Mathematics Learning Practice Training with the "MiKIR" Approach to Improve Analysis and Algebra Reasoning Abilities in Mathematics MGMP SMP Sragen

Ikrar Pramudya, Mardiyana Mardiyana, Sutrima Sutrima, Ponco Sujatmiko, Dyah Ratri Aryuna

Abstract

The curriculum currently applied at the junior high school level is Curriculum 2013. This curriculum focuses on student learning activities. In a sense, knowledge must be actively built by students themselves. This paradigm has been known for a long time. At least since the introduction of the concept of active student learning in 1984 by Professor Dr. Conny R. Semiawan. However, in reality the teaching and learning process that occurs is that the teacher remains the center of attention when the teaching and learning process takes place in the classroom. In other words, those who are active in learning are still teachers and students sitting quietly listening to the teacher's explanation. The challenge is whether mathematics teachers are willing and brave to change the mindset from "teacher as a learning center" to "students as a learning center". To create a teaching and learning process with "students as the learning center", of course, it must be started from the making of the learning design to the practice of its application in the learning process in the classroom. In line with these wishes and intentions, this service activity answered by providing "Training and Assistance in Mathematics Learning Practices with the" MiKIR "Approach to Improve Analytical and Algebraic Reasoning Ability for mathematics teachers who are members of the Mathematics MGMP SMP Sragen Regency. In this case, the "MiKIR" approach is interpreted as a learning approach which, when applied in a teaching and learning process, occurs in students’ situations and conditions: experiencing, interaction, communication, and reflection both between students and students and students and teachers and that means "Students as a learning center".

 

Keywords

teacher as a learning center, algebraic reasoning and analysis skills, MiKIR approach, students as a learning center

Full Text:

PDF

References

Cifarelli, V. (1988). The Role of Reflective Abstraction as Learning Processes in Problem Solving. Disertasi: Universitas Purdue. Gibson, A. (1987). Active Learning: Teaching and Learning in the Junior Division. North York: North York Board of Education. Merliza, P. (2016). Peranan Kemampuan Abstraksi Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Soal Rich Context Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 104-110. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21436 Nurhasanah, F. (2018). Abstraction of pre-service mathematics teachers in learning non-conventional mathematics concepts. Disertasi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Permendiknas RI Nomor 16 Tahun 2007. Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Depdiknas: Jakarta. Salyers, V. (2006, July). Using the ICARE Format for Structuring Online Courses. Impact 2006, WebCT, 8th Annual Users Conference; San Antonio, TX. Sukandi, U. 2018. Modul Praktik yang Baik dalam Pembelajaran di SMP dan MTs. Walters, K., Smith, T.M., Leindwand, S., Surr, W., Stein, A., Bailey, P. (2014). An up-close look at student-centered math teaching. American Institute for Research: New-England. Zain, S., Rasidi, F., & Abidin, I. (2012) Student-Centred learning in mathematics-constructivism in the classroom. Journal of international education, 8 (4), 319-327.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.