(2019).å°å­¦è¯¾å ‚评价语的使用现状åŠå¯¹ç­–ç ”ç©¶.安庆师范大学.

薛婷.(2017).基于对è¯ç†è®ºçš„å°å­¦ç”Ÿä¹ ä½œè¯„ä»·ç­–ç•¥ç ”ç©¶.西北师范大学.

邹雪芹.(2016).è°ˆå­¦ç”Ÿè¯¾å ‚ç­”é—®èƒ½åŠ›çš„ç¼ºå¤±ä¸ŽåŸ¹å…».化学教与学,63-64.

é­è”¡è¿ž.(2019).å°å­¦ç”Ÿè‹±è¯­è¯¾å ‚答问的调查与分æž.长江丛刊.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/maobi.v2i2.90779

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Yunita Yunita; Weniyanti Weniyanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

        CONFUCIUS INSTITUTE Publisher

        Confucius Institute, Universitas Sebelas Maret
        Jalan Ir. Sutami 36A Kentingan, Surakarta, Indonesia 

        Email: maobi@mail.uns.ac.id

        Copyright © 2023. Confucius Institute

        Creative Commons Licence

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Â