Development of HOTS Test in Microbiology Course using Microsoft Office and Visual Basic for Application



This research aims to develop higher-level thinking tests on microbiology using computer assisted to measure high-level thinking skills of students who attended the Microbiology Course. The instrument was developed on Microsoft Office Power Point and Visual Basic for Application. The research stages followed the ten steps of Borg and Gall's R and D, done from February to July 2016. To test the validity of the instruments, the following steps were done: (1) expert validation involving microbiologists, ICT specialists, expert in research and evaluation of education; (2) small trial involved 12 students who took micobiology at Department of Biology Education of Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS); (3) Test involves 20 students who took the same courses; and (4) external validity test involving 20 students who took the same courses. Pearson correlation analysis was applied for analysis the external validity test. The findings were the instruments were valid, reliable with high coefficient of 0.872> 0.456 (r table), level of difficulty with difficulty index of 0.3 to 0.7, and discriminant power either with index of 0.3 to 0.7. External validity was 0.757 (Strong). Conclusion of the study is a test instrument is feasible and effective to measure high-level thinking skills of students in microbiological related content.



Research and Development Test; computer-aided test; Tests for higher level thinking; measurement instruments

Full Text:



Aiken, L. R. (1985). Content Validity and Realibility of Single Items or Questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 955-959.

Anderson, L.W & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing. New York: Longman.

Azwar, S. (2003). Tes Prestasi Fungsi dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar. Edisi II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research an introduction (4th Ed). White Plains: Logman Inc.

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Forth Worth: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, INC.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Kusumadani, A. I. (2013). Proceeding Seminar Nasional Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran Sans dan Budaya Penelian Sains Menuju Indonesia Maju. Surakarta: Pasca Sarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Linn, R. L & Groundlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and Assessment In Teaching. Eighth edition. New Jersey: Merril an imprint of Prentice Hall.

Sudjiono, A. (2005). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yen, W. M. (1992). “Item Response Theory”. dalam Alkin M. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Educational Research (pp. 657-666). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Bioedukasi

BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi

Print p-ISSN: 1693-265X
Online ISSN: 2549-0605
Published by: Department of Biology Education,Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.