KAJIAN YURIDIS PRAKTIK PERSEKONGKOLAN DALAM TENDER (Studi Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2016)

Intania Az Zarah

Abstract

This research aims to determine the consideration of a conspiracy in the Commission decision on Case No. 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 and implementation of legal justice in the Commission’s Decision Case No. 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 in terms of economic and fairness aspects. This research is a normative law research which are prescriptive and applied. The approach used are the statute approach and the case approach. The sources of legal materials consist of primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials with literature study. This research used deductive analysis technique. Commission’s in Decision Number 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 has considered on the case in accordance with Law No. 5 of 1999, however its considerations do not consider whether the consequences of the conspiracy are hindering business competition or not. The commission in deciding the Commission Case Number 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 tended to only pay attention to the justice aspect  while the economic aspect seemed a little neglected, so that the KPPU Decision Number 24 / KPPU-I / 2016 did not fully fulfill legal justice.

Keywords: Tender Conspiracy; Business Competition; Fairness

Keywords

Tender Conspiracy; Business Competition; Fairness

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku:
John Rawls. 1973. A Theory of Justice. London. Oxford University Press.Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia oleh Uzair Fauzan, Heru Prasetyo. 2006.Teori Keadilan, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2014. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada

Media Group.

Rachmadi Usman. 2013. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Richard Posner. 1994. Economic Analysis Law, Ed. 4, USA: Harvard University Press.

Jurnal:
Andryan Dwi Prabawa dan Hernawan Hadi. 2018. “Analisis Kedudukan Hukum Panitia Tender Dalam Kasus Persekongkolan Tender di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat”. Privat Law. Volume 6 Nomor 2. Juli-Desember 2018. Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Anna Maria Tri Anggraini. 2013. “Sinergi BUMN Dalam Pengadaan Barang Dan/Atau Jasa Dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha”. Mimbar Hukum Volume 25 Nomor 3. Oktober 2013. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universita Gadjah Mada.

Enrico Billy Keintjem. 2016. “Tinjauan Yuridis Praktek Persekongkolan Tender Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999”. Lex Administratum Volume 4 Nomor 4. April 2016. Manado: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sam Ratulangi.

Ferry Irawan Febriansyah. 2017. “Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Filosofis Dan Ideologis Bangsa”. DiH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 13 Nomor 25. Februari 2017. Surabaya: Fakulas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya.

George M. Cohen. 1985. “Posnerian Jurisprudence and Economic Analysis Law: The View From The Bench”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Volume 133 Nomor 1117. Juni 1985. Pennsylvania: The University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School.

Muhammad Rustamaji. 2013. “Menakar Pengawasan Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Dalam Pandangan Richard A Posner”. Jurnal Rechtsvinding Volume 2 Nomor 1. April 2013. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Murni. 2012. “Analisa Ekonomi Terhadap Pasal-Pasal Hukum Persaingan Usaha Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999”. Jurnal Arena Hukum Volume 5 Nomor 1. 2012. Malang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.47468

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.