Email this article 
2.png)
4.png){kind=logo}
6.png)
Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS pada Mata Kuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan
Abstract
Lemahnya argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran telah banyak menjadi perhatian, terutama dalam hal mengevaluasi dan mengkonstrak permasalahan dan solusinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pada mata kuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif untuk mendapatkan gambaran keterampilan argumentasi mahasiswa semester 3 di Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS melalui tugas tertulis yang diberikan. Penilaian argumentasi mahasiswa mengacu pada Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) yang memuat komponen claim, evidence, reasoning dan rebuttal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS masih tergolong rendah, dibuktikan dengan skor rerata claim sebesar 52%, evidence sebesar 42%, reasoning sebesar 15% dan rebuttal sebesar 10%. Temuan ini akan dijadikan dasar bagi penelitian lanjutan mengenai model dan strategi pembelajaran inovatif yang dapat meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi dan penalaran ilmiah terutama bagi calon guru biologi.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acar, O. & Patton, B. R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in An Argumentation-based Guided Inquiry Course. In Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences (46). pp. 4756 – 4760.
Berland, L.K. & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for Scientific Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 49 (1): 68–94.
Clark, D., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Menekse, M., & Erkens, G. (2007). Technology-enhanced learning environments to upport students' argumentation. In S. Erduran & M.P. Jimenez Aleixandre (Eds). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Netherlands: Springer. pp. 217-243.
Jaber, L.Z. & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to Feel Like a Scientist. Science Education, (100):189–220.
Konstantinidou, A. & Macagno, F. (2013). Understanding Students’ Reasoning: Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education. Science & Education. 22 (5). Pp. 1069-1087.
Crowell, A. & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-year Intervention Study. Journal of Cognition and Development. 15 (2): 363–381.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview. In Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P.(Eds). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Netherlands : Springer. Pp. 3 – 27.
Macagno, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., & Kuhn, D. (2015). Argumentation Theory in Education Studies: Coding and Improving Students’ Argumentative Strategies. Topoi 34:523–537.
Sampson, V. & Scheilgh, S. (2013). Scientific argumentation in biology : 30 classroom activities. United States of America : National Science Teachers Association.
Schleigh, S. P., Bossè, M. J., & Lee, T. (2011). Redefining curriculum integration and professional development: In-service teachers as agents of change. Current Issues in Education, 14 (3).
Zohar, A. (2007). Science Teacher Education and Professional Development in Argumentation. In S. Erduran & M.P. Jimenez Aleixandre (Eds). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Netherlands: Springer. Science Teacher Education and Professional Development in Argumentation. Pp. 245-268.
Toulmin, S.E. (2003). The Uses of Argument. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 89-95, 114-118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Bioedukasi
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.