Analisis Bibliometrik Global terhadap Metode Fonik dan Kesadaran Fonologi Dalam Membaca Permulaan: Apa yang Berubah di Abad 21?

Wahyu Nuning Budiarti

Abstract

(1) Latar Belakang: Penguasaan keterampilan membaca permulaan merupakan pijakan utama bagi keberhasilan akademis, namun belum ada kajian yang secara khusus memetakan lanskap publikasi ilmiah secara global mengenai metode fonik dan kesadaran fonologi di abad ke-21. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara bibliometrik perkembangan global riset tersebut serta mengungkap pergeseran utamanya. (2) Metode: Penelitian kuantitatif ini menggunakan desain analisis bibliometrik untuk memetakan literatur dengan mengevaluasi 1.073 meta data dokumen yang bersumber dari basis data Scopus (rentang waktu 2000-2026), yang dianalisis menggunakan perangkat lunak statistik R Studio melalui Biblioshiny. (3) Hasil: Kajian ini menunjukkan tren perkembangan literatur yang positif dengan tingkat pertumbuhan publikasi tahunan mencapai 7,31%. Ekstraksi data juga mengonfirmasi tingginya iklim kolaborasi penelitian yang melibatkan 2.630 penulis dengan 17,33% kemitraan riset lintas negara, serta publikasi yang didominasi oleh 937 artikel jurnal orisinal. (4) Implikasi: Hasil pemetaan dari kajian ini diharapkan mampu memberikan pijakan ilmiah yang kuat bagi para pendidik dan pembuat kebijakan dalam merancang pembelajaran membaca awal, intervensi membaca, serta kurikulum pendidikan berbasis bukti empiris terkini.

Keywords

Analisis Bibliometix; Metode Fonik; Kesadaran Fonologi; Membaca Permulaan

References

Ahn, H., & Sangster, C. (2026a). The elephant in the phonics room: rethinking pronunciation norms in early reading instruction. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 49(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-026-00106-3

Ahn, H., & Sangster, C. (2026b). The elephant in the phonics room: rethinking pronunciation norms in early reading instruction. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 49(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-026-00106-3

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bai, Y., Hubers, F., Cucchiarini, C., van Hout, R., & Strik, H. (2026). Learning to read in first grade through a reading tutor that employs automatic speech recognition. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 31(3), 1741–1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09860-8

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410042

Chamberlin, C. (2026). Learning to Read Mediascapes as Decolonizing Practice in Language Teacher Education. TESOL Journal, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.70137

Chand, P. P., Chand, S. P., & Kumar, K. K. (2026). Teachers’ knowledge and practices in systematic Phonics instruction in Fiji’s lower primary classrooms. The Australian Educational Researcher, 53(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-026-00955-4

Chen, M., Yin, G., Wong, W. L., Ya Shak, M. S., Abdul Rahman, M., & Lee, M. C. (2024). The effectiveness of a school-based phonics instructional material. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/FLS.v6i2.2130

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Eberhard‐Moscicka, A. K., Jost, L. B., Raith, M., & Maurer, U. (2015). Neurocognitive mechanisms of learning to read: print tuning in beginning readers related to word‐reading fluency and semantics but not phonology. Developmental Science, 18(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12189

Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

Freire, M. R. (2022). Psychological Research in an Australian Remote Indigenous Context: Towards a Culturally Safe Cognitive Research Approach. Psychology and Developing Societies, 34(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713336221115553

Freire, M. R., & Pammer, K. (2019). Reading Between the Lines: Neurocognition and Reading Acquisition in Remote Indigenous Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(3), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119827380

Gai, X., & Jiang, Y. (2026). The impact of prior phonological-semantic connection experience on phonics instruction for Chinese-speaking adults. System, 139, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2026.104038

Gioia, P., Ziegler, J. C., & Deauvieau, J. (2026). Strict phonics instruction outperforms mixed phonics: Evidence from a large-scale study. Learning and Instruction, 107, 102463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102463

Goldberg, M., & Goldenberg, C. (2022). Lessons Learned? Reading Wars, Reading First, and a Way Forward. The Reading Teacher, 75(5), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2079

Heller, R. (2022). The Editor’s Note: Enough already with the reading wars. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(8), 4–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221099999

Huang, L., & Wang, Y. (2026). Exploring the contribution of topic familiarity and listening strategies to listening comprehension among L2 learners of English. BMC Psychology, 14(1), 373. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04000-y

Ibaibarriaga, G., Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2026). The impact of handwriting and typing on the reading acquisition process: a study using an unfamiliar orthography. Reading and Writing, 39(6), 2389–2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10703-2

