Profil adversity quotient peserta didik kelas IV sekolah dasar di Kecamatan Pedan

Fidella Nur Khoir, Roy Ardiansyah

Abstract

Kecerdasan intelektual (IQ) sering disebut sebagai faktor utama yang berkontribusi terhadap keberhasilan akademis, tetapi penelitian terkini menyoroti pentingnya kecerdasan menghadapi tantangan (AQ) untuk menentukan ketahanan siswa terhadap tantangan. AQ didefinisikan sebagai kemampuan untuk mengatasi kesulitan, dan dikategorikan menjadi tiga tingkatan: Quitters, Campers, dan Climbers. Individu dengan AQ rendah cenderung menyerah ketika menghadapi rintangan, sedangkan individu dengan AQ tinggi menunjukkan kecenderungan untuk tekun dalam mencari solusi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi profil AQ siswa sekolah dasar kelas empat di kecamatan Pedan. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif, dengan ukuran sampel 50 siswa dari tiga sekolah dasar negeri terakreditasi A dan B. Pengukuran AQ dilakukan berdasarkan empat aspek: Control, Origin and Ownership, Reach, dan Endurance. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas siswa tergolong Campers (58%). Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun peserta didik secara umum menunjukkan ketahanan dalam menghadapi tantangan, mereka mungkin belum mencapai tingkat kegigihan yang optimal. Studi ini merekomendasikan penelitian masa depan, pemeriksaan yang lebih mendalam terhadap faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi AQ dan pengembangan strategi pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan ketahanan akademis siswa.

