ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYALAHGUNAAN KEADAAN (MISBRUIK VAN OMSANDIGHEDEN) SEBAGAI ALASAN PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI (STUDI KASUS DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SUKOHARJO NOMOR 19/Pdt.G/2015/PN Skh)

Umarsyah Umarsyah, Pujiyono Pujiyono

Abstract

This article describes and examines the problems, first, what are the indicators of abuse of circumstances in a sale and purchase agreement. Second, how is the judge's consideration in deciding the sale and purchase agreement which contains elements of acts of abuse of circumstances in the Sukoharjo District Court Decision Number 19/Pdt.G/2015/PN Skh. This article is a normative legal research. The nature of this article is prescriptive using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This article uses literature study by collecting primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of data collection were then analyzed using the deductive syllogism method. The results show that the indicators of abuse of circumstances in the sale and purchase agreement are divided into 3 (three) aspects, namely the first in terms of the position of the parties in the contractual phase, the second in terms of the formulation of the agreement, and the third in the aspect of morality. Misuse of conditions in the sale and purchase agreement as a new will has not been clearly regulated in the Civil Code. However, in practice the teaching of abuse of circumstances (misbruik van omstandigheden) contained in the Supreme Court Decision Number 2356 K/Pdt/2008 can be used by judges in the Sukoharjo District Court Decision Number 19/Pdt.G/2015/PN Skh as a reason for canceling the agreement. other than the defects of will that have been regulated in the Indonesian Civil Code, namely coercion (dwang), oversight (dwaling), and fraud (bedrog).

Keywords

Defect of Will; Misbruik Van Omstandigheden; Sale and Purchase Agreement.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku

Ridwan Khairandy. 2013. Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan (Bagian Pertama). Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Dunne, J.M. van. 1993. Verbintenissenrecht, Deell 1, Contractenreccht, le gedeelte, Totstandkoing van Overenkomsten, Inhoud Contractsvoorwarden Gebreken. Deventer: Kluwer.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. 2014. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Muhammad Syarifuddin, 2012. Hukum Kontrak: Memahami Kontrak dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik Hukum (Seri Pengayaan Hukum Perikatan). Bandung : Mandar Maju.

Henry P. Pangabean. 2010. Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden). Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Agus Yudha, Hernoko. 2008. Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Edisi 1. Yoygyakarta : Laksbang Mediatama bekerja sama dengan Kantor Advocat “Hufron dan Hans Simalea”.

Jurnal

Charles E. Clark. 1916. “Confidential Relations and Burden of Proof of Undue Influence in Will Cases”. Yale Law Journal. Volume 1 Nomor 1. Wall Street New Haven : The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.

Daniel A. Plotkin. 2016. “Asseing Undue Influence”. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Volume 44 Nomor 3. Beverly Hills : American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online.

Latifa Mustafida. 2017. “Penerapan Doktrin Misbruik Van Omstandigheiden terhadap Pembatalan Akta Notaris Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan”. Lex Renaissance. Volume 2 Nomor 1. Yogyakarta: FH UII.

Fani Martiawan. 2015. “Paksaan Ekonomi Dan Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Sebagai Bentuk Cacat Kehendak Dalam Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak”. Yuridika. Volume 30 Nomor 2. Surabaya: FH Unair.

Ronald J. Scalise JR. 2008. “Undue Influence And The Law Of Wills: A Comparative Analysis”. Duke Journal Of Comparative & International Law. Volume 19 Nomor 41. Durham, North Carolina : Duke Law.

Tami Rusli. 2015. “Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Sebagai Dasar Perkembangan Perjanjian di Indonesia”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum PRANATA HUKUM. Volume 10 Nomor 1. Bandar Lampung : FH UBL.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) Indonesia / Burgerlijk Wetboek Nederland Burgerlijk Wetboek (NBW)


Putusan

Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 3641 K/Pdt/2001

Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 2356 K/Pdt/2008

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo Nomor 19/Pdt.G/2015/PN Skh

Putusan Hoge Raad (Mahkamah Agung Belanda) 9 Februari 1923, NJ 1923, 676, dalam perkara Hengsten Verening v. Onderlinge Paarden en Vee Assurantie

Internet

https://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id/, diakses pada tanggal 20 Januari 2020 pukul 13.30 WIB.

Kamus

Fockema Andreae. Kamus Istilah Hukum. 1983. Jakarta : Binacipta.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.