Li, X., Zhang, D., Liu, S., & Liu, Y. (2026). Learning to Read in Chinese: A Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of Cognitive-Linguistic Skills in Chinese Word Reading. Educational Psychology Review, 38(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10205-9

Liu, D., Dai, W., Liu, H., Yi, H., & Kong, W. (2026). Bridging Static Images and Dynamic Brain Signal for Visual Decoding. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 72(3), 7721–7734. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2026.3688178

MacGregor, S., & Xie, E. (2026). A narrative review of research-informed teaching practice in teacher education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102877

Milne, J., Law, J. M., & Duncan, L. G. (2026). Mind the Gap: Teacher Knowledge, Classroom Reality, and Early Literacy Instruction. Education Sciences, 16(6), 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060843

Naidu, R., Campbell, S., & Walker, S. (2026). Beyond the phonics debate: Blending code and context in classroom reading instruction. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70153

Ndijuye, L. G., Basil, P. T., Ndibalema, P., Lawrent, G., Gabriel, P., & Mbepera, J. (2025). Teaching reading in early grades: the classroom practices for integrating phonics approach into whole-language learning. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2587993

Ngema, M., & Phala, T. (2025). Cooperative Learning as a Teaching Strategy to Enhance Graphophonics Knowledge in Grade 1 African Home Language Classes. Africa Education Review, 21(4), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2025.2597838

Niklas, F., Jester, M., Ehmig, S. C., Bauer, K., Bertel, S., Birnbaum, L., Blank, S., Brendel-Kepser, I., Delucchi Danhier, R., Ernst, T., Gogolin, I., Hartmann, K., Heinzelmann, A., Kröner, S., Konerding, M., Krug, F., Lachmann, T., Ludewig, U., Neumann, A., … John, P. (2026). Reading competencies in a digital age: new directions and challenges of digital approaches to support reading. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 41(3), 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-026-01165-3

Niyibizi, O. (2026). Understanding pre-service teachers’ perceptions of their readiness for teaching practices in the context of higher education. Pedagogical Research, 11(2), em0265. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/18607

Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065

Peixoto, B., Bessa, L. C. P., Gonçalves, G., Bessa, M., & Melo, M. (2026). Immersive Virtual Reality in the Language Classroom: Insights from a Semester of Practice (hlm. 373–384). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-32032-2_34

Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Dalam Journal of the Royal Society Interface (Vol. 11, Nomor 98). Royal Society. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378

Pfost, M., Hattie, J., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2014). Individual differences in reading development: a review of 25 Years of empirical research on matthew effects in reading. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 203–244. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313509492

Potier Watkins, C., Caporal, J., Merville, C., Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2020). Accelerating reading acquisition and boosting comprehension with a cognitive science-based tablet training. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00152-6

Remon, A., Mascheretti, S., Voronin, I., Feng, B., Ouellet-Morin, I., Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Robaey, P., Andlauer, T. F. M., Boivin, M., & Dionne, G. (2025). Mediational effects of reading-related intermediate phenotypes from polygenic scores to reading skills. npj Science of Learning, 10(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00346-x

Reschly, A. L. (2010). Reading and school completion: Critical connections and matthew effects. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 26(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560903397023

Sanford, A. K., Pinkney, C. J., Loman, S., Brown, J. E., Just, T., Flori, K., Swift, C., & Ramstead, H. (2026). The Effects of PLUSS: Adapting an Evidence‐Based Reading Intervention for Multilingual Learners. Psychology in the Schools, 63(10), 1517–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.70182

Shafee, A., Mat Noor, M. S. A., & Chai, Z. F. (2025). An exploration of teachers’ practices related to using the phonics approach in Malaysian ESL classrooms. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523088

Shankar, N. B., Wang, Z., Eren, E., & Alwan, A. (2027). Compositional domain adaptation for automatic speech recognition with headwise selective attention merging. Computer Speech & Language, 101, 102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2026.102012

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of liteacy. International Reading Association.

Tezcan, F., Ten Oever, S., Bai, F., te Rietmolen, N., & Martin, A. E. (2026). Linguistic structure and language familiarity sharpen phoneme encoding in the brain. Communications Biology, 9(1), 638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09865-8

Westby, C. (2023). Understanding the Reading Wars. Word of Mouth, 35(2), 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950231200957b

Yu, H., Kim, J. S., & Lee, Y. R. (2026). Meta-Regression Analysis of Reading Comprehension Gaps and Their Correlates in Korean Elementary Students: Comparing Poor Readers and Typically Developing Readers. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 31(2), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.260218

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v14i4.128025

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.