Keywords

Profile; Adversity Quotient; Primary School

References

R. Rosita, D. Widjaja, A. Anton, Elisha, R. Ongsa, and A. P. Karo-Karo, “Pelatihan Millenials Era – Smart Generation untuk Peningkatan IQ, SQ, PQ dan EQ,” SWARNA J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 352–358, 2024, doi: 10.55681/swarna.v3i4.1279.[2] B. R. Hotmauli, O. P. Sijabat, and E. M. Sirait, “Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosional terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri 091515 Buntu Turunan,” J. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Masy. Nommensen Siantar, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 50–72, 2023.[3] Muin and Kusmaladewi, “Kecerdasaan Emosional , Intelektual , Regisiutas , dan Prestasi Belajar Pendahuluan,” CJPE Cokroaminoto Juornal Prim. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 243–252, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.722024.4412.[4] P. G. Stoltz, Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.[5] J. M. Gavhane and R. Pagare, “Artificial intelligence for education and its emphasis on assessment and adversity quotient: a review,” Educ. Train., vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 609–645, 2024, doi: 10.1108/ET-04-2023-0117.[6] C. W. Suryaningrum, Purwanto, Subanji, H. Susanto, Y. D. W. K. Ningtyas, and M. Irfan, “Semiotic reasoning emerges in constructing properties of a rectangle: A study of adversity quotient,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2020, doi: 10.22342/jme.11.1.9766.95-110.[7] Y. Zhao and B. Sang, “The role of emotional quotients and adversity quotients in career success,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, no. February, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128773.[8] D. P. Astuti, A. K. Widiatami, and A. Susanti, “Effects of Achievement Moti-vation, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Concept on the Adversity Quotient,” Din. Pendidik., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 110–120, 2023, doi: 10.15294/dp.v18i1.44396.[9] H. R. Juwita, Roemintoyo, and B. Usodo, “The Role of Adversity Quotient in the Field of Education: A Review of the Literature on Educational Development,” Int. J. Educ. Methodol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 507–515, 2020, doi: 10.12973/ijem.6.3.507.[10] M. Hulaikah, I. N. S. Degeng, Sulton, and F. D. Murwani, “The effect of experiential learning and adversity quotient on problem solving ability,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 869–884, 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13156a.[11] Y. Yustiana, T. A. Kusmayadi, and L. Fitriana, “Mathematical problem solving ability of vocational high school students based on adversity quotient,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012092.[12] Riswang, H. Ihsan, and Alimuddin, “Students’ Thinking Process in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Adversity Quotient,” Int. Conf. Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 611, no. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, pp. 289–293, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icoesm-21/125965673[13] M. Fauziah, S. Marmoah, T. Murwaningsih, and K. Saddhono, “The effect of thinking actively in a social context and creative problem-solving learning models on divergent-thinking skills viewed from adversity quotient,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 537–568, 2020, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.537.[14] I. Luthfiyani, Yurniwati, and Z. P. Akbar, “Pengaruh Model Brain Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah ditinjau Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 13, no. 001, pp. 581–592, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.1440.[15] L. Ismawati and I. N. Andriyani, “Correlation Self-Efficacy and Adversity Quotient of Students at SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Wedi Klaten,” Edunesia J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 78–88, 2022, doi: 10.51276/edu.v3i1.212.[16] Suheri, P. Setyosari, S. Utaya, and R. W. Ery Tri Djatmika, “Adversity quotient among students at traditional moslem school,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 191–196, 2021, doi: 10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.1.30.[17] L. R. Hima, “Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Tahapan Krulik dan Rudnick Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient,” Edu Cendikia J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 128–135, 2024, doi: 10.47709/educendikia.v4i01.4161.[18] Rahmawati, K. H. Titisari, and S. Pawenang, “Learning interest, achievement motivation, learning style, and self-reliance of learning effect on student achievement at SMP Batik Surakarta,” Int. J. Econ. Bus. Account. Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/IJEBAR[19] N. G. A. M. Mahayani, I. M. Darmada, and S. S. Adji, “The Relationship of Divergent Thinking Ability, Learning Discipline, and Resilience to Adversity Towards The Mathematics Learning Outcomes of 5th Grade Elemtary School Students in Cluster 2 Mekarsari-Baturiti,” Mathline J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1399–1414, 2023, doi: 10.31943/mathline.v8i4.417.[20] R. W. Kartika, P. Megawanti, and A. R. Hakim, “Pengaruh adversity quotient dan task commitment terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 206–216, 2021, doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.36831.[21] J. Anju and D. J. Sahoo, “Adversity quotient: A review of related literature,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Mod. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 26–32, 2023, doi: 10.59828/ijsrmst.v2i10.156.[22] E. Gradini and J. Noviani, “Students Profile of Adversity Quotient in Mathematics Learning: Control, Origin and Ownership, Reach, and Endurance,” Am. J. STEM Educ. Issues Perspect., vol. 3, pp. 84–104, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.32674/2y5p9359.[23] H. Mahfud, F. Purnama Adi, I. R. Widianto Atmojo, and R. Ardiansyah, “Peningkatan kompetensi evaluasi pembelajaran berbasis teknologi pada guru SD di kota Surakarta,” J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/jpd.v7i2.44451.[24] A. Nurlaelah, M. Ilyas, and Nurdin, “Pengaruh Adversity Quotient Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SD,” Prox. J. Penelit. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 89–97, 2021, doi: 10.30605/proximal.v4i2.1367.[25] S. Suryandari and L. Yuliana, “The Effect of Adversity Quotient (AQ) on Natural Science Learning Outcomes in Elementary School Students,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 599–606, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i2.212.[26] R. K. Huda and H. Mahfud, “Analisis penerapan keterampilan dasar mengajar guru pada mata pelajaran ppkn kelas vi sekolah dasar,” J. Didakt. Dwija Indria, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 226–232, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v12i3.[27] S. Utami, N. Azizah, M. Hajaroh, E. I. Eliasa, R. Sovayunanto, and H. Siswoko, “Profil Kecerdasan Adversitas (Adversity Quotient) Siswa Kelas XII SMAN 1 Tarakan,” QUANTA J. Kaji. Bimbing. dan Konseling dalam Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2024, doi: 10.22460/quanta.v8i1.4342.[28] R. M. Adnan and M. E. E. M. Matore, “Development of Adversity Quotient (AQ) index of pre-service teachers in Institute of Teacher Education (IPG),” Front. Public Heal., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 01–017, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.940323.[29] C. Payao, M. Balijon, and I. Ancho, “Filipino Students’ Adversity Quotient and School Connectedness,” Int. J. Public Heal. Res., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1832–1845, 2024.[30] P. G. Handayani, B. B. Wiyono, Muslihati, and I. Hambali, “A Synthesis of Adversity Quotient in Student Victims of Bullying,” Pegem J. Educ. Instr., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 168–175, 2023, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.13.03.18.[31] J. Lee, C. Joswick, and K. Pole, “Classroom Play and Activities to Support Computational Thinking Development in Early Childhood,” Early Child. Educ. J., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 457–468, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10643-022-01319-0.[32] A. O. Viyani, R. E. Utami, and A. S. Pramasdyahsari, “The Profile of Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability on Statistics Based on Adversity Quotient,” Int. J. Res. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–59, 2022, doi: 10.26877/ijre.v2i1.10819.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v14i1.103312

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.