TINJAUAN PERJANJIAN BAKU PADA KONTRAK BERLANGGANAN INDIHOME PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA TBK

Nanda Khairunnisa, Ambar Budhisulistyawati

Abstract

 PT Telkom’s Indihome subscription contract is a standard form contract made by one of the leading parties where the other parties by no means have to follow the contract without having any chance to alter the provision under the proposed agreement by both parties. The purpose of this article is to understand the practice of subscription contract by Indihome, whether it is already conducted in accordance to the fundamental of legal agreement or not. This article is done by normative law approach which is prescriptive. Types of data being used in this article are primary, secondary, and tertiary data gathered through document and library study by Cyber Media. Deductive method was used to analyse the case. The result shows that Indihome’s subscription contract did not meet the valid terms of agreement, which is statedt fee in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Indihome’s contract contains an exoneration clause that contradicts Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Act.  

Keywords

Indihome; Standardized Contract; Validity.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku

Bernadette M. Waluyo dan Johannes Gunawan. 2021. Perjanjian Baku Masalah dan Solusi. Jakarta: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Gmbh

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2008. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Cet 2. Kencana. Subekti. 2002. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.


Jurnal

Dhira Utara Umar. 2020. ‘Penerapan Asas Konsensualisme Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Menurut Perspektif Hukum Perdata’. Lex Privatum. Vol 8 No 1. Manado: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sam Ratulang.

Elis Herlina dan Sri Santi. 2016. ‘Model Perjanjian Baku Pada Kontrak Berlangganan Sambungan Telekomunikasi Telepon Selular Pasca Bayar’. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol 23 No 3. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.

M. Muhtarom. 2014. ‘Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian: Suatu Landasan Dalam Pembuatan Kontrak’. Jurnal Suhuf. Vol 26 No 1. Surakarta: Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Sairam Bath, 2009 ‘Law of Business Contracts in India’. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. Vol 20 No 2. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Tri Wahyu Surya Lestari dan Lukman Santoso. 2018. ‘Komparasi Syarat Keabsahan “Sebab Yang Halal” Dalam Perjanjian Konvensional Dan Perjanjian Syariah’. YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam’. Vol 8 No 2. Kudus: Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri.

Zakiyah. 2017. ‘Klausula Eksonerasi Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen’. Jurnal Al’Ad. Vol IX No 3. Banjarmasin: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad albanjari.

Skripsi

Ganis Noer Fadha Kusumandari. 2018. ‘Keabsahan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Antara Pembeli Satuan Ruko Dengan PT. Shapir Yogya Super Mall’. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Wella Dany Permata. 2020. ‘Kajian Kritis Terhadap Pencantuman Klausula Eksonerasi dalam Perjanjian Parkir (Studi Putusan MA Nomor 2078k/pdt/2009 antara PT Securindo Packatama Indonesia Melawan Sumito Y. Viansyah)’. Skripsi. Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen

Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 1999 tentang Telekomunikasi

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v14i1.59252

